Slashdot Mirror


Simon Pegg to Play Scotty

In response to yesterday's casting news about Chris Pine possibly taking the captain's chair for the new Star Trek movie, apparently Simon Pegg will be playing the role of Scotty. Simon Pegg is known for his role as Shaun in Shaun of the Dead and more recently for his leading role in Hot Fuzz. "Pegg joins Zoe Saldana as Uhura, Anton Yelchin as Chekov, John Cho as Sulu and Zachary Quinto as Spock in the film which reportedly, and logically, 'chronicles the early days of the Enterprise crew.' Leonard Nimoy will also put in an appearance, while Eric Bana signed up this week as the movie's villain, Nero."

48 of 233 comments (clear)

  1. The name is Shaun, not Sean! by F-3582 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    www.imdb.com is your friend.

    1. Re:The name is Shaun, not Sean! by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Other acceptable titles are:
      • L' Alba dei morti dementi
      • Muertos de risa
      • Shaun dei morti
      • Shaun et les zombies
      • Shaun of the Dead
      • Shaun of the Dead - Ein Zombie kommt selten allein
      • Tea-Time of the Dead
      • Todo Mundo Quase Morto
      • Ein Zombie kommt selten allein
      • Zombies Party

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    2. Re:The name is Shaun, not Sean! by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 4, Funny
      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  2. Oh noes by KEnderK · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Shat is really going to hit the fan now!

  3. English Scotty??? by lobiusmoop · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a Scotsman, I'm somewhat miffed that an Englishman is playing the role... This is almost as bad as Mel Gibson (an Ozzie) playing William Wallace for goodness sake!

    --
    "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
    1. Re:English Scotty??? by Asshat+Canada · · Score: 3, Informative

      Doohan was Canadian

    2. Re:English Scotty??? by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 2, Informative

      > This is almost as bad as Mel Gibson (an Ozzie) playing William Wallace

      Mel Gibson, the "aussie", who was born in new york.

    3. Re:English Scotty??? by Kelson · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, and they cast a human as Spock! Given how underrepresented Vulcans are in the entertainment industry (I challenge you to name one, just one Oscar winner), it's only logical that they should cast a full Vulcan in that role!

    4. Re:English Scotty??? by soundonsound · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Brothers and sisters are natural enemies! Like Englishmen and Scots! Or Welshmen and Scots! Or Japanese and Scots! Or Scots and other Scots! Damned Scots! They ruined Scotland!"

      -"You Scots sure are a contentious people."

      "You just made an enemy for life!"

    5. Re:English Scotty??? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 5, Funny
      I do believe a one Albert Gore is Vulcan, is he not?

      Lets see:
      1. Vulcan Attributes
      2. Enjoys Science - Check
      3. Emotionless robot - Double Check
      4. Uses Logic to save the earth -Triple Check
      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    6. Re:English Scotty??? by some+damn+guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I used to laugh at Al Gore jokes... until Dec 2000 or so...

      Just haven't been as funny these last 7 years... dunno what it is...

  4. let it die by kylemonger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hate to say it but this isn't 1977. Your typical Trek fan has been gorged to satiety on Star Trek TV and movies. And considering the last efforts, the execrable "Nemesis" and TV's "Enterprise", nausea might be a better word for it than satiety. The cast is irrelevant at this point. Trek must be allowed to die instead of continuing in this horrible parody of life.

    1. Re:let it die by jgarra23 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I heard they cancelled Enterprise when Mr. Bakula started calling his tricorder "Ziggy"

    2. Re:let it die by moderatorrater · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Apparently they've started from scratch on everyone working on this so that there's the slightest chance of this being a decent movie.

      What I don't understand is why we need a story on every single person that's cast for a role. Do you think that, maybe in a week, we can just post one story on the entire cast instead?

    3. Re:let it die by B3ryllium · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Go watch both seasons of Spaced, and then you'll realize why this news deserves its own article on Slashdot :)

    4. Re:let it die by Belacgod · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bond started sucking when they ran out of Ian Fleming novels. Casino Royale, being originally written by Fleming, restored the guiding force to the series. Expect it to suck again now that they're out of books again.

