Slashdot Mirror


Google Begins "Gmail 2.0" Rollout

Stony Stevenson writes "Google on Tuesday confirmed it is giving Gmail a new look. This blog post has screenshots of a new Gmail interface that has been made available to a limited number of users. They are calling it "Gmail 2.0" even if Google isn't. Google confirmed the update is underway at its new San Francisco office, just prior to a briefing on an unrelated upcoming Google announcement. A Google spokesperson said that the new look has been made available to about one percent of all Gmail users and is being rolled out the rest on an ongoing basis."

3 of 250 comments (clear)

  1. 2.0? by Sporkinum · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I guess I didn't realize that gmail was past 1.0 yet. I thought it was still a beta.

    --
    "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    1. Re:2.0? by alexgieg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You prefer that users expect 1.0 to mean 'beta'?
      Thanks to Microsoft, I think most already do. Isn't it common nowadays for users in general, and those in TI in particular, to expect any new OS developed by them to only work correctly after its first service pack? I know I do. 2000 wasn't good. 2000 SP-1 (or more, I don't remember) made it good. XP wasn't good. XP SP-1 was. Vista isn't good. Vista SP-1 probably will be. And so on and so forth.

      Actually, even back in the days Microsoft used numbers to differentiate product versions, it was common sense that "x.0" versions weren't worth it. Those who knew advised users to prefer a previous version with a higher number after the dot, as by then it would be stable and actually working as expected...

      In short: whenever Google decides to remove the "beta" tag from Gmail, I doubt they're going to call it "Gmail 1.0". It wouldn't be good for business.
      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
  2. Re:JavaScript back-end? by BESTouff · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's the frontend's backend. What's hard to understand here ?