Slashdot Mirror


Airlines Have to Ask Permission to Fly 72 Hours Early

twitter wrote to mention that the TSA (Transport Security Administration) has released a new set of proposed rules that is raising quite a stir among groups ranging from the ACLU to the American Society of Travel Agents. Under the new rules airlines would be required to submit a passenger manifest (including full name, sex, date of birth, and redress number) for all flights departing, arriving, or flying over the United States at least 72 hours prior to departure. Boarding passes will only be issued to those passengers that have been cleared. "Hasbrouck submitted that requiring clearance in order to travel violates the US First Amendment right of assembly, the central claim in John Gilmore's case against the US government over the requirement to show photo ID for domestic travel. [...] ACLU's Barry Steinhardt quoted press reports of 500,000 to 750,000 people on the watch list (of which the no-fly list is a subset). 'If there are that many terrorists in the US, we'd all be dead.' TSA representative Kip Hawley noted that the list has been carefully investigated and halved over the last year. 'Half of grossly bloated is still bloated,' Steinhardt replied."

24 of 596 comments (clear)

  1. say goodbuy by russ1337 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Say goodbye to last minute business travel = say goodbye to important meetings = say goodbye to business dealings = say goodbye to the economy...

    1. Re:say goodbuy by igjeff · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How about saying goodbye to flying to a funeral.

      They're really gonna expect people to get cleared 72 hours in advance to go to their mother's funeral (to pick an example)?

      Well, I guess they (TPTB at the TSA) continue to demonstrate how utterly clueless they are.

    2. Re:say goodbuy by griffjon · · Score: 4, Insightful
      First, you can still book on short notice; this 72 hour lead time is just to get the bulk of the clearance out of the way (claim the TSA):

      ...unless the individual makes a reservation within 72 hours of the scheduled flight departure time, changes a flight within
      72 hours of the scheduled flight departure time, or requests to enter a sterile area upon arrival at the airport.

      In such cases, TSA would require covered aircraft operators to send the required information to TSA immediately. TSA, in coordination with the TSC where necessary, would compare the passenger and non-traveler information obtained from each covered
      aircraft operator to information contained in the watch list.


      but they did manage to sneak in additional papers-please wording:

      Not issue to an individual a boarding pass or authorization to enter a sterile area or permit an individual to board an aircraft or enter a sterile area if the individual does not provide a verifying identity document when requested under circumstances described above, unless otherwise authorized by TSA.


      It's still bad, and hasslesome, and invasive of privacy, but not outright bullet-in-foot material.
      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    3. Re:say goodbuy by walt-sjc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or seeing your father one last time BEFORE he dies.

      Yep - totally clueless. And before someone suggests it, I should not have to provide the government a REASON why I want to travel on a moment's notice. We should not have to make exceptions for something so wrong.

  2. oh boy by NiceGeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Knowing exactly when and where someone is traveling to with 72 hours notice...naw this will never be abused.

  3. Re:Your payperz, plezz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It's gonna get posted 50 times, so I might as well get it out of the way. (Posted AC for no karma whoring.)

    Capt. Vasili Borodin: I will live in Montana. And I will marry a round American woman and raise rabbits, and she will cook them for me. And I will have a pickup truck... maybe even a "recreational vehicle." And drive from state to state. Do they let you do that?
    Captain Ramius: I suppose.
    Capt. Vasili Borodin: No papers?
    Captain Ramius: No papers, state to state.
  4. Missed flights? by WPIDalamar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How many people have missed their flight and caught a later one the same day?

    Imagine being stuck 3 days before you can go home.

  5. This is just what Bin Laden wants by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The TSA seems to be doing all it can to kill the U.S. economy by making travel even more of a nightmare. I know plenty of business travelers that don't know their schedule 72 hours in advance -- they go where ever they are needed when ever they are needed. The more red tape a country throws down at the border, the less business that people will do here.

    I'm sure bin Laden is laughing in his cave right now. He's used a classic martial arts move -- using the strength of the opponent against the opponent. Bin Laden wants to the isolate the U.S. from the world and the TSA is doing a great job of that.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  6. I'll Defund TSA, if Elected. by tjstork · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These guys do not deserve to have a budget. If a terrorist tries to take over your plane, you get up and kick his ass. No need for all this fear mongering and travel inconvenience. It's just make work for security contractors that does absolutely nothing. The best guarantee of your safety are your fists, and not someone elses forms.