    5. Re:let it die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I spent three seasons wondering why he didn't jump back.

      I mean, he solved the problem, every week. He's supposed to jump back then and leave the real captain behind, right?

  5. And Korean Sulu by richdun · · Score: 2, Informative

    And a Korean Sulu - John Cho was born in Seoul.

    1. Re:And Korean Sulu by porcupine8 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You think that's bad? I hear Zachary Quinto is from Earth. Pssh.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  6. Re:Shatner is the greatest by JustinKSU · · Score: 2, Funny

    What do you want, Jim Carrey?

  7. Re:Shatner is the greatest by moderatorrater · · Score: 3, Funny

    Say what you will about William Shatner That sounds like a big fat challenge...kind of like shatner...
  8. Impossible. by khasim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem with making a Star Trek Babies movie is that there is absolutely NO THREAT to any of the characters.

    So what if baby Kirk is shot in the head causing him to fall into an erupting volcano at the moment the planet's sun goes nova?

    It was all a dream sequence. Or it was a clone. Or a robot. Or the evil baby Kirk from the mirror dimension.

    And the more characters you take from TOS, the less the threat is.

    It's going to be like there's a HUGE TARGET painted on the one person on the bridge that isn't in TOS. And here is chief security office Ima Goingtodie.

    1. Re:Impossible. by Generic+Guy · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's going to be like there's a HUGE TARGET painted on the one person on the bridge that isn't in TOS. And here is chief security office Ima Goingtodie.

      Well, as long as he's wearing the requisite red shirt...

      --
      { - Generic Guy - }
    2. Re:Impossible. by pluther · · Score: 2
      The problem with making a Star Trek Babies movie is that there is absolutely NO THREAT to any of the characters.

      Well, I'd say there are many, many problems with making such a movie, but I don't know if a complete lack of threat is one of them.

      I mean, did you, at any moment, think that any of the characters in the original movies were actually going to die?

      And even when one did, did you expect him to stay dead?

      Besides, it's grand Star Trek tradition anyway:

      "Kirk, Spock, McCoy, and Ensign Gomez beam down to a planet. Guess which one isn't coming back."

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    3. Re:Impossible. by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem with making a Star Trek Babies movie is that there is absolutely NO THREAT to any of the characters.


      Is this really an issue? I mean, seriously, was there such a threat in the series (any of them) to anyone but anonymous redshirts? None of the major cast were killed off during the series except Tasha Yar. Really, the Trek format isn't about serious threats (from the audience point of view) to major characters, even though there are occasionally such threats from the characters POV.

      Yeah, so we know they aren't going to pull (without breaking continuity, which perhaps shouldn't be considered inconceivable in a Star Trek prequel) a TWoK -- if only because reversing it in a subsequent movie has been done before; but then how many times in hundreds of TV episodes and dozens of movies has a major character death (or departure to join the Q, whatever) happened in Trek anyway? The rare occasion when it does happen it gets its power from the fact that the fans "know" its not going to happen, even if the overt situation is one which seriously threatens it.

      So, really, I don't think much is lost by making that slightly more inconceivable than normal.
    4. Re:Impossible. by raehl · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is the show that gave us the term, "red shirt," after all.

      I thought that was from College Football.

      Note for Star Trek Fans: Football is a form of athletic contest between two groups of players, each group fielding twelve* players at one time. The game is divided into a series of downs, where each team lines up on opposite sides of a brown ball called a 'football', and one group tries to take the ball and advance it past the other group, by carying or throwing the ball, without getting tackled. If they advance it far enough, they get more attempts, and eventually score. But if they don't advance the ball at least 10 yards in 4 tries, the opposing team gets the ball.

      Secondary Note for Star Trek Fans: An 'Athletic Contest' is an event in which multiple participants compete under a set of rules designed to compare the relative motor skills and/or strength/endurance possessed by the participants, although many athletic contests also include a strategy component.

