Slashdot Mirror


Municipal Wi-Fi - A Promise Unfulfilled?

An anonymous reader writes "Jeff Merron at InformationWeek writes about the problems with municipal Wi-Fi, and how despite the high hopes of cities across the country there hasn't been much success deploying it in reality. He also examines the few successful applications of the technology, and tries to explore why more projects don't make it out of their infancy. 'Thus far, there have been a few true municipal Wi-Fi success stories and several spectacular failures. But more than half of municipal Wi-Fi networks remain only in the planning stages. The broad consensus among analysts and providers is that the only viable business models will be centered around municipal government applications, which appear to be able to provide cities with the ability to provide both better and more cost-efficient services for residents and increase city revenue. This will ensure that providers like EarthLink can recoup their capital costs within a few years.'"

4 of 137 comments (clear)

  1. Re:802.11 Wasn't Designed for Municipal Services by snl2587 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But then the problem arises (and please correct me if I'm wrong) of users not having the correct hardware to connect to the better WiFi standards. My university has done a fairly good job maintaining a 802.11g network that services thousands of us at a time with little trouble, and plenty of people connect with plain-ol' wireless B. I know the university paid a lot for that, though, which is probably more than most municipalities are willing to pay per block.

  2. Re:It's all about the money... by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Towns and cities can do this easily. It's so easy that it's trivial.

    It's so easy that people deployed it themselves in disaster relief scenarios despite opposition from the government, rebellious little municipalities with practically no budget deployed it themselves, hell, soldiers are able to drop a bunch of little scurrying robots and set up a wireless mesh network in a blasted urban war zone.

    The technology renders large amounts of infrastructure obsolete, turns the technology into a piece of infrastructure no different from roads and sewage, and makes some very profitable businesses defunct.

    This is why established businesses oppose it and politicians are paid to prevent it. That's pretty much the sum of it.

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  3. Here's a good reason for them to fail... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Get this:

    Westminster, in London, is installing Wi-Fi-enabled security cameras that can identify illegally parked cars and issue tickets without an on-site witness. In theory, the number of parking tickets should increase dramatically without much additional cost, and city coffers will swell. "Parking enforcement is the killer application that everyone is looking for," a Westminster City Council member said in early September.
    What's next? Automated ticketing for jaywalking? For picking your nose in public?

    As my sainted grandmother would say, "Bad cess to them!"
    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  4. broadband access by xzvf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The question we need to ask is if broadband access is required utility that is needed by everyone for economic development but isn't cost effective for private business. Should it be supplemented like roads, buses, trains and run by the government? Should it be a regulated monopoly like gas, water and electric? Non-profit co-op like some other utilities? Heavily regulated private business like airlines and railroads? Or remain what it is now.. unregulated and private?