Slashdot Mirror


'30 Year Laptop Battery' is Unscientific Myth

An anonymous reader wrote to mention the wonderful news: "A research group funded by U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory is developing a battery which can provide continuous power to your laptop for 30 years! Betavoltaic power cells are constructed from semiconductors and use radioisotopes as the energy source..." Except, not so much. ZDNet's Mixed Signals blog with Rupert Goodwins explains why (as always) if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is: "The sort of atomic structures that generate power when bombarded with high energy electrons are the sort that tend to fall apart when bombarded with high energy electrons. While solar cells have the same problem, it's to a much lesser extent. There's a lot of research into making materials that don't suffer so much, but it remains a serious issue ... while it's true that a tritium-powered battery will eventually turn into an inert, safe lump of nothing much, and while it's also true that a modest amount of shielding will keep the radioactivity within the the battery the while, there's the small problem that if you break the battery during its life the nasties come out."

11 of 322 comments (clear)

  1. I think.. by z0idberg · · Score: 4, Funny

    the nastiest came out and broke your grammar checker.

    1. Re:I think.. by z0idberg · · Score: 4, Funny

      and my preview button.

  2. Laptop? by The+Aethereal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, my lap is exactly where I want to put something radioactive.

  3. Sounds like a Star Trek Episode by alexj33 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mr. LaForge: We're trapped by the aliens!

    Wesley Crusher: Wait! We only need to realize that the sort of atomic structures that generate power when bombarded with high energy electrons are the sort that tend to fall apart when bombarded with high energy electrons.

    Mr. LaForge: That.... could.... destabilize the aliens death ray....!

    Wesley: Yeah, just like in the academy.

    Picard: Make it so.

  4. ...um.... by i_b_don · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't know about you ... but for ANYTHING radioactive that I'm going to be sticking on my lap I want more than a "modest" amount of shielding thank you very much.

    don

    --
    all language nazi's will burne in heil!
  5. Hold the phone... by R2.0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did an editor ACTUALLY CHECK on the facts of a story before posting?

    Cue the porcine aviators...

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  6. Back in my day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    When I was young, before the first war, we didn't have them fancy grammar checkers or spelling checkers. When we had a paper due for our teacher, we had to look up the ASCII codes manually (most of us memorized like our multiplication tables) while punching holes in cards to feed into our mechanical computer. The grammar and spelling checker was YOU! We didn't have batteries. We had to power our computers by connecting them to mills near powerful dams. And we liked it! Then we had to manually ink our ribbon before printing. And when we went to school, we often lost our papers because it was so cold. And the roads were uphill both ways!

    Get off my lawn!

    *shakes cane*

    1. Re:Back in my day... by thesandtiger · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pfft. Infant! In MY day we didn't even have days yet. We had to wait for nucleosynthesis and super-novae so we had Oxygen to begin with, and we were *GRATEFUL*.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    2. Re:Back in my day... by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 5, Funny

      OXYGEN? Lucky. Back in MY day there was simply nothing, and after a while it blew up.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  7. Re:The Einstein rule by fredrikj · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, let's call it lawpoop's law. That sounds really good.

  8. Embrace Change by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 5, Funny
    Don't be so afraid of radiation.

    A larger pool of mutants means more chance of a favorable adaptation, right?

    We can't be so selfish - think of the children.

    Everyone talks about evolution but nobody does anything about it.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.