      * If you are not a Star Trek fan, shhhhh.

    5. Re:Impossible. by Mahjub+Sa'aden · · Score: 5, Informative

      And for non-American nerds, Football is a team sport played between two teams of 11 players. It is the most popular sport in the world. Football is a ball game played on a rectangular grass or artificial turf field, with a goal at each of the short ends. The object of the game is to score by manoeuvring the ball into the opposing goal. In general play, the goalkeeper is the only player allowed to use their hands or arms to propel the ball; the rest of the team usually use their feet to kick the ball into position, occasionally using their torso or head to intercept a ball in mid air. The team that scores the most goals by the end of the match wins.

      Thank you, Wikipedia.

      --
      What is is all that is. Isn't that obvious?
    6. Re:Impossible. by oldmanpanda · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't patronize us. We've all seen episode #45, The Gamesters of Triskelion.

  9. I might just give this a chance... by downix · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When I heard of the movie project, I could do nothing but groan. "No more, Nemesis and Enterprise ruined it" was my thought. The franchise had been going down ever since the Dominion war in DS9. But, as time went on, and more details came out, I paused, and thought on it a bit. Rather than rehashing an existing concept, or trying to "expand" with jelly-sex-rubdown scenes, the producer is actually trying to reinvigorate things, but not by some highbrow concept that blew up in our faces with Enterprise and Voyager, but with a return to what makes the show stick with us after all of these years. It wasn't the TNG intellectualism, or the DS9 anti-heroism, or Voyagers attempt at survivalism, or Enterprises horrible attempt at merging all 3. It was the original series, sticking to the basic storytelling engine based on classic westerns, using Freudian psychology paired with Jung archetypes, all with the "Bandwagon to the Stars." By ripping away the layers of overdone polish and returning to the core essence of the show, then maybe, just maybe there stands a chance. Every casting choice made shows a deep understanding of this core concept. The actor choices being ideal canidates for the archetype or the psychological core element of the role being played. This gives me hope for the series I have not held for a very long time.

    --
    Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
  10. Stop it already - Let Kirk rest in peace! by NJVil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is the science fiction genre so fscking bankrupt for ideas that it needs to rehash ToS? ToS was a good enough series in its time, but who is this abomination of a movie designed to appeal to? What demographic wants to see this? Who wants to see Kirk played by anyone but Shatner? The man has all but ruined the role for anyone else. Why not take these actors and cast them in roles they can make their own instead of hamstringing them with the legacies of Nimoy and Shatner?

    It's just like the abysmally stupid "Bionic Woman" nonsense; some bonehead executive decided to trot an old standard (for which some people have nostalgia) of carbonite and to "reimagine" it for a new generation... whatever the hell that means... Or the moronic Underdog movie. Or one of any other cinematic turds splattered across the big screen in the past few years. Damn.

    There have been worlds of awesome science fiction written in the past few years that could easily be adopted to the big screen. For example, "The Golden Compass" is being released this winter and looks promising. However, what do we usually get? More of the same unimaginative crap that's driven people away from the major networks and theatres.

    1. Re:Stop it already - Let Kirk rest in peace! by Scrameustache · · Score: 3, Insightful

      From my admittedly small sample size of three, people familiar with the trademark are not pleased with this. And the chances that, sooner or later, these three people will pay good money to see it are... what, 100%?
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  11. Wrong guy to do Montgomery Scott. by MsGeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Get a REAL Scot to do it. Ewan McGregor for the win. Sure, it would mean paying him silly money for it, but it would mean Ewan would get to leave his mark on not just one, but the EXACTA of geek icon movie series.

    Besides, Scotty always seemed older than everyone except Bones McCoy on TOS.

    Although one thing...could Ewan still do the thick-as-porridge Scots brogue he did in "Trainspotting" that required anyone not from north of Hadrian's Wall to put the closed-captioning on when watching the movie? One wonders.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:Wrong guy to do Montgomery Scott. by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Funny
      Get a REAL Scot to do it. Ewan McGregor for the win.

