Slashdot Mirror


New Parental Controls Limit Xbox Time

An anonymous reader writes "As part of a new marketing blitz to promote the Xbox 360 as a "family friendly" video game console, Microsoft on Wednesday rolled out a new feature called Family Timer, which will show up in the Family Settings Screen. The Timer will let parents limit the number of hours their kids can play the Xbox on a daily or weekly basis. When the time limit is reached, the console will automatically shut off, ostensibly after saving the game."

39 of 327 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Why is the box smarter than me? by Tarison · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Kid, don't get married. I'd rather negotiate playing time with the xbox than my wife ;)

  2. not the root of the problem... by ScaryMonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In my experience, the parents who would be responsible enough to use such a feature don't need it anyways. The problem is the parents who want their kids lifeless in front of the Xbox (or the TV) so they'll be "out of their hair".

    1. Re:not the root of the problem... by 4D6963 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In my experience, the parents who would be responsible enough to use such a feature don't need it anyways.

      I don't completely agree, this feature can help enforce a rule, or give more legitimacy to a decision, for example, instead of trying to estimate how long your offspring has spent on the console and going "Mmmh I think you've played enough of it for today. -But Dad?!?", you can agree with them on a weekly amount and when the time runs out, there's no "but I didn't even play it while you were at work" arguments or anything of the sort, the time you agreed on has unambiguously ran out, and there's nothing to argue about.

      By the way that would also be cool if that thing prevented the Xbox from running from say 10:30pm to 6am.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    2. Re:not the root of the problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My worry is that this robs children of the opportunity to practice some self-discipline. Without the timer, the child thinks, "If I don't discipline myself, Dad will." With the timer, the child doesn't have to think at all. The timer may also create a situation for some children where they make sure to use all their time each day so it isn't 'wasted'. So you have children playing because the box said 'okay' even though the circumstances for that minute/hour/day make it definitely not okay.

      And, you know, sometimes its okay for children to have a 4-5 hour gaming session. Imagine trying to play a new Final Fantasy game if you can only play for 30 minutes. You might not even make it to the first opportunity to save. :) As long as it isn't a habit and responsibilities aren't being ignored, there shouldn't be a problem.

      If there is a problem, I think that's the time it might be appropriate to use the timer. And then, only temporarily. You have to trust your children to make their own decisions again at some point.

      I like the way the Wii does it. It gives you a report on what was played each day and for how long. The only problems with it are that it cannot track GameCube games and, so far as I know, there is no way to prevent your child from gaming for 10 hours, deleting the message, and then playing for another 30 minutes and saying, "Dad, I only played for 30 minutes!" If they fixed those problems, it would be a great way to keep tabs on the game playing.

    3. Re:not the root of the problem... by Eivind · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Only one thing works for 5-week olds: A metric, hell, make that IMPERIAL, shitload of patience. If it's any comfort, I can assure you that 5-week-old *twins* are twice the fun. On the flipside, I can also report that things tend to improve quickly. The twins are 8 months now, and it's a different world. One in which they go sleep at 7pm and sleep calmly until 6am. Heaven !

      Stay in there !

    4. Re:not the root of the problem... by Eivind · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's the problem with -all- measures to help out parents or to improve the life of kids.

      Offer free health-checks, and the ones who -aren't- coming are the ones who'd be most in need of it.

      Offer courses on child-nutrition, and the ones who show up are the ones that'd feed their kids sensibly even without the course.

      Arrange a course in firts-aid, focused on the kinds of accidents children have the most often. And the ones who show up are the ones who already have half a clue.

      Put recommended age on video-games, and the parents who actually take the time to know what their kids are playing and evaluate if it's apropriate for them or not, perhaps with help from the recommended age (but hopefully not by trusting it blindly) are precisely the same that'd probably make a reasonable decision even in the absence of recommended minimum age.

    5. Re:not the root of the problem... by speaker+of+the+truth · · Score: 3, Insightful
      In that case decide on a set time, say 20 hours, and set the timer on 25 (numbers are pulled out of my ass)7. Tell little timmy that there'll be no punishment if he uses all 25 hours, however his father will be severely disappointed in little Timmy. Hopefully over time little Timmy will learn self-discipline, but if he doesn't then the timer is simply limiting how much trouble he's getting into.

