Ameritrade Security Audit Finds Privacy-Busting Back Door
RalphTheWonderLlama writes "In recent months, online stock brokers have apparently been upset by the sale of their email addresses to spammers. Today TD Ameritrade released details of their investigation into the matter (along with a video message from the CEO and special FAQ). It seems some 'unauthorized code' had exposed client email addresses and possibly other sensitive information from an internal database. 'TD Ameritrade tracked down the break-in while doing an internal investigation into stock-related spam. The company called in forensic investigators and they discovered "unauthorized code" in their system that provided access for the hacker or hackers. According to the advisory, the code has been eliminated from the system. Moglia, speaking in an online video-taped message to customers, said he is "confident" that they have figured out how the information was taken.'"
Great. How did that "bad code" get there? Did they close THAT loophole? Because if not, it's just a matter of time.
My blog. Good stuff (when I remember to update it). Read it.
As a TD Ameritrade account holder I find this unacceptable. Not only do they have unauthorized code running on their local systems with access to customers social security numbers and the like, but they don't even tell their customers when this happens other than issuing a generic press release in which they say they think the hackers only got email addresses despite the fact that the data base the hackers had access to also had birth dates, social security numbers and everything else necessary to steal account holders' identities.
How does unauthorized code even get into a financial institutions systems? The banking systems should never be accessible via public networks, only private ones, so this should never have happened.
What exactly is TD Ameritrade doing about this? TD Ameritrade should at least give it's customers free credit monitoring.
You don't have to look far - this one is particularly damning, and I've seen evidence elsewhere that people set up an email address ONLY for Ameritrade and they've watched the spam come in.
Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
Quotes, and translation:
The company called in forensic investigators and they discovered "unauthorized code" in their system that provided access for the hacker or hackers.
Moglia, speaking in an online video-taped message to customers, said he is "confidant" that they have figured out how the information was taken.
It's necessary to know how to translate those statements. It looks like plain English, but it isn't. It's Exec-lish, and must be translated.
Exec-lish to English translation: "We don't actually have anyone our company that understands technical computer issues. The software was written by a low bidder to whom we awarded a contract. Since we don't have any technically knowledgeable people on staff, we had no way to understand if we should have confidence in the bidder or not."
"We don't know how many people accessed our system through the back door, or how many times, or for how long. (Actually I had never heard the term 'back door' until yesterday.) Since we don't have any technical knowledge, we can't assess whether there are other back doors. Possibly even the forensic investigators have left their own back doors."
Exec-lish is a weird language that doesn't allow the expression of negative facts. So, it is possible that, if the executive wanted to be truthful, he or she would say, "I'm not qualified to be in this job, since I don't know enough to understand the company's operations thoroughly."
I'm just guessing about that translation, but gathering from what I've seen at other companies, it is not far off.
Despite the whitewashing that's going on, AMTD is going to take a BIG hit. These issues are not to be taken lightly.
From the FAQ:
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
tidokoro
what turns a man's karma neutral? lust for gold? power? or just a heart born full of neutrality?