      Cast Obi-Wan Kenobi as Chief Engineer Montgomery Scott?

      You do realise you just exploded the brains of at least two distinct sets of geeks, right?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Wrong guy to do Montgomery Scott. by Darinbob · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Get a REAL Scot to do it. Ewan McGregor for the win.

      The drawback is if Ewan insisted on doing another nude scene.
    3. Re:Wrong guy to do Montgomery Scott. by DudeTheMath · · Score: 5, Informative

      Besides, Scotty always seemed older than everyone except Bones McCoy on TOS.

      Give MsGeek a cigar! For completeness: In 1966, Doohan and Kelley turned 46, Shatner and Nimoy 35, Barrett and Nichols 34, Koenig 30, and Takei 29. I had forgotten how much older than the others Doohan was until I checked IMDB last week (The Blonde & I were rooting for Paul McGillion). If we're shooting for "eight years before" ST:TOS, Pegg is just the right age (and so is Pine, who's 27). Spock, of course, doesn't age the way humans do, so should be played by someone just about Nimoy's age; Quinto just turned 30, so that's not too far off. Yelchin is 18, which isn't too far off, but Cho is 35! Well, as long as he looks the part....

      --
      You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
    4. Re:Wrong guy to do Montgomery Scott. by MsGeek · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dude, as a heterosexual female I do not see this as a drawback. Far from it actually.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    5. Re:Wrong guy to do Montgomery Scott. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're pretty. Will you be my girlfriend?

    6. Re:Wrong guy to do Montgomery Scott. by Tastecicles · · Score: 2, Funny

      In other news, Nicole Kidman to play Yeoman Rand. We're all boned.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    7. Re:Wrong guy to do Montgomery Scott. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is why we can't have nice things.

    8. Re:Wrong guy to do Montgomery Scott. by sqldr · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude, as a heterosexual female

      what, on slashdot? naaaaaah...

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
  12. Re:Shatner is the greatest by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Those who mock the Shatner, those who dub him 'cheesy' or 'over the top' should ask themselves this: at what point during his performance of Kirk do you ever, even for one second, doubt that you are watching the captain of the starship Enterprise?

    Shatner - like Doohan - is a method actor. When the camera is on him, he actually believes that he is in command of a starship, and his belief is what drags us kicking and screaming along with him. Love him or hate him, you could never catch him playing it at one iota less than warp 9. This new guy? Pwwwpt. He's just an actor. He's not the captain of the Enterprise.

    Shatner. Is. Kirk.

    Star Trek: The Documentary Series era. Is. Shatner.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  13. Re:Shatner is the greatest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Shatner. Is. Kirk.

    Indeed.

  14. Eric Bana? by Cloud+K · · Score: 3, Funny

    When Eric eats a Banana he becomes....

  15. Re:different take on Scotty by Schemat1c · · Score: 4, Funny

    I read somewhere that James Doohan actually faked his accent while playing "Scotty"... How strange that it wasn't his own accent. It's almost like he was... acting?
    --

    "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
  16. Re:Script Link by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would like to see Nick Frost deliver that line to the Borg queen. That would be... fascinating. :P

  17. Paul Mcgillion... by Akaihiryuu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...is who I was hoping to see at Scotty. AKA Dr. Beckett on Atlantis. The characters (Scotty and Beckett) are supposed to be from the same place in Scotland, while the actors (Doohan and Mcgillion) are both from the Vancouver. Paul's already got the accent down, and I think he even looks like a young Doohan. This sentiment was echoed by Doohan's son Chris (who was going to try for the role himself until he saw Paul audition). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_McGillion

  18. For future refrence by Mana+Mana · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When one of these lists-of-unknowns rolls out invariably again, can one of you brilliant posters roll out a web page with jpgs of these folks and get yourself modded informative! Ahhh, please. It's a drag to copy and paste and search repeat.

  19. Re:different take on Scotty by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Funny

    How strange that it wasn't his own accent. As a real Scot, I can tell you it wasn't anyone's accent.
    --
    Deleted