      So you have children playing because the box said 'okay' even though the circumstances for that minute/hour/day make it definitely not okay. This is why its better for a week rather then a day. If you know of something that will effect the entire week ahead of time, you can set the timer lower. This is also where self discipline comes into play.
      --
      Using openSUSE instead of Windows since 9th of October, 2007 and liking it.
    6. Re:not the root of the problem... by weicco · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've noticed that when you make kind of a deal with your kid(s) like "you can play X amount of time, OK" they tend to agree better. They know the rule, how long they can play and sometimes they are even capable of planning ahead of like what to do next. If on the other hand you go in the middle of the game and say "okay, time's up, shutdown the console" kids can get very offended because you lay abritrary rules on them.

      This kind of functionality is great I'd say! I might even use it myself on myself :) You make the deal and agree on the play time, you set it to the Family Timer and when the time is up, console asks to save the game and shuts down. And then it's time to do something else.

      But here I see a possible problem. Console enables parents to "offload" their responsibilities. I think it's okay to use the Family Timer but after that you should check your kids to see how they are doing and possibly ask what they are going to do next. To be with them at least for that little time. I can see some lazy-ass parents using this as a way to be rid of their kids, to let machine do their parental job and concentrate on their own selfish needs. Sorry for writing harshly but I can't stand those kind of "parents".

      --
      You don't know what you don't know.
    7. Re:not the root of the problem... by symes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree - even as a (supposedly) mature adult I've found time just slips by at a scary rate when playing (maybe I need one). For my eldest, however, she gets well and truly sucked into the game experience, losing all track of time. For a while we found her still playing beyond midnight on school days (this is on a PSP) and she seemed as surprised as we were. So I don't think it is just about enforcing rules... it is also about keeping those digital sirens in abeyance.

    8. Re:not the root of the problem... by Ephemeriis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In my experience, the parents who would be responsible enough to use such a feature don't need it anyways.
      I don't completely agree, this feature can help enforce a rule, or give more legitimacy to a decision, for example, instead of trying to estimate how long your offspring has spent on the console and going "Mmmh I think you've played enough of it for today. -But Dad?!?", you can agree with them on a weekly amount and when the time runs out, there's no "but I didn't even play it while you were at work" arguments or anything of the sort, the time you agreed on has unambiguously ran out, and there's nothing to argue about.

      Sure, this feature can help you track your kids time on the Xbox...or help enforce your rules for you... It's a handy tool for any parent... But any parent who is going to make use of this feature has already decided that they ought to be limiting their kids playtime. If this feature wasn't available they'd likely be using something else. We used to use an egg timer.
      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    9. Re:not the root of the problem... by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      By the way that would also be cool if that thing prevented the Xbox from running from say 10:30pm to 6am.

      But that's prime gaming time! Personally I hope this encourages kids to dig up their parents NES or Genesis and play all night long.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    10. Re:not the root of the problem... by Evil+Adrian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Parents have the right to cut off x-box. Children generally do not practice self-discipline. Why are people getting annoyed that Microsoft is trying to help parents? Oh because it's Microsoft, that can't possibly do anything right.

      --
      evil adrian
  3. Re:Why is the box smarter than me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    it isn't the machine that sets the limit, it's the parents.

    however, i know for a fact that my parents wouldn't be able to set this up, and I'm sure they're not the only ones.

  4. The machine isn't telling you what to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Your parents are.

  5. Re:Why is the box smarter than me? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, gee, I think the first step towards proving that you can be trusted with the burden of choosing when to stop playing video games would be to not somehow accidentally turn on the parental controls then forget how to turn them off.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  6. If you're an adult, absolutely by patio11 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you're thirteen, and you aren't doing your schoolwork, then bully on Microsoft for giving parents the tools they need to create fine distinctions about your playtime without having to just wholesale ban games. I'd prefer parents actually, you know, supervising their children, but I know in real life that option is not always readily available. (Mom and Dad have to work to send Junior to the college he will be going to if he manages to graduate, etc.)

    1. Re:If you're an adult, absolutely by kenjishikida · · Score: 2, Insightful

      actually, this will just help to educate more and more hackers ;-)

      --
      [] Leonardo Kenji Shikida
  7. Re:Why is the box smarter than me? by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're right, but it's a straw man argument. The issue is that another person - not the machine - can make decisions for a minor in his/her care.

  8. Oh, Thank Heavens! by haakondahl · · Score: 2, Insightful
    For a minute there, I thought I was going to have *raise my own children*.

    Parents should monitor and correct, monitor and correct their children's behavior. Nobody said it was easy. Parents should be aware of what their children are doing online and with games or what-have-you, just the same as when children are expected to let their parents know who they're with, what they're doing, where they are, when they'll be back, why they're going, and how they'll get there.

