Slashdot Mirror


Samsung Unveils 64-Gbit Flash Memory Chip

Lucas123 writes "The chips can be combined to create a 128-GB flash storage device capable of holding up to 80 DVD movies or 32,000 MP3 music files. The chip was created using 30-nanometer processing technology that was developed with Samsung's self-aligned double patterning technology. Manufacturing will start in 2009; but the article quotes a Gartner analyst who reminds us, 'Samsung has had a difficult time adhering to its timelines for mass production due to the complexity of MLC architectures and ever shrinking process geometries.'"

10 of 150 comments (clear)

  1. Great math, author. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "128-GB flash storage device capable of holding up to 80 DVD movies"

    Those must be some pretty small DVDs.

  2. Storage size limit? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "The chips can be combined to create a 128-GB flash storage device capable of holding up to 80 DVD movies or 32,000 MP3 music files.

    Am I missing something about that statement, or is it really as stupid as it sounds?

    With some time, I could create a 128-*Peta*byte storage device with those chips. In the worst case scenario, you build a device out of multiple 128-GB flash devices.

    1. Re:Storage size limit? by obergfellja · · Score: 1, Interesting

      forget that, I want a 128 YottaByte (YB) drive.

  3. This Is Great, But... by MrCrassic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has Samsung improved on the inherently bad Flash write speeds? If not, then I don't really see too much of a point for anything other than desktops (where much more revenue could be made for server or workstation-based uses).

  4. Why? by darthflo · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This flash based player thingie Samsung's building will extremely probably be way more expensive than it'd be using a 1.8" hard drive. OTOH they can shape it more freely (why would they? Hard drives are shaped quite like widescreen displays. Perfect for portable media players) and probably shave off a few millimeters in thickness while providing the same battery runtime.
    While this might turn out to be something awesome, I can't really imagine to be willing to pay double (or more?) just to have a 10-15% slimmer media player. Do you?

  5. Say Goodbye to Microdrives by wolff000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I never liked the micro drives for portable devices. I move around a lot and the micro drives tend to die on me. Where as the flash players I have had last well forever so far. The only one that died was one I dropped from 300 feet up while rock climbing.

    --
    WTF?
    1. Re:Say Goodbye to Microdrives by Firethorn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The only one that died was one I dropped from 300 feet up while rock climbing.

      I'm surprised you found it at all.

      I wonder if the only reason you couldn't access it was because the interface was damaged - IE you fix the USB port and it'd work again.

      Stuff as small as thumb drives tend to have a pretty low terminal velocity - 20 ft and 300 ft end up being pretty much the same.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  6. What about the limited number of rewrites? by ke_da_wei · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Until they make it possible to rewrite as many times as you can on a traditional hard drive, why would you need one so big?

  7. Bad math by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Am I the only person tired of seeing storage listed in terms of "songs"? Come on,

    32,000 MP3 music files Really, that number doesn't mean squat. I have a friend who love punk music, where the songs are on average about 45 seconds long. I have another friend who listens to classical music, where many songs are 5 minutes or more. How could you possibly equate those two?

    Wouldn't it just make a lot more sense to say it could hold X hours of music, instead?
    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  8. What cost ? by Alain+Williams · · Score: 2, Interesting

    and how long does such storage last before bits go bad ?