Slashdot Mirror


Do You Need a Permit to Land on the Moon?

Billosaur writes "With the recent announcement of Google's X-prize for a successful private landing of a robot on the Moon, someone has asked the Explainer at Slate.com if permission is required to land something on the Moon? Turns out that while there is no authority that regulates landing objects on another world, getting there does require the permission of the national government from where the launch takes place. This is in accordance with the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, signed by 91 nations, which regulates the uses of outer space by the nations of Earth. Specifically, Article VI enjoins: 'The activities of non-governmental entities in outer space, including the Moon and other celestial bodies, shall require authorization and continuing supervision by the appropriate State Party to the Treaty.' Start your paperwork!" J adds: The relevant quote from Destination Moon is "If we ask for permission, they'll find a way to block us. So we go now, as soon as we can!"

3 of 223 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Extradition by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My question is, once you're there, who's going to come up to arrest you?

    Myself and many others will doing everything we can to encourage the government to go and get you. We have to find some way to get NASA properly funded, perhaps the collection of fees and taxes will work.

  2. Re:Space Age Colonialism by arivanov · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And so the seeds of space piracy and "independent traders" are sown...

    Recipe for telling the state go suck bricks through a thin straw sideways:

    1. Buy an old oil platform
    2. Refurbish
    3. Reregister under the flag of a tiny pacific island which is not a signee to the treaty (optional)
    4. Tow outside territorial waters (bonus points for launching from near the equator to save fuel).
    5. Launch... And potentially Profit...

    Example: http://www.boeing.com/special/sea-launch/why_sea_launch.htm. Surprise who are the usual suspects - the darlings of the USA defence industry - Boeing and the darlings of the russian defence industry - Energia. Cousying in the same bed. Nicely and quietly while the USA and Russia politicians rattle the sabres in the name of a new Cold War.

    Alternative recipe

    1. Buy or hire an Il-76, An-124 or Mriya. The last is difficult, for the rest call this chap: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/6991487.stm. He is rumoured to be good. Alternatively, get your hand on a White Swan or a Concorde (that may be quite difficult, but as our Bulgarian friends say "What cannot be bought with money can be bought with a A LOT of money").
    2. Reregister it under a suitable nation in the middle of Africa or Oceania (optional).
    3. Load a launch vehicle on it. Two under development - Shtil-3A and RIF-MA. Both are rumoured to work. To buy - call the same chap. Or build your own.
    4. Fly outside the airspace of all nations signing the treaty (again - bonus points for equatorial launch)
    5. Launch... and potentially Profit...

    Example: http://www.friends-partners.org/partners/mwade/lvs/shtil3a.htm and http://www.friends-partners.org/partners/mwade/lvs/rifma.htm. Actually the last 5 on the right will all do nicely: http://www.friends-partners.org/partners/mwade/graphics/n/newlv640.jpg.

    Alternatively (if you manage to get your hands on a White Swan or manage to get the French to sell you a Concnorde as a launch vehicle): http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/burlak.htm

    --
    Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
    http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  3. Re:Makes sense by polar+red · · Score: 4, Interesting

    what do you want an extra arm and leg for ?

    --
    Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?