EDGE Can Out-Perform 3G; Here's Why
goombah99 writes "Blackfriars's communications has an interesting discourse on why the practical difference between 3G and EDGE cellphone data networks is less than it appears to be based on a naive bandwidth metric. Their argument is that the user experience of TCP/HTML is much more impacted by latency, error rates, and processor speed than by bandwidth — and Edge had the edge on all three. Additionally, EDGE may consume considerably less power."
Or some other iPhone lover? ;-)
I like the "High bandwidth radio networks are more error-prone" part. It's so full of evidence, data, and accurate reasoning that you just can't help but agree with it.
Thanks for all those "layman's terms", like UMTS and HDSPA.
Maybe you live somewhere with poor AT&T service?
Yes, we call that "America". : p
This guy's the limit!
You are welcome on my lawn.
Tired, hungry, and thirsty non-native passenger on an airplane: "Could I have a beer?"
Stewardess: "Only if you say the magic word!"
Now also confused passenger: "WTF? Abracadabra?"
> seemed better than on 1xRTT than EVDO
That's because you are possibly the only person in the world left using 1XRTT. You had a lightly loaded service.
Evil people are out to get you.
So you're saying that once I upgrade to a 3G cellphone, my network performance should be high enough to support real time voice communication with other people? I can't wait!
If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?