Slashdot Mirror


BBC Quietly Announces Linux/Mac iPlayer

Keir Thomas writes "When the BBC released its new iPlayer watch-on-demand service, there were many complaints about the fact it was Windows-only — the equivalent of current BBC broadcasts only being watchable on, say, a Sony television. The good news is that the BBC has announced a Flash-based player for Linux and Mac due by the end of the year. (The announcement is buried half way down the page.) The bad news is that it will probably only offer streaming, and not the ability to download programs, like the Windows client has. Quote: 'It comes down to cost per person and reach at the end of the day.'"

3 of 218 comments (clear)

  1. WTF??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    wtf is this all about? They already offer rtsp feeds of various programs, downloadable with mplayer -dumpstream.

  2. flash by apodyopsis · · Score: 5, Informative

    its NOT "iPlayer for linux" - its flash based player for ANY OS that support flash.

    on one hand its not Linux client on the other hand its nice to see cross platform support. I know flash has its detractors but it is ubiquitous and it does work. On the plus side its not Silverlight.

    Congratulations to the BBC/Government for listening and well done on at least allowing us to use their portal to view content.

  3. WTF indeed: read the iPlayer small print! by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    iPlayer offers other programs.

    But at a price. I went to try it out the other day, having inadvertently deleted a program from my PVR before watching it. As always, I scanned the small print before installing new software, and this is what I found:

    Assuming that I understand the agreement correctly and that it is legal, by installing the current version of iPlayer you agree to:

    • join a third-party P2P network and pay for any amount of bandwidth required to use that network
    • accept all liability for any material sent over that network using your computer, though the BBC offer you no guarantee that any of it will be legal
    • allow the BBC to monitor your use of the P2P network, and anything else they put in a policy on a web page somewhere, which they can change without you knowing about it
    • allow the BBC to automatically install updates to their iPlayer software on your computer, without your knowledge or consent, with no restriction on what they may do
    • allow the BBC's software to automatically change your network configuration in ways that are unspecified but that you are explicitly warned may break it
    • not hold the BBC responsible for any damage done to your system etc. etc. etc. including via the above-mentioned updates and network configuration changes
    • allow the BBC to terminate the agreement at any time, but
    • have no right to terminate it yourself.

    In other words, you agree to them doing anything they want on your machine and your network, specifically including using it as a distribution hub for transmitting potentially illegal content to and from unknown users while being monitored, at your expense, without any responsibility on their side and with full liability for any illegal activity resting on you.

    Now, the BBC is usually a pretty decent organisation. They don't get things right all the time, but on the whole, I think they do a good job, and I don't think they're the kind of organisation that would deliberately try to screw people. But tell me, what person in their right mind would agree to the terms for using the current iPlayer software, with today's legal and file-sharing cultures?

    If the new version is streaming, Flash-based, and otherwise no-questions-asked, then as far as I'm concerned, it will be a huge improvement for Windows users as well... not least, because you won't be opening yourself up to a wrecked system, unlimited bandwidth charges, and an expensive lawsuit, just for clicking "OK". I might even be able to use it, which as a licence fee payer would be nice.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.