Microsoft Prepping Browser-based Word and Excel

JCWDenton writes "In a bid to spin its web-based version of Office into contention with rival internet behemoth Google, Microsoft has said it will begin accepting applications for beta testing its web apps later this year. There is one significant difference, however: unlike Google apps, Microsoft said users of its new service can only create or edit online documents if they have Office software already installed on their machines. Microsoft said features of its Office Live Workspace would include allowing users to upload more than 1,000 documents to free personal websites."

Comments

What's the point?

[k_187]

If you have to have office installed, why bother with the online version? I could see them requiring office to register for an account. But why bother?

Re:What's the point?

[suv4x4]

If you have to have office installed, why bother with the online version? I could see them requiring office to register for an account. But why bother?

There is no point. You need to see Microsoft thinks in multiple steps, and this is just step 1.

Step 1 is about rolling out a beta of this software, and allow the public to test it, give feedback, and their devs to improve on that.

The fact they offer it only to existing customers means there's no chance that this may hurt their Office sales. And it also lets the world know that Microsoft is "aware" of competing web products, such as Google's.

Should things get rough (Step 2), Microsoft already will have a mature web product in their hands, it will have people familiar with working with this product, and have the option of changing how to offer it, including separately for an yearly fee, as Google does.

It's the benefit of having so much money, you can throw them in all directions and use what "sticks".

Re:What's the point?

[ThirdPrize]

Just read the articles and it doesn't bear much similarity to the summary Taco posted. There is a M$ press release that describes a off-site document hosting set up. As long as you have Office installed on a machine you can download/edit/review documents from the server anywhere in the world. Not really comparable to Googles offerings.

Re:What's the point?

[neoform]

Microsoft has been trying to switch to the service model forever. If they had an online version the could charge either a per use fee, or a monthly subscription. Right now they're 'stuck' with their one time sale that doesn't provide MS with the money they feel the deserve.

Re:What's the point?

[Anonymous Coward]

Mod parent's post up. Microsoft is NOT creating a "browser-based" version of MS Office. The press release simply describes a collaboration service that allows you to store and share office documents online. Folks assuming otherwise haven't read the press release (big surprise) and are dolts.

Re:What's the point?

[MightyMartian]

Of course, the nice thing about Google Docs is all I need is a compliant browser on any suitable operating system, so what we're talking about here, once you strip away all the hype, is nothing more than remote storage of your documents. I mean, if you need Office installed, then it only eliminates the step where you copy the file from a remote site to the local machine, then edit and then upload it again.

Not that Google Docs is all that great; it's certainly no Office, and maybe it's simply not possible to build a comprehensive office app in Ajax, which is why Microsoft is going this route.

Re:What's the point?

[Locutus]

my thinking on this went like this, 'how can Microsoft leverage their existing monopolies on the Windows OS and office applications?'. Well, putting this out there for free to existing Microsoft Office users is one way to leverage the MS Office monopoly. After all, once Microsoft built this monopoly, they've been really consistent at making sure only MS Office vX users could exchange with MS Office vX users. If they don't tie this with MS Office 2007, they'll surely do so at a later date.

Step One of the forward looking steps which are ALWAYS part of Microsoft's project design principles is 'How can it be used to protect the monopoly?'.

Microsoft does not need any money from these web apps, just needs to make sure the gravy trains of MS Windows and MS Office continue. Google is looking for revenue and coming up with tools/ideas to attract customers. Microsoft is doing what it's done for close to 20 years, attacking new ideas and protecting what it has. IMO.

LoB

Re:What's the point?

[Corporate Troll]

However, it does seem to make it easier to pirate - instead of installing the whole Office package and somehow cracking the CD-key issue, you could just do a quick copy-over of the applicable registry entries.

And you think that's going to be easy? Fuck, have you seen what Office dumps into your registry. If I didn't knew that it's an Office Suite, I'd think it's a Operating Service pack in the likes of XP SP2....

Re:What's the point?

[ConceptJunkie]

If I didn't knew that it's an Office Suite, I'd think it's a Operating Service pack in the likes of XP SP2...