    --
    This is my sig.
  7. Send a Message - Don't Fly by Knight+of+Shadows · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They can have my privacy when they pry it out of my cold, dead, fingers. It's simple, folks. Don't fly. I know, I know, we all want to line up at the gates to the abattoir like good little government programmed automatons, but this will do nothing but show them we deserve jackboots kicking in our doors. Do the right thing. Just don't buy their crap. Don't fly. When the airlines start losing money out the ass, then maybe they'll see we're not to be made victims due to idiot fundamentalist extremists, or government abuse of power, or to said government's inability to protect anyone. Hit them where it hurts, folks: in the pocketbook. I'm willing to bet that if over 200 million Americans decided not to fly for a few months, you'd see them scramble to change things.

  8. I REFUSE to be afraid by RaigetheFury · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hate laws like these. They promote the current trend of being afraid. That's the whole goal of terrorists. It costs so much more to operate an airline now. Millions upon millions of people fly ever year. You have more of a chance of dying in a car crash than dying in a plane. But you never hear that statistic when you see a "Horrible plane crash!" news line.

    I refuse to be afraid of this. I refuse to support any measure that would protect me 1% more if it took away my rights. This does that. I refuse to live my life afraid of dying when it takes me 2 hours to get through airline security when it should take 20minutes max.

    I don't travel by plane at all anymore because of this. I go to Canada once per year and now I HAVE to get a passport because of paranoid people.

    Stop being afraid, start defending your rights or we're going to end up needing permission to travel between states.

  9. 500,000 to 750,000 Terrorists in The US? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So let me get this straight. There are 500,000 to 750,000 suspected terrorists in this country, yet we haven't had a major attack since 9/11/2001?

    There are 300M people in the US. Are you seriously telling me that at least 1 in 600 is on a terrorist watch list?

    Something tells me that getting onto a terrorist watch list involves something other than being a terrorist. Otherwise, this just doesn't make any sense.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  10. Re:Back in the day when I was the young guy by ChronosWS · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't *even* suggest this. If you have gotten to this point in your thinking, move to China because that's where stuff like this is supposed to happen, not here.

  11. Re:Sensationalist Headline by walt-sjc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The government has a habit of proposing something and then implementing it. They very rarely make proposals without intending to implement it.

    The point is that now is the time for feedback. You can't give feedback on something you don't know about.

    Say, you don't work for the government do you? Sure don't want those pesky private citizens allowed to influence potential new regulations or laws that affect them, right? I mean the NERVE of some people - thinking that the government works for the citizens...

  12. Re:Back in the day when I was the young guy by crankyspice · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or even just unexpected commercial trips; I recently flew to Las Vegas in a rented Cessna that didn't pass pre-flight when I went to take off (bad magnetos). I left the bird with the local FBO mechanic and got a ride to McCarran (I was at Henderson), booking a Southwest flight back to L.A. from my Treo during the drive over, as I had to be back in L.A. later that day for an important meeting.

    Shit like this will cripple America...

    --
    geek. lawyer.
  13. Too bad for derieved relatives by einhverfr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When my father-in-law passed away, we had to take a flight the day after we heard the news. My wife is from Indonesia, and it was about a 30-hour plane trip to get there. Adding 72 hours to this would simply be unacceptable as it would likely have caused us to miss the funeral (in Indonesia, it is custom to have an open casket memorial lasting for up to 3-4 days and then bury the body-- this starts almost immediately after the body has been embalmed).

    Seems like time to write to Congress.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  14. Get over it. The terrorists have won. by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Yeah, yeah, mark me troll. Whatever.


    The fact remains that the very thing we keep hearing those 'trrists' hate, freedom, is essentially dead in this country. For all the talk of how we're supposedly spreading freedom to an occupied country, it's just that, talk, since this administration is hell bent on destroying those very same freedoms in this country.

    Between this newest revelation to track when people go on flights, requiring a national ID card, listening to our phone conversations without a warrant to preventing people from paying their bills until the source of their money is ok'd, we no longer live in a truly free society.

    Oh sure, I can write this without fear of being arrested, but can I go on a flight without being classified as a threat? What does the file the FBI (and at least one other three-letter agency) have on me (and they do) say?

    Bin Laden and his cohorts are probably laughing* in their cave at how they've succeeded in their first goal of undermining our society. How many times a week do we hear about law enforcement going into apoplectic seizures when someone thinks they saw some shifty character hanging around somewhere or an innocent package left behind shuts down some place?

    It's a sad state of affairs when the people of this country don't care that their right to be free has been taken away from them. After all, there's those un-reality shows to watch. That the people who only a decade or so ago were crowing about how America is the greatest country on the planet, with all kinds of freedoms not enjoyed by many other countries, are now so willing to go along with this administration's excuses about why the rights enshrined in the Constitution must be taken away to protect them.

    The quote about give them an inch and they'll take a mile certainly applies to this administration. Even worse, whoever comes into power next won't have the balls to undo the vast majority of wrongs being perpetrated against society but will instead be more concerned about getting re-elected than serving the people.

