Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Sued by a Beijing Student Over 'Privacy Violation'

freakxx writes "Xinhua report that a Beijing University student has sued Microsoft for allegedly gathering personal information via Windows Genuine Advantage. He has demanded a compensation of 1,350 RMB (around US$ 180) and an open apology printed in a national newspaper. The student has accused Microsoft of using WGA to gather information about his computer and himself, rather than solely checking whether or not the installed Windows XP system was genuine. A Microsoft spokesman has declined to speak on this issue and said that the matter is under investigation."

7 of 157 comments (clear)

  1. Customers. by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Insightful
    > "What we can say is that Microsoft is fully committed to letting customers control their personal information."

    "Customers." They keep using that word. I do not think that word means what most of us think it means.

    OEMs are the customer. The end user who purchases a PC from an OEM and finds himself dependent on Microsoft is not the customer, he is the product.

    1. Re:Customers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
      > How about a more realistic look: OEMs are the customer who buys the Windows licenses. And end-users are the customers of the hardware vendors who preinstall Windows on their machines to make them usable for the masses.

      The problem with Microsoft is they're no longer working this way. Their business model is much more like that of RIAA/MPAA.

      The guy watching Battlestar Galactica isn't the customer of the Sci-Fi Channel. He's the product. Sci-Fi's customer is the advertiser, who purchases the product (us). BSG is merely the means by which Sci-Fi delivers the product (us) to the customer (advertiser).

      Similarly, Microsoft's installed base is the product. OEMs are the customer, users are the product, and the operating system is the means by which Dell gets to monetize its investment in Microsoft OEM licenses.

  2. solidarity begins at home. by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    to those living in United States. before you start making fun of China, think of the situation with privacy in your homeland. Love, PPJ.

  3. Re:I'd rather Microsoft have my info by vux984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd rather Microsoft have my personal info than the government. Any government.

    If Microsoft had it they'd just sell it to the governent. Any government.

  4. Why Doesn't Someone Do It In the U.S.? by asphaltjesus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    WGA works the same here as it does in China. The notion that they collect "no personal information" is very clever, but untrue.

    Microsoft can easily associate your pc with a record in their backend because each pc generates a unique signature. They don't have your name at the moment, but that doesn't mean they don't know who's using their OS when and where. Given the number of times a windows box phones home when it goes online, I'd say there's plenty they know about you.

    This is exactly like the story some months ago where AOL gave out search data that was supposedly private. Same situation, bigger fish.

    BTW, if you are still married to a microsoft OS, your software firewall should be good enough to alert you when it attempts these connections. My Kerio firewall at work does it. And marriage is the right word for it because sometimes you wonder what the hell you got yourself into.

    --
    Got Trader Joe's? friendwich.com RSS feeds work now!
  5. Probably the most important lawsuit this year by SpeedDevil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I truly hope he wins. And I am glad that he is not asking for much. I'm pretty sure Microsoft will try to settle out of court but I am also pretty sure this guy is not really doing this for the money. The Chinese government has been trying to reinforce the people's trust in their legal system so I don't think they will just push the case aside, especially after it being covered on Slashdot. I really hope this case gets the attention it needs because this case could be the answer to protecting the privacy of all of us. Setting the precedent in China will make way for more precedents elsewhere. Lu Feng ... we are with you!!! K PS: I'm pretty sure somebody in Microsoft is going nuts right now ... hehe

    --
    "The User is a dangerous animal so handle it with extreme caution." Krassi (me)
  6. Re:He's Chinese He Has No Rights! by Petrushka · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And, er, which country would you suggest he move to? Are you under the impression that there are any countries that don't collect personal data on their inhabitants and conduct surveillance on them? (I omit wiretaps, of course, as there are lots of countries that don't do that.)