But it's Office, it's more tightly integrated into the OS than a mere service pack.

Anywhere..

[Travis Mansbridge]

Now you can use our software anywhere. As long as that software is already there.

Why the web?

[Shadow Wrought]

Because math errors on the desktop are so confining.

Already have Office installed

[christurkel]

And will work only Internet Explorer, let me guess. This is will be competition, how?

Re:Already have Office installed

[PlatyPaul]

According to TFA, there will be read-only access for those who don't have Office installed, and (just my guess) that will likely extend to use with non-approved browsers.

Typical Microsoft-think

[BJZQ8]

Microsoft said users of its new service can only create or edit online documents if they have Office software already installed on their machines

So close, yet so far away...

What a great idea!

[HexaByte]

What a great idea! Smash the free competition with your version that requires users to fork out hundreds of dollars to get what they can have from the other guy for nothing.

I'm gonna use this model to build a pay per url web and make billions! I just know everyone will want to use MY web, because by paying for it, they'll know it has real value, unlike that free junk!

Knee Jerk, or Just Jerk

[OneSmartFellow]

Wow, are they getting lazy at M$ or what. I guess somebody got a raise, but I also guess he'll be getting fired in about 6 months when there is no uptake on their generous offer.

Billiam must be wondering how much longer his empire can survive with such stupidity.

Pros and Cons

[thatskinnyguy]

Pros:

• Updated versions constantly
• Access from anywhere the tubes go.
• Ease of sharing documents.

Cons:

• DoS attack at Microsoft could mean loss of revenues for companies using this service
• I never have experienced any "outages" of Office installed on my desktop. Have you?
• Do you really own anything but your user name for this service? How expensive is a user name going to be?

Competition is good

[speaker of the truth]

Yet another fine example of how competition is good. Although personally I've moved away from the buggy implementation of Google Docs (the text editing is fairly clumsy) to OOo. I've lost access to the internet part however I rarely used it (simply stopped me from opening a second program and the load times were seeing this advantage dwindle). I might have been tempted to try out Microsoft's offering, but I'd rather not be tied to Windows right now (might change later next year when I give Office 2007 a whirl).

Why office should be installed in the machine?

[140Mandak262Jamuna]

Are they trying to share DLLs between installed MS-Office software and the Web based spreadsheet and word tools? Given their track record this is typically the kind of thing they will do. They preload MS-Office DLLs during boot to create the impression of instant-on MS-Office compared to OpenOffice. (They don't have try this hard to beat OpenOffice in launch time, but that is a different issue). They might tunnel behind the browser and security and everything so that the web based tool can give you faster response time. They don't have to stream in code to execute in the browser and they don't have to send changes back to the server to rerender the page being edited.

I could easily imagine a development team pitching this idea to the pointy haired bosses. "We have this huge installed base of DLLs and megabytes of code already in the client's machine. We beat them in the download time! We execute complex code in their machine, we beat Google in refresh time! yay!! yay!!!" Of course, such a thing would violate all security protocols, and create thousands of security holes, but they won't care. It would not work in any platform other than Windows and they won't care. It might not work in FireFox and they would go, "yeah! that will kill FF"

Anyway this is all speculation, but I don't see why they would demand pre installed Ms-Office to allow a web based tool to work.

Re:Why office should be installed in the machine?

[suv4x4]

After some research, the Slashdot title and summary are, as usual, completely wrong. The Office Live service will complement Office, and NOT offer online Word and Excel.

It'll offer complementing services, such as email, online synch and storage.

CmdrTaco, how would you feel to get fired from your own blog for incompetence?

Re:Why office should be installed in the machine?

[Angst Badger]

It's much more likely that Office will simply launch as a tab or iframe in IE, with no actual connection to the net besides the ability to store and retrieve documents from one of Microsoft's servers. What's being sold here, ultimately, is an MS-hosted fileserver with provisions for sharing files amongst one's coworkers.

