Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Unreal Tournament 3 Performance Revealed

Posted by Zonk on from the winning-the-tourney dept.

Vigile writes "The Unreal Tournament 3 demo will be dropping sometime in the next two weeks. With a launch on the PC, PS3, Xbox 360 and even an in-box Linux client it will definitely be one of the most widely-played titles this holiday. With an early take on the UT3 demo's performance, PC Perspective has put up an article that compares cards from NVIDIA and AMD in both single and dual-GPU configurations to see which are the best performers. It turns out that even mid-range cards are going to be more than capable of playing UT3 at impressive image quality levels."

5 of 85 comments (clear)

  1. Re:UT3 vs. TF2 by Puff+of+Logic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are only a few differences between TFC and TF2... I'm curious why people are so amazed at TF2 when it is a dumbed down version of TFC. Not to say I don't like TF2, it's just that as a TFC addict for 8 years it's amazing that people didn't know about this game... See, I can appreciate your sentiments, but I really hate to hear people use the phrase "dumbed-down" with respect to games (that said, it is certainly applicable in some cases). In my view, TF2 is a distillation of all that is good about team-based shooters, with very little of the annoying crap. Perhaps TF2 is "dumbed-down" in the same way that WoW is "dumbed-down" in many people's eyes, but in both instances I think these games have tried to simply get rid of a lot of the annoying crap seen in their respective genres. WoW has been mind-boggling successful because of this, and I believe that TF2 will enjoy the same sort of success (although obviously on a much smaller level numbers-wise).

    I suppose the question you might ask yourself is not why people didn't know about TFC (which presumably most of us did), but why TF2 is enjoying such a positive response. While you note that there are only a few differences between TF2 and TFC, I put it to you that those differences are fundamental to this positive response.

    cheers.
    --
    P.P.S. I'm doing Science and I'm still alive.
  2. Poor card coverage IMO by MrBandersnatch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Game performance reviews that just target the latest cards annoy me now. A quick look at http://www.steampowered.com/status/survey.html shows that the latest ATI and NVidia card represent about 6-7% of users. While doing a wider range of cards obviously takes longer, looking at performance on the most popular cards of the last gen would sure be informative.

  3. Re:Linux but no Mac? by Solra+Bizna · · Score: 3, Insightful

    there are license and development tool complications for porting to the Mac.

    Ummmm... like what?

    On Linux, you have the option of GCC and SDL. On OSX, you have the option of... GCC and SDL. I'm not seeing the complications here.

    -:sigma.SB

    P.S. 2k4 for Mac used SDL.

    --
    WARN
    THERE IS ANOTHER SYSTEM
  4. Re:Linux but no Mac? by SirTalon42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sounds like you didn't buy UT2004. They did a great job of packaging it, having a nice GUI installer, and quite stable (including supporting installing it for just the current user or system wide).

  5. OMFG!! by MrBandersnatch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Whoever designed the front end UI needs SLAPPING. Hard. Very hard. And often.