Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Ohio Court Admits Lie Detector Tests As Evidence

Posted by CowboyNeal on from the good-enough-for-maury dept.

An anonymous reader writes "Last month, an Ohio court set a new precedent by allowing polygraph test results to be entered as evidence in a criminal trial. Do lie detectors really belong in the court room? AntiPolygraph.org critiques the polygraph evidence from the this precedential case (Ohio v. Sharma)."

1 of 198 comments (clear)

  1. Precedential case? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1, Troll

    Well, if our Precedent can beat a lie detector, then I don't think they should be allowed in courts...

    --
    This guy's the limit!