Video-on-Demand Success in France Deters Piracy
njondet writes "The Hollywood Reporter reports that TF1, the French broadcaster of the hit TV show 'Heroes' has welcomed the success of its video-on-demand (VOD) offering. The service allows French internet users to watch episodes of the second season of Heroes just 24 hours after their original US broadcast. With more than
50,000 paid viewings of the first episode in three days, it is by far the most successful VOD product in France. And although these figures still pale in comparison with the estimated 1.5 million illegal downloads per episode for the first season in France, TF1 is confident that it is building a viable alternative to piracy."
Not at the current price of 3 euros (4.2 US$) by episode !!
Let's say the whole season has 24 episodes, it costs 72 euros (101 US$) for viewing the whole season through this system! More or less twice the price than a DVD boxset, but here you download only DRM-emcumbered files that you are allowed to play FOR JUST 48 HOURS [then you have to repay].
@neonux
I actually figured this out a while ago.
1.5 million people jump through hoops to get unauthorized copies of something they can't get any other way. What do you do?
You start selling it to them legitimately. It's genius. It's so brilliant it's diabolical. The people will never see it coming.
Breakfast served all day!
I have said it before, and will say it again. If companies had got on the ball from the beginning, taken care of licensing concerns and charged REASONABLE rates for VOD ( nothing I have seen so far has led me to believe that every pair of eyeballs is really pulling in $2-4 in advertising revenue) they wouldn't be looking at a fraction of the piracy they see right now.
Maybe instead of those trailers that talk about how the men and women working on films are getting put out of work by pirates, they should start talking about how many are put out of work by GREED. They have really messed things up by only looking at technological progress as a way to extract even more money from consumers, rather then the boon for both it should have been.