Spam Hits 95% of All Email
An anonymous reader writes "Commtouch released its Email Threats Trend Report based on the automated analysis of billions of email messages weekly. The report examines the appearance of new kinds of attachment spamsuch as PDF spam and Excel spam together with the decline of image spam, as well as the growing threat of innocent appearing spam containing links to malicious web sites. Image spam declined to a level of less than 5% of all spam, down from 30% in the first quarter of 2007; also, image pump-and-dump spam has all but disappeared, with pornographic images taking its place."
Huh? Where? Man, all I ever get are stupid Viagra spam and "O3M S0FTWARE!" (and variants thereupon).
Humpfh. Everyone gets pr0n spam but me.
Dan Aris
Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
I'll test it out for you. Downloading the file... opening it.... oh crap!
don't open the fi
HAHAHAHA DISREGARD THAT.
I SUCK DICKS.
All I ever get is spam.
Most of the subjects are as follows:(filtered for privacy)
Courses next term
[Course name here] Grades
IMPORTANT: Calculus Final Exam Time
Hello from [Relative name here]
[Subscribe newsletter here]
Funny pictures
Why wont it stop?
That's because they read every mail before it hits your inbox.
See my blog for my free opinions.
I do NOT want to know what words you teach your 3 year old.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
I dunno....I thought "pump-and-dump" was another word for "pornographic images"....
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
and put all of the energy and cost savings into developing encrypted telepathy
It will never work. Considering the trash in my brain, I must conclude that it has already been done, and it has already been compromised.
Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
Are you saying flirting is 95% ineffective? You have got to be kidding.
Well, let's assume I am, shall we?
In that case, explain the existence of the site I faux-quoted and its ilk.
Methinks that if I was indeed kidding, there would not exist the market which this class of business caters to. (Or, for that matter, the porn/prostitution/yadayadayada classes of business.) However, since they do exist, we can deduce that the market that they are addressing does indeed exist, and it would appear to further be a reasonable assumption that if people could undercut 95% inefficiency on a consistent basis, then that market would not exist. But it does. So, I am not kidding. QED.