Daniel Lyons of Forbes Admits Being Snowed by SCO
certain death writes "Daniel Lyons of Forbes Magazine has admitted to being snowed by SCO, regarding their lawsuit over Linux and SCO code. He specifically mentions Groklaw's role in the case, and regrets his early articles giving the company the benefit of the doubt. 'I still thought it would be foolish to predict how this lawsuit (or any lawsuit) would play out. I even wrote an article called "Revenge of the Nerds," which poked fun at the pack of amateur sleuths who were following the case on a Web site called Groklaw and who claimed to know for sure that SCO was going to lose. Turns out those amateur sleuths were right. Now some of them are writing to me asking how I'd like my crow cooked, and where I'd like it delivered. Others in that highly partisan crowd have suggested that I wanted SCO to win, and even that I was paid off by SCO or Microsoft. Of course that's not true. I've told these folks it's not true. Hasn't stopped them. The truth, as is often the case, is far less exciting than the conspiracy theorists would like to believe. It is simply this: I got it wrong. The nerds got it right.'"
...welcome our new amateur sleuth overlords!
Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
looks like your 5 digit UID says you do :-)
As I said in another post, reporters don't have to be maritime engineers to report on ships sinking. This reporter works for Forbes, so I wouldn't expect him to know anything about the history of Unix. However, when the note crosses his desk talking about SCOX suing IBM over allegations that SCO's copyrighted Unix code leaking into Linux via AIX, he should do his utmost to learn about these things called Unix, Linux and AIX. That's his job. The fact was that he, like a lot of the Wall Street crowd, don't like open source, and so, rather than being a reporter, he became nothing more than a shill. If he was too stupid to even bother getting paid by SCO, then I'd say that's even more points against him, because if you're going to be a biased prick, then at least be a corrupt biased prick.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
...I thought this turkey could fly.
If I've learned anything from recent Presidential elections, changing your opinions due to new information is a sign of weakness. One must make a choice and ride it all the way down.
Blar.
What record straight? He maligned open source, basically called the developers of the Linux kernel a pack of thieves, mocked (and is still mocking) the people who did his job for him and dug up the evidence. I mean, if a fucking paralegal can bloody well go through the archives and come up with some history, then surely a Forbes reporter can do it as well.
Fuck him. He's not a journalist. He's a corporate whore with an anti-open source agenda who only fesses up after SCO is laying in ruins. He can take his apology and shove it up his ass, where, I'm assuming, he's recently removed Daryl McBride's manly member.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
Well my 4 Digit UID says he doesn't.
--= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
Sure you want to get into that battle?
I thought all fruit flies like a banana?
Do you extra-low UID guys have some sort of mailing list that tells you that these threads are happening? It seems like every time one starts, one of you 3-digit people comes in to trump everyone else.
But then again, I could be wrong.
I have seen people using comma or parentheses excessively, including myself, but you beat them all with your generous (and improper) usage of full stop.
Pwnz3d.
Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
you must be new here