Slashdot Mirror


No More TV Listings For MythTV Users

Ryan Brown writes "As of September 1, the free XML TV guide service at zap2it labs has shut its doors due to misuse issues, as well as internal business issues. Now that Linux users, and most PVR users for that matter, are nearing the end of their last fetched TV guide, what free alternatives exist that can replace this much-needed service?"

7 of 346 comments (clear)

  1. Why free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's wrong with paying a couple bucks to get the listing data? Someone somewhere had to pay to provide the service. I don't see why everything, everywhere has to be free, free, free.

    Oh damnit - I forgot. This is slashdot. Paying for stuff = bad.

    1. Re:Why free? by timmarhy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I pay for it already when i'm forced to watch crumby ads for panty liners and erection problems.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    2. Re:Why free? by schon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's wrong with paying a couple bucks to get the listing data? Nothing. However the problem I have with SD is their "Agreement" - in order to get the listings, you have to agree to some pretty damn onerous things, including "not doing anything to piss off anyone at Tribune Media Services, even if you didn't know it would."

      This is a completely untenable clause, because they don't tell you what things might piss them off, nor do they explain their relationship

      For example, complaining on /. (or any other forum) could theoretically make TMS unhappy, which would cause you to be in violation of the "agreement" - and yet you wouldn't know it until after you get your account terminated (or worse, dragged into court.)

      I have no problem paying for it (in fact, I had my credit card out to sign up), but it's some seriously fscked-up shit - too much for me.
  2. Re:That's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So you're saying Zap2It stopped offering their free service because not enough people were using it?

  3. Re:Wow, good going Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here goes some karma...
    No, but it is nice that you've fished for "insightful" mods by prefacing your statement with this.

    Why is it an utter crime to want to get free tv listings?
    It isn't a crime. Nobody said it was. They just said that payment for a service provided by F/OSS devs is reasonable.

    Seriously, tell me. I can download Linux for free, but I guess that's bad? I can read Slashdot for free, but I guess that's bad?
    Nice strawman. You can also read tv schedules online for free too (or at least in the same fake "ad supported" free that you read Slashdot).

    I have a little nagging doubt in my head that they will degrade other methods of program acquisition (EIT, direct inserts into the database from a scraper, etc), to "facilitate" SD (otherwise known as rope people into using their paid-for service, and nothing else). Those fears may or may not be unfounded, but why shouldn't I be worried and looking for alternatives?
    Given the reputations of those involved with SD, this is somewhat insulting. That being said, the reason you have nothing to fear is that the code to process XMLTV listings already exists & is open source.

    There are more pragmatic reasons too--multiple F/OSS projects are collaborating on providing SD & even more will be encouraging their users to get their listings from SD.

    Why shouldn't people want to find out about any free listings that are out there, just like has been offered for years from the Zap2It people?
    They can want whatever they wish! But they aren't going to get it soon. Only two companies compile guide data & they sell it to other businesses. Some of these businesses (like SD) charge at least enough to pay for what it costs them to provide the listings. Others put it on the web & use ads to pay for it. Payment must come from somewhere. Z2It was free because they were a subsidary of Tribune.

    If the data comes from one of the two "mother" listings, it will cost money. Period. No one will give you a free lunch. (Or you can violate TOS by scraping it.)

    If it doesn't come from these "mother" sources, someone would have to form a third listing generation service (but this would cost significant setup & operating $$$ that they'd want to pass on).
  4. Re:www.schedulesdirect.org by swillden · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Right now it's $15 for 3mos, but they are hoping to change that to $20/yr if they get enough sign-ups.

    Wow, they're not exactly marketing geniuses are they? Announce plans to make a very large discount on you service as soon as enough people sign up at the original inflated price? Yeah, that'll pull a huge number of customers in at your launch.

    That's because they're not trying to make a profit, and they're just passing on the reality that they'll have to have a sizable subscriber base in order to defray their fixed costs enough to reduce the fee. They expect that their target audience will understand these issues. Not only that, but both prices are low enough that the costs aren't going to be an issue for their target market.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  5. Re:Wow, good going Slashdot by evilviper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is it an utter crime to want to get free tv listings?

    Because it costs money to get them, assemble them, and distribute them.

    Linux is free because a bunch of volunteers put it together for free. So why aren't you volunteering to call up numerous TV networks, every few days, to get a list of their schedule, and input that into a public database for others to use, for free?

    How about calling up every cable network in the country every month, to see if they've made any changes to their channel line-ups? And checking on every FCC action to see if broadcast TV channels have made any changes.

    Somebody needs to do it. In absence of a huge and sustained mass of unimaginably dedicated volunteers, somebody needs to get paid for doing the hard and thankless work. Otherwise, you're just being a leech.

    Why is it considered mandated that you must pay money to get them, where before they were free?

    Zap2It was being charitable, nothing more. It was costing them money, but they put up with it for quite a while anyhow. No one else has, nor will do so again. There's just no profit in it, and it's not sustainable.

    I'm sure you can think of many other examples of some software or service that started out free, but was merely a loss-leader or other marketing ploy, before it went commercial.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant