A Gut Check On Gutsy Gibbon
jammag writes "Linux pundit Bruce Byfield looked inside the pre-release of Gutsy Gibbon and found what he calls 'Windows thinking.' His article, Divining from the Entrails of Ubuntu's Gutsy Gibbon, notes that Ubuntu is the dominant distro, having achieved a level of success that might be leading to complacency. He opines: 'Only once or twice did I find a balance between accessibility to newcomers and a feature set for advanced users. At times, I wondered whether the popularity might be preventing Ubuntu from finishing some rough edges.'"
Word soon got round on the grapevine that there was a minitel whore out there who was being tortured and abused in her sleep by her man and that I would do to her anything I was asked. I couldn't log into a chat room now without fighting my way out of a heap of messages within a couple of minutes, except by using a different name. But I did get some great requests. One character wanted me to smoke a cigarette, holding the tip close to her lovely nipples between drags, and then to put it out in her cunthole. Well, I hadn't declined a request yet and wasn't about to start now. I did it and got so excited that I had to shoot my spunk on her face with the cigarette butt still poking out of those lovely wet cunny lips. Then, on that same night, another miniteliste asked for the blade of a big kitchen knife to be pushed up my lovely Ginny's vagina. I had previously chickened out from doing this but, nevertheless, was delirious at the prospect of knifing my own girlfriend in her cunt at the request of another man. I was very close to making it my first refusal but he offered to send me some of his collection of child torture pics as payment for knifing Ginny, and what he sent was so sexy and vile that I decided to stab her up the cunthole immediately. After receiving by fax forty assorted photos and drawings of little boys and girls, some as young as two or three, being gang raped, whipped, hand fucked with monster dildos, spunked on, pissed on, shit on, bound with barbed wire, electrocuted on their baby genitals, impaled, cut open with knives (one drawing showed a toddler eating his own penis), bottled up their vaginas and bottoms, burned with cigarette lighters and forced to sit in bowls of boiling water, I could hardly refuse him the simple pleasure of seeing some photos of a twelve inch sabatier knife inserted blade first into my Ginny's thirty three year old cunt, could I? The whore bled but not as profusely as I'd feared. I was praying I wouldn't cut anything really serious in there but determinedly eased that huge knife into her cunthole until almost the entire blade had disappeared inside Ginny at which moment the pointed tip must surely have touched or even cut into her cervix. In fact I did it four times, taking frequent photographs. First I pushed the blade in vertically with the cutting edge facing upwards, secondly downwards and, on the third and fourth times, the blade was positioned horizontally, first to the left then the right. The final photo showed the knife, smeared with her blood, held over Ginny's beautiful face. Christ, what I wouldn't have given for the chance of getting away with just shoving that knife into her cunt really hard and stabbing it in and out, fucking her with it, and cutting her vagina and womb to shreds. For a few moments, I wanted to murder Ginny Harris with that knife. The bitch complained of being sore the next day and having spots of blood in her little panties and I really thought I'd gone too far this time. She put it down to too much fucking (she hadn't a clue how much fucking she was getting!) and her period, due any day. I don't believe in god but thanked it anyway, just to cover the possibility. That was the last time I knifed Ginny up her cunt or anywhere else for that matter. After that incident, during which I frightened myself with the ease with which I could have murdered her. Not killed by accident. I actually wanted to knife her to death, to kill her up her cunt. I took a break from the minitel. It was doing my head in.
I'm just curious. I see this phenomenon where folks reply to an unrelated first post... this usually happens when there are already several replies to the article itself. Why does this occur?
See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
Bruce Byfield has a face that only a mother could love...
Am I the only one who blocks photos of geeky journalists?