In terms of actual document-editing capabilities, Google's office toys aren't serious competition for anyone. Their strength is in providing collaboration tools for small to medium-sized business. (Forget the enterprise.) OpenOffice actually is competition for MS Office in terms of capabilities, though it still lags way behind in collaboration tools. Until Google -- or someone else -- stops screwing around with second-rate DHTML clones of WordPad, and builds MS Office-equivalent (and interoperable) collaboration tools for OpenOffice, Microsoft has nothing to fear from Google in this area.

In the meantime, Microsoft is just fishing around for new revenue streams. The problem here isn't that Microsoft doesn't get it. They get it just fine. The problem is that neither their customer base nor their competition get it. You and I, dear reader, may be dismayed by their bullshit, but we aren't part of the target market in the first place.

Bill Gates quoted as saying

[Tejin]

"That's the stupidest fucking thing I've heard since I've been at Microsoft!"

Re:come now. tell me that this isnt a me-too -

[xgr3gx]

I agree, me-too's aren't always bad. They foster competition and innovation. But everything shouldn't be a me too. When a new technology shows up and M$ wants in, they quickly buy a startup that has already developed something similar, and rebrands it to M$. That's not even a me-too, that's just laziness. Who did they buyout for this online office thing? And putting Outlook online...that's called webmail. (I'll give them credit though...the calendar reminders look just like the desktop Outlook...that's cool)

Re:Google competes?

[j-pimp]

Google is competing with MS Office? Don't you actually have to have a product on the market to be considered a competitor?

At this point, all the pies Google plans to have their thumbs in are nothing more than vaporware.

There are certain documents that I store in google docs and spreadsheets. I'd hardly call their apps vaporware.

Microsoft has a product. Google's online office tools perform a similar function. Its very possible people can say that Google's suite is "good enough" for some people not to buy Office. On top of that, if someone uses Google's office suite because its free and then decides they need more functionality, they would be more likely to consider Open Office if they already find free office suites as acceptable.

Look at the IE versus Netscape competition of the browser wars. Netscape and Microsoft were both giving away browsers for free. They both wanted their browser to dominate so they could sell their other products, that were delivered to the users through browsers.

I'm looking forward to...

[oahazmatt]

I'm looking forward to Microsoft's next big thing: The Browser-based Browser. "You can now use Internet Explorer through any other browser, just make sure you have Internet Explorer installed!"

PR speak

[cerberusss]

FTFA:

Microsoft business division president Jeff Raikes said: "We are taking a significant step forward by combining our deep client and server software experience with our strong commitment to delivering flexible services offerings for our wide variety of customers and their unique needs."

Such language makes me wonder whether English is these people's first language.

Online word processors are not up to par

[icepick72]

For the most part, the web browser is too generic to allow any product built on it to compete with an existing standalone counterpart (unless it natively make heavy use of the web), just like Google apps vs Microsoft Office standalone. Hell, even Open Office is having a hard time fighting MS with a standalone product of its own. I can imagine Open Office developers would laugh if approached with the great idea of "going online" to continue competing. You'll always have a select few who are happy with the web version but the stats are extremely small.

The only reason for Microsoft to go online is to provide an answer to Google apps and others like it. Sure it's a useless answer but at least it's an answer. MS office needs better web integration regardless.

ActiveX is not "web"

[linebackn]

It seems like they have been trying for something like this for quite a while. Obviously this would be implemented using Win32 ActiveX binaries so it would be IE and Windows only.

Congratulations, Microsoft, you just re-invented client/server architecture, just using web protocols as a transport.

Thin edge of the wedge

[xigxag]

Microsoft is clearly hoping the whole web app idea will fail. To a large extent, Office IS Microsoft. It is their huge cash cow and must be protected at all costs.

But, they don't want to be caught totally unprepared for a paradigm shift, so placing web apps allows them to gauge the market penetration and use of these types of applications, as well as keeping users locked into the MS camp.

But they don't really want to see this succeed, not even a little bit. MS doesn't "get" the web, never has, and if they have to compete on Google's home turf, they will lose.

No outages on the desktop

[symbolset]

I never have experienced any "outages" of Office installed on my desktop...

Then you haven't tried visio.