Slashdot Mirror


What if Google Had to Design For Google?

An anonymous reader writes "Web developers increasingly grow weary of having to put so much effort into designing their sites according to the whims of the Google search engine. When the most important thing is 'getting indexed' it is increasingly difficult for web site designers to offer the simple, uncluttered user experience they'd like to. Reminiscent of the famed what if Microsoft designed the iPod box here is a humorous look at what would happen to that famed, clean, uncluttered look if Google had to design for the Google Search Engine."

10 of 207 comments (clear)

  1. Brilliant, but... by gbulmash · · Score: 3, Informative

    He only did the surface optimization. Missed keywords and description in the headers, didn't bold enough stuff, and didn't use H1 and H2 enough. :-)

    1. Re:Brilliant, but... by gt_mattex · · Score: 3, Informative

      Also forgot a sitemap, alt text image tags and breaking the backend down structurally so all of your *important* text is at the top.

      --
      "No doubt one may quote history to support any cause, as the devil quotes scripture." - Learned Hand
    2. Re:Brilliant, but... by Jellybob · · Score: 3, Informative

      In that case you'll be glad to hear that last I checked they are given almost no weight by search engines - many years of keyword stuffing in meta tags has made their content completely worthless.

  2. NSFW Links in article. by RandoX · · Score: 3, Informative

    FYI.

  3. Re:If nothing else... by mstahl · · Score: 5, Informative

    As a web developer, I can honestly say that my arch nemesis in any workplace is always the search engine optimization "expert". I have had to do so many stupid things because of those idiots it's insanity. I've actually written a couple of Daily WTFs about SEO folk.

    The truth of the matter is that if you bother to play by the rules, Google will index your site just fine and if your site is popular you will end up high in the page rankings. If you want to become more popular through your page rank, you can always buy keywords, too. It's a really simple, non-mysterious process, but people get caught up and obsess about it and start paying consultants to torment their web designers and developers for no obvious gain.

    ( Interestingly enough, the company that had the SEO guy who didn't know his ass from his elbow was pretty much the only business doing what they did, was a Fortune 50 company, and absolutely refused to use metadata in their web site; instead of metadata they opted for super ridiculously long URLs. )

  4. Re:This guy clearly doesn't know HTML by Bogtha · · Score: 1, Informative

    with appropriate alt and title tags

    alt is an attribute, and you certainly don't want title tags anywhere but in your <head> element.

    --
    Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
  5. Re:This guy clearly doesn't know HTML by VGPowerlord · · Score: 3, Informative

    title is also an attribute and that's probably the sense he meant it in, considering that it was paired with alt.

    --
    GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  6. Re:That's because by Mattintosh · · Score: 3, Informative

    Your rude manner aside, you're absolutely right.

    Why should I care about Joe's HVAC Repair in B.F., South Carolina? I don't live in SC, much less that particular part of SC. In fact, I've never been to SC. So why should I (or anyone else not in the area) care about Joe's HVAC Repair? 99.999% of small businesses are 100% irrelevant. Only the 0.001% that are near me and pertain to my search are relevant. Google Local was great for this, and integrating it with Google Maps has made it even better. If you want your business to be found by Google 100% of the time, register it with Google Maps as a local business. It's even free.

  7. And in first place is... by Xebikr · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sigh. Google

  8. Re:WTH? by Stormx2 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Your post would be completely accurate a few years ago. Back then, flash was new and shiny and everyone wanted a piece of the cake. Of course usability suffered, but back then it was the trend. Today's accessibility trend moves away from that, at least most modern developers (not ye olde dot-com-boom devs).

    All you seem to be focusing on is linking, and that's not how indexing gets done; Meta tags, content, image titles, ALT text.
    Uhhhggg... sort of. Linking is actually a very important part (and, unfortunately, one that can be abused). A link from a high-traffic website to yours, with the content "Metallica" or whatever will boost your search ranks a great deal; this is the whole basis of google's algorithms. META tags? Pfft. Barely useful, if at all. Your other points are fair, but miss out on the bigger picture:

    The word webpage hasn't lost all meaning - a webpage should still be viewed as a page - a document. It should have a title, and a structure that best fits its content. That means enclosing the "Google" image in header tags, using lists, and so forth. As soon as you nail down this basic, web devving becomes a bunch easier because every decision is an easy one. HTML was initially designed to be like this, but the browser wars screwed things up. It's only now that people are taking a critical eye.

    In summary: Search engines read webpages the same way you'd read the source code - it identifies headers, lists, links, etc. Having a shit load of embedded table cells is unreadable to humans, let alone bots. Designing with your source structure in mind scores you good search engine ranks. Every other optimization compared to this is nothing. Don't beleive the SEO people.