Legal Summits to Tackle Linux
An anonymous reader writes "BuilderAU has the story that the Linux Foundation, custodians of the Linux trademark, have announced that they will host two summits to deal with legal issues surrounding Linux and open-source software. Attendance at the first summit will be restricted to members of the Linux Foundation and their legal counsel. The second summit — an open meeting — will be held in Autumn 2008 where legal experts from any background will be able to attend."
Linus made Linux in the first place. It's his baby. He should be able to take it wherever he wants, whether you or I like it.
And RMS and the FSF made the GPL in the first place, and also wrote lots of code under that license and made it popular. It's their baby, and the FSF have stated their goals and aims very clearly in the text of the GPL, which even a baby can understand. The cry-baby corporate goons who are trying to steal the thunder of the GPL have been checkmated by the FSF which has upgraded the license. Linus' reluctance to adopt the GPL3 shows him as a true hypocrite, enemy of freedom, enemy of the GPL, and accomplice of the corporate interests in the Linux Foundation.
If not the GPL3, Linus should re-release the kernel in BSD then, if he hates what the GPL stands for.
If you want an OS that fits your ideology, find like-minded people and build one.
So, if you don't like the laws of your home country will you flee or build one? What planet are you on? Linux is licensed under the GPL and violations of the spirit of the GPL are more harmful to it's continued growth than trademark violations which this Foundation governs.
If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....