Slashdot Mirror


Anti-Terrorism and the Death of the Chemistry Set

An anonymous reader writes "A recent unfortunate casualty of anti-terrorism laws is the home chemistry set. Once deemed the gift that saved Christmas, most Slashdotters probably remember early childhood experimentation with one of the many pre-packaged chemistry sets that were on the market. Unfortunately the FBI has decided that home chemistry sets are a threat to national security and they are rapidly disappearing from the market entirely. Those that remain are shallow boring versions of the old kits."

4 of 860 comments (clear)

  1. Then there's the Internet by ayelvington · · Score: 5, Informative

    Check out http://www.unitednuclear.com/ and build your own. Amazing stuff your mother wouldn't let you have. a

  2. Amateur Rocketry RIP by SirDrinksAlot · · Score: 5, Informative

    Amateur Rocketry is now dead too. I remember going out to pick up a couple engines and found out about the new (impending) restrictions. The government pretty much handed the terrorists their victory and hobby science is one of the victims.

    1. Re:Amateur Rocketry RIP by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 5, Informative

      Amateur rocketry was dying anyway. I remember trying to buy rocket engines when I was a bit younger (~10 years) and you already needed to provide photo ID with your current address on it. I gave up on that day, as did a lot of people because you can't even find rocketry supplies in the local model store anymore.

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
  3. Re:just taking care to take care. by MrKaos · · Score: 5, Informative
    The devil is in the detail, I agree with your sentiment though totally appropriate today.

    * Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

    o This statement was used as a motto on the title page of An Historical Review of the Constitution and Government of Pennsylvania. (1759) which was attributed to Franklin in the edition of 1812, but in a letter of September 27, 1760 to David Hume, he states that he published this book and denies that he wrote it, other than a few remarks that were credited to the Pennsylvania Assembly, in which he served. The phrase itself was first used in a letter from that Assembly dated November 11, 1755 to the Governor of Pennsylvania. An article on the origins of this statement here includes a scan that indicates the original typography of the 1759 document, which uses an archaic form of "s": "Thofe who would give up Essential Liberty to purchafe a little Temporary Safety, deferve neither Liberty nor Safety." Researchers now believe that a fellow diplomat by the name of Richard Jackson is the primary author of the book. With the information thus far available the issue of authorship of the statement is not yet definitely resolved, but the evidence indicates it was very likely Franklin, who in the Poor Richard's Almanack of 1738 is known to have written a similar proverb: "Sell not virtue to purchase wealth, nor Liberty to purchase power."
    But just as relevant and far more recent is something John.F.Kennedy said

    Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
    He knew back then how afraid governments and the power elite are of a population properly educated and motivated, which is why both are being disassembled today.
    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.