Slashdot Mirror


Canadian Bureaucrats Don't "Think Different"

owlgorithm writes "Apple's new store in Montreal has three parking meters on the street in front of it. The city is in the middle of a campaign to reduce downtown parking. In Apple's ever-conscientious attempt to improve design, they offered to reimburse the city for the parking meters and their revenue if the city would remove them. Answer: Non — because 'We've never done it before, so we can't.'"

12 of 427 comments (clear)

  1. You know it's a Slow newsday when ... by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    SlAshDot Guffaw Dept.

    You know it's a Slow newsday when "We've never done it before, so we can't." by Montreal burros constitutes news because it includes Apple.

    Certainly they can't be ... nooooo ... can't be ... they're suggesting they've never accepted money to change the way something is done or not done? What next, Gérald Tremblay caught on camera stating he's giving up his Treo?

    Next up: Microsoft's Power bill - 10,000 PC's running at the same time, is Redmond driving global warming?

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  2. I don't quite get it.. by QMalcolm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The meters are there to reduce the number of parked cars, not for revenue. Apple is offering money, not a solution to overcrowded streets.

    1. Re:I don't quite get it.. by boobavon · · Score: 5, Informative

      TFA says turn 3 meter spots into no parking zone.

    2. Re:I don't quite get it.. by Phisbut · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It seems someone at the city has missed a way to make a buck, and fix their traffic problem.

      The city didn't miss an opportunity to make money. Apple wanted to pay the equivalent of the parking fares for the next 5 years. However, the city makes way more money from parking tickets than from parking meters.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    3. Re:I don't quite get it.. by Decado · · Score: 5, Funny

      Would have been much funnier if the city had agreed to remove the parking meters, taken the 35k and put 3 much larger and more obtrusive No Parking signs there instead.

      --

      Slashdot: Proof that a million monkeys at a million typewriters can create a masterpiece

    4. Re:I don't quite get it.. by NoStrings · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wouldn't that make it a buy-law?

  3. kdawson spam by Traxxas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And this is a story how? Why should a city remove meters because the business is Apple. If Apple doesn't want to deal with the meters they shouldn't have put the store there.

  4. they should hire a "genius" to feed the meters by netsavior · · Score: 5, Funny

    he could also stand there looking all sullen and geek chic.

  5. Retarded Story by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That "news" story isn't quoting Montreal bureaucrats. It's putting words in their mouths to make a (stupid) point. All the writer knows is that the city refused - they don't actually know why, and there's no sign they actually asked anyone.

    Parking meters, as the writer did note, are designed not to collect a little revenue, but to keep parking turning over quickly so more people can share fewer parking spots. "No Parking" signs don't replace them where they're needed (like in front of stores like Apple's) because parking is appropriate there, just not unlimited.

    This is a stupid story by a stupid writer. Published by a stupid Slashdot editor.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  6. Hrm... by JacobO · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm not sure you should judge Canadians by the actions of the Québécois. They are distinct, after all, and should be laughed at as a separate group.

  7. Not really a quote by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 5, Informative

    TFA is an editorial, not an article. It is the opinion of the Montreal Gazette. No bureaucrat ever said "We've never done if before, so we can't." The quote was made up to make a point in the editorial. It's not real.

    If you want to read the real article, go to the source (sorry, it is en francais. Run it through the Babelfish if you are desperate.)

    I don't disagree that the city is being a bit obstinate, but I can see why they wouldn't want to change streetfronts on Apple's request. If they do it for them, they'll have to do it for every other downtown storefront. Besides, and I am not exaggerating, the $35,000 Apple is promising probably wouldn't even cover the cost of tasking a union city crew to remove the meters, rebuild the sidewalk and put the meters someplace else.

    1. Re:Not really a quote by macshit · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People need to park in order to buy.

      No they don't. In real cities, people don't need cars at all (I don't know for sure whether Montreal is a real city, but from what I hear, it's not too bad).

      Apple is clearly a bit confused by this concept (being headquartered in Cupertino, I suppose it's understandable).

      Sorry folks but the answer is building green cars not in banning parking spaces.

      No. The fundamental problem with cars is that they suck up space, and "green cars" do absolutely nothing to address that.

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....