Slashdot Mirror


'30 Year Laptop Battery' is Unscientific Myth

An anonymous reader wrote to mention the wonderful news: "A research group funded by U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory is developing a battery which can provide continuous power to your laptop for 30 years! Betavoltaic power cells are constructed from semiconductors and use radioisotopes as the energy source..." Except, not so much. ZDNet's Mixed Signals blog with Rupert Goodwins explains why (as always) if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is: "The sort of atomic structures that generate power when bombarded with high energy electrons are the sort that tend to fall apart when bombarded with high energy electrons. While solar cells have the same problem, it's to a much lesser extent. There's a lot of research into making materials that don't suffer so much, but it remains a serious issue ... while it's true that a tritium-powered battery will eventually turn into an inert, safe lump of nothing much, and while it's also true that a modest amount of shielding will keep the radioactivity within the the battery the while, there's the small problem that if you break the battery during its life the nasties come out."

23 of 322 comments (clear)

  1. I think.. by z0idberg · · Score: 4, Funny

    the nastiest came out and broke your grammar checker.

    1. Re:I think.. by z0idberg · · Score: 4, Funny

      and my preview button.

  2. Laptop? by The+Aethereal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, my lap is exactly where I want to put something radioactive.

    1. Re:Laptop? by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Funny
      > "Meh. It's a beta emitter; beta radiation is completely harmless to humans as long as you have a nice layer of skin between you and it.

      However, when it gets into the body it is EXTREMELY harmful, so the worry is that people will break the batteries open and release toxic crap into the environment where it can be inhaled/ingested.

      So if you thought laptop battery fires were dangerous before, these are a terrorist wet dream made to order ...

    2. Re:Laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      On the order of throwing florescent bulbs at someone to try to poison them with Mercury vapor. Sir, your ideas intrigue me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
    3. Re:Laptop? by troc · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's obviously mated to a 1 farad resistor to make a nice bandpass filter :)

      --
      Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
    4. Re:Laptop? by Wellspring · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hi, I'm Troy McClure. You may remember me from such informational films as "Let's Get Ready for the Iridium Standard" and "Tritium: Delicious But Deadly!"

    5. Re:Laptop? by Tanktalus · · Score: 2, Funny

      I really wish I had mod points. There should be a "+1, you referred to sharks with laser beams."

      :-)

  3. Sounds like a Star Trek Episode by alexj33 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mr. LaForge: We're trapped by the aliens!

    Wesley Crusher: Wait! We only need to realize that the sort of atomic structures that generate power when bombarded with high energy electrons are the sort that tend to fall apart when bombarded with high energy electrons.

    Mr. LaForge: That.... could.... destabilize the aliens death ray....!

    Wesley: Yeah, just like in the academy.

    Picard: Make it so.

    1. Re:Sounds like a Star Trek Episode by andphi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Several hundred times a second.

    2. Re:Sounds like a Star Trek Episode by ColdGrits · · Score: 2, Funny

      "But where does reversing the polarity of the electron beam come in?"

      It doesn't.

      However, the 3rd Doctor was oft fond of "reversing the polarity of the neutron flow".

      --
      People should not be afraid of their governments - Governments should be afraid of their people.
  4. ...um.... by i_b_don · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't know about you ... but for ANYTHING radioactive that I'm going to be sticking on my lap I want more than a "modest" amount of shielding thank you very much.

    don

    --
    all language nazi's will burne in heil!
  5. Hold the phone... by R2.0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did an editor ACTUALLY CHECK on the facts of a story before posting?

    Cue the porcine aviators...

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    1. Re:Hold the phone... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's a tenth anniversary thing. The editors are showing is what Slashdot might have been. Tomorrow they'll post a story that is still recent enough to count as news. Next week it will be back to normal.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  6. Back in my day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    When I was young, before the first war, we didn't have them fancy grammar checkers or spelling checkers. When we had a paper due for our teacher, we had to look up the ASCII codes manually (most of us memorized like our multiplication tables) while punching holes in cards to feed into our mechanical computer. The grammar and spelling checker was YOU! We didn't have batteries. We had to power our computers by connecting them to mills near powerful dams. And we liked it! Then we had to manually ink our ribbon before printing. And when we went to school, we often lost our papers because it was so cold. And the roads were uphill both ways!

    Get off my lawn!

    *shakes cane*

    1. Re:Back in my day... by RockoTDF · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, and don't forget you didn't have water either. You had to take the hydrogen, and the oxygen, and mash 'em together! AND YOU WERE GRATEFUL FOR IT!

      --
      There is more to science than physics!

      www.iomalfunction.blogspot.com
    2. Re:Back in my day... by LordVader717 · · Score: 1, Funny

      The grammar and spelling checker was YOU!
      In Soviet Russia, documents spell-check and grammar-check YOU!
    3. Re:Back in my day... by thesandtiger · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pfft. Infant! In MY day we didn't even have days yet. We had to wait for nucleosynthesis and super-novae so we had Oxygen to begin with, and we were *GRATEFUL*.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    4. Re:Back in my day... by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 5, Funny

      OXYGEN? Lucky. Back in MY day there was simply nothing, and after a while it blew up.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  7. Re:The Einstein rule by fredrikj · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, let's call it lawpoop's law. That sounds really good.

  8. Embrace Change by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 5, Funny
    Don't be so afraid of radiation.

    A larger pool of mutants means more chance of a favorable adaptation, right?

    We can't be so selfish - think of the children.

    Everyone talks about evolution but nobody does anything about it.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  9. Re:What pissed me off on that was this assumption: by aproposofwhat · · Score: 2, Funny
    My Lithium's not deadly - it's all that keeps my bipolarity at bay, you insensitive clod!

    --
    One swallow does not a fellatrix make
  10. Re:Cons and wishful thinking by Hatta · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't exaggerate. Plenty of technologies were working fine with tubes. The most significant thing was electrification.

    Well it wasn't great at the start, but then we hooked the tubes up in series.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!