DOJ To Open Price-Fixing Query Into NAND Memory Market
Ep0xi writes "Following on previous investigations into price fixing in the SRAM and DRAM memory market, the US Department of Justice has begun an antitrust investigation of the NAND flash-memory industry.' Edwin Mok, a financial analyst at Needham, added that the NAND market was competitive. Mok, who covers SanDisk, said he would be surprised if the company did anything wrong. 'I don't see a huge impact on the company or the stock,' he said. SanDisk shares were up $1.30, or 2.6 percent, to $51.29 on Friday. But [another industry analyst] said NAND prices showed an unusual 5 percent increase in the second quarter and are expected to climb an additional 8 percent in the third quarter, before declining again in the fourth quarter. Demand remains strong.'"
So what should flash memory be costing these days anyway, for the end user? I've been going by the rule $10 a gigabyte. If they're price fixing to avoid passing on savings to customers, about how much of a difference would that be?
Evidently, the key to understanding recursion is to begin by understanding recursion. The rest is easy.
I'll preface this by saying that I own stock in Sandisk (SNDK).
I am not selling SNDK at this point, because I find any insinuation that they are involved in price fixing questionable. The price per gigabyte for flash memory has been dropping significantly quarter after quarter, though they do note that prices have increased slightly the last two quarters. While I'm not an analyst by any means, I don't see this as a significant or indicative trend and unless they have incriminating emails passing around between CEOs, I'm sure these increases could be attributed to a number of things such as the school year and Christmas coming up (which increases demand) and the recent manufacturing shutdown at a major Samsung plant (which reduced production).
You also have Apple talking about new laptops down the pipeline that will potentially use a lot of flash and a flood of new hardware such as the new fat-wide ipod and the iphone which increase need for flash storage. So you have vastly increasing demand for the product with an industry that is still trying to ramp up production to keep up. I don't see how a slight price increase over two quarters would be a surprise?
Is it just my impression, or has USB memory sticks been cheap as chips recently? There are 2GB sticks going for £8 on eBay at the moment.
The question that shold be asked is, if prices were supposed to continue to fall, how cheap would it eventually become?
This seems really odd to me, as the article doesn't mention any actionable reason, only that prices have gone up here and there. They're going to need documents, emails, whistle-blowers, recorded conversations, or something tangible in order to prove there's an active colusion going on.
I'm confused, I thought price fixing was the FTC's domain.
Part of the hardcore faithful who believed in Apple long before it was cool again to do so
...this is a cut-throat market. Even if price fixing were occurring, they would be making very little profit (relatively).
"You, the geniuses who invent and improve the RAM capacities, shall sell them only in a manner we, the angry, scientifically illiterate, power hungry, charismatic savages in government, with armed thugs under our thrall, permit you to."
We now return you to your regularly scheduled world of curtains with pretty pictures projected on them.
(-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
Its almost a brand new industry (though with a lot of old players), and the price has dropped like a rock in the last 10 years. Its almost becoming a commodity now!
Let's sue the cut-throat competitive hardware companies that reduce prices almost constantly, and turn a blind eye to our cell phone carriers, our broadband providers, the oil companies, our software giants, and the media that continue to turn record profits while prices climb higher and higher...
Does anyone else feel like something's not right here?