    The rights of the Constitution had a good run of what, over two hundred years? Not bad all things considered. Now though, we are moving into a new era which will require citizens to involuntarily give up rights which have existed since the founding of the country in an effort to defeat terrorism. It will be a long, never-ending battle but by giving up our rights and acquiescing to the newest form a facist police-like-state, we can be assured that we will be safe and secure in our wiretapped, surveillanced, dwellings.

    * I'm assuming that like most leaders, the rules they want to impose on others does not apply to them

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  15. Re:Back in the day when I was the young guy by CyberLord+Seven · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Sir, I realise that your post was in jest; however, I would like suggest an easy alternative.

    We should just mark all patriotic Am3rican$ with a simple mark. Something simple like...oh, I dunno', maybe a six, three score, and six.

    Without this mark, no one would be allowed to travel. Besides curtailing the nefarious schemes of terrorists it would also help with the large immigration problem. In time, as the populace surrendered to the most excellent goals of this process, it could easily be extended to other activities such as the buying and selling of goods.

    --
    We have always been at war with Eurasia!
  16. I hate to throw a brink in the arguement... by Samalie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...but the document linked in TFA states clearly that airlines have to provide said data to the TSA 72 hours before departure for all confirmed passengers they have...this doesn't mean that you can't book a ticket under 72 hours, or get on that plane. They realized that 90% or so of passengers are booked over 72 hours to departure, and that way they can clean up the last-minute fliers faster.

    That being said, its still bullshit, without a doubt. But its NOT going to stop last-minute fliers from being able to fly.

    And again, its not that this isn't complete horseshit, but they're already passing your infromation to the TSA - they're just doing it within 15 minutes of departure now (or 15 minutes after departure for international flights).

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  17. Re:Requirement is 30 min before flight by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Okay, either A. the TSA really needs three days for clearance because they do hand checking, or B. they do an automated check and don't need that time. Let's examine each case.

    If it really takes 72 hours to check someone out thoroughly, then they can't realistically let people be added to flights after that. Otherwise, the terrorists will just book at the last minute and will be checked more quickly and will have a much greater chance of getting missed in the rush.

    If it doesn't really take 72 hours to check somebody out, then the TSA is just bullying the airlines into doing extra work, thus raising the cost of travel for everybody with no actual benefit.

    I fail to see the upside here.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  18. Re:Requirement is 30 min before flight by DragonWriter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I fail to see the upside here.


    The upside is it helps break the expectation of freedom and get people used to the idea that every action must be pre-cleared by the government, which reduces the probability of strenuous objection to future intrusive policies.

    Admittedly, though, that's only an "upside" from a certain perspective.
  19. Re:Back in the day when I was the young guy by Phylarr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And here are some numbers that I find also help to put the whole terrorism thing in perspective:

    Deaths in the U.S. in 2001 due to
    heart disease - 700,000
    cancer - 553,800
    stroke - 164,000
    accidents - 102,000 (Car accidents - 42,000)
    influenza - 36,000
    terrorism - 3,000

    Where is the war on cancer, or the war on drunk driving? You're more likely to die driving to the airport than on the plane.

    --
    "Choosing to refrain from producing another person demonstrates a profound love for all life" [vhemt.org]
  20. What useability - in fact, what security? by j_w_d · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What I am curious about is this: how many legitimate security threats have been stopped by the regulations in place now? We know they go after nursing mothers, girls with techno-trash style sense, sick people with serious, life threatening conditions, etc. I've also seen them stop people with jars of maple syrup, pickles and other substances, and once even an idiot muling drugs from Canada to Chicago. But, again, how many REAL terrorist style bad guys have we heard about them taking down? By my count, admittedly incomplete though it is, the number is very close to if not actually equal to zero. Then there are those really silly things like the "no-fly" lists. They check your name!! How many real bad guys are going to use their real names? I can just see it, "Name, please? Hmm? Oh, I'm Carlos the Jackal. Sorry, sir, could you step over here? You are on our no-fly list." Seriously, now.

    --
    ------ The only greater hazard to your liberty than n politicians is n+1 politicians.
  21. Re:Back in the day when I was the young guy by PMBjornerud · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Where did you get your hand on such propaganda?!? Come with us, please.

    Why the hell are you trying to make excuses for the terrorists? You're no true patriot. We can only hope that in a few years, spreading misinformation like this will be outlawed. ...

    When I was a kid, 20 years ago, my world view was that the only country in the world where people would be stopped because of their papers and turned back with no reason, - was the Sovjet Union and its vassal states.

    Submit my name 3 days before travel and maybe be refused on short notice? Sovjet. Hearing stories about small issues in immigration escalating and you ending up being sent back? Sovjet.

    You're still a good country. Please don't become a bad one...

    --
    I lost my sig.