DHS Injects Itself With DDoS
An anonymous reader writes "Here's a story about what can happen to any enterprise IT department that overestimates the intelligence of its users. Only in this case, the enterprise in question is the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The spokesman says there's no Jack Bauer mentality. No kidding!"
lol, happened at college all the time
you get 5-6 idiots that reply to all
then you get 50-60 idiots telling them not to reply to all
and 50-60 more idiots trying to have a conversation to the first 5-6 idiots
Yeah, a mailing list with a lot of people hitting "reply all" really isn't the same as a DDoS attack...it's just a mailing list with a lot of people hitting "reply all"
ZuluPad, the wiki notepad on crack
Several were group email accounts at Security Operations Centers, NOCs, and I think I saw a few power plants as well(one woman said that is was the "Command Center", speaking about the operations center at a major insurance company. Not to mention I'm still getting unanswerable emails back from email servers giving me the exact email address. I'd estimate I have around 1000 sets of contact information for people in the security industry, how many of those are actual LOGINS as well?
I'll put up a page with a breakdown of the information in the next week, then maybe Slashdot will put up my submission "DHS Email List Exposes Private User Data".
~Sticky
/Grousing about rejected submissions is typically offtopic.
//Which is why I said some other stuff first.
Yeah, a mailing list with a lot of people hitting "reply all" really isn't the same as a DDoS attack...it's just a mailing list with a lot of people hitting "reply all"
:D
Not on Microsoft infrastructure. It's called a cascade failure and if it happens to you all of your Exchange servers will go down. All of them.
1. All Exchange Servers fail --> All Outlook instances lock up, Word freezes, and desktops generally become unstable.
2. Panic ensues.
3. Someone calls a consultant
4. Profit!
If everything is set up correctly it shouldn't happen. But I hardly ever find that everything is setup correctly.
I recently pointed this out to a friend of mine... here's the full list:
President Highest office served, executive preferred
GWB Governor
Clinton Governor
GHWB Vice President
Reagan Governor
Carter Governor
Ford Vice President
Nixon Vice President
LB Johnson Vice President
Kennedy Senator
Eisenhower General (Supreme Commander of Allied Forces)
Truman Vice President
FDR Governor
Hoover Secretary of Commerce
Coolidge Vice President/Governor
Harding Lt. Governor
Wilson Governor
Taft Governor, Chief Justice
TR Vice President, Governor
McKinley Governor
Cleveland President
Harrison Senator
Cleveland Governor
McArthur Vice President
Garfield General, US Representative
Hayes Governor
Grant General
A Johnson Vice President
Lincoln US Represenative
Buchanan Secretary of State, Senator
Pierce General, Senator
Fillmore Vice President
Taylor General
Polk Governor
Tyler Vice President, Governor
Harrison General, military Governor
Van Buren Vice President, Governor
Jackson General, military Govneror
JQ Adams Secretary of State, Senator
Monroe Governor
Madison Secretary of State, numerous founding documents
Jefferson Vice President, Governor, that whole Declaration thing
John Adams Vice President, lots of pre-Revolution stuff
Washington Uh, General who won our independence
Vice President or Governor: 29 (including the last 8 Presidents)
General: 6
Non-VP cabinet member: 4
Congressman with no executive experience: 3
That's a 3/42 (7.14%) historical chance of a Senator being elected
President with no executive experience.
Yeah, side note before I get called out on it... there have been 43 presidents, but Cleveland served as two different numbers (22 and 24) so his previous experience only counts once.
Don't leave your mind so open that your brain falls out. Don't close it so much that you cut off the blood.