Slashdot Mirror


High-Res Scan of Mona Lisa Reveals Its History

daevux writes "CNN is reporting that French engineer Pascal Cotte has discovered interesting details of the history of Da Vinci's Mona Lisa from a 240-megapixel scan of the artwork in various frequencies. Cotte surmises that the painted figure's eyebrows and eyelashes probably disappeared due to poor cleaning at some point in the past. He believes he can reconstruct the painting's original skin tones."

1 of 169 comments (clear)

  1. Context is LOST through degradation, not gained! by Scrameustache · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He believes he can reconstruct the painting's original skin tones.
    There is something to be said about a painting's appeal over the ages AS it ages. If it's restored beyond a certain point won't we lose some historical context for the pieces and the methods used?
    I'm not saying I wouldn't love to see a print of what it looked like "originally" but the aging of the painting adds to the significance of the work as a whole doesn't it? If so wouldn't things like thing cheapen the priceless nature of these pieces? No, no, NO! No it doesn't.
    DAMN no!

    Oh my god. Seriously, what you're saying is that a worn VHS is better than a remastered DVD.
    Worse, you're somehow thinking that we'll lose the historical context... as if restoration would eliminate the millions of pages detailing that context or the millions of reproductions of the work in its aged state.

    The degradation, I'll have you know, is what causes the loss of historical context.
    People think that old stone churches were always gray and foreboding buildings, when historically they were colorful, but that context was lost through erosion of the pigments.
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...