    The process ofa parent busting a kid in a lie and then doing something about it is good for the kid, good for the parent, and good for the relationship. More to the point, it's damned good for the *adult* that the kid will someday become. Isn't that the whole point?

    Time limited technology is not in and of itself bad. It's neutral--it's technology. But try to deny that the only people for whom this poses an attractive solution are the exact people who need more direct family involvement, not less. This is what conservatives are talking about when we say that all these little influences, each one seemingly innocuous, are corroding the family.

    --
    Don't trust anyone under thirty.
    1. Re:Oh, Thank Heavens! by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      These arguments about "parents having to raise their kids" are getting old. There are gamers that are so obsessed they will get up in the middle of the night to play when they should be sleeping and going to school the next day. Tell me how a parent is supposed to monitor their child 24x7? Parents have to sleep too you know. This tool allows them the ability to make sure junior is not playing games when the parents feel he/she shouldn't be.

      I could give more examples but I need to go to sleep so I can go to work. Hey /. where is a timer so I can't comment after my bed time?

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    2. Re:Oh, Thank Heavens! by sapphire+wyvern · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't understand why there is so much distaste for giving parents tools for *enforcing* the policies they have put in place. Which of the following would you disagree with: 1) Locking gun cabinets. After all, parents can just tell their kids not to play with guns! 2) Keeping household chemicals out of reach of children. After all, parents can just tell their kids not to touch them! 3) Running corporate computers without any kind of limited user environment. Every one can be admin! After all, if you tell your users not to download the special pointers and smiley sets off the Internet, they never would, right? They're trustworthy adults! And the process of an IT admin busting an employee and then doing something about it is good for the employee, the IT admin, and good for the company! Seriously, *what* is wrong with making a parent's decisions enforceable by the software and hardware?

    3. Re:Oh, Thank Heavens! by aarggh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I totally agree that parents should monitor and correct their children's behavior, but having four children of my own, two of them teenagers, it is not that simple. I've found that no matter how much you create and build the relationship, by the time they are in early teens, peer pressure is so strong, and with diminished responsibility, that the teenagers as a result are so aimless, unmotivated, and generally obnoxious and full of their own perception of their "rights" that it is very difficult to counter. I find this with virtually all the parents I talk to, most simply put it down to them being teenagers, and can't wait for them to move out. So I welcome any move from a vendor that allows me to within reason limit the hours spent on a singular device such as the XBOX. I would love something similar for computers. Without trying to start a flamewar, the results I see from most kids becoming increasingly socially backward spending several hours (every day!) chatting on MSN and by chatting I mean nothing more substantial than often repeated "LOL", "wassup?", and "rofl", and umpteen hours playing games does not help at all intellectually, don't get me wrong, I love nothing more than playing a bit of Unreal T or WOW on occasion, but it's a fact, if you don't use the grey cells when younger, they DON'T increase much later. Even though I generally consider Microsoft to be from the Dark Side, they are offering a very useful "checks and balances" option to counter the growing problems in society of raising kids.

    4. Re:Oh, Thank Heavens! by haakondahl · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Not at all. Parents ought to be forever scheming and conniving to instill Discipline in the child. Parents should make sure that their children know first, what is expected, and second, the consequences. This is the fundamental theorem of child-rearing (Why, yes, I *did* just make that up, thank you!) If the child clearly knows these two things, the rest of parenting becomes possible. If not, then the streets are raising the child, or worse, TV and video games are, and the parents are just there to pay rent and cook until they can be replaced.

      Parents should find ways to monitor their children's behavior, obviously without being there 24/7. My father once grounded me from TV for a week when I was eight years old. So I knew what he expected. But I was in agony. I watched some anyway, and when I saw the lights in the driveway, I quickly turned it off. See how smart I am? He came in, took off his coat and hat, asked me if I had watched any TV ("No, Dad."), and then he felt the back of the TV, which was nice and hot. After that, I clearly knew what the consequences were, and suffice it to say that the TV stayed off for three weeks. One week of original punishment, two additional weeks for breaking the terms of my original punishment, and a little something special for lying about it all. Sitting down was also somewhat in short supply for a few hours, but I had just developed another smidgen of responsibility. Thanks, Dad.

      Do you know the difference between Discipline and Punishment? Discipline is completely internal, and keeps you from knowingly doing wrong. When Discipline fails, Punishment can be applied by somebody else (if you are fortunate), and this repairs Discipline. Nobody can be there 24/7, and even if you could, imagine what would happen to that basket-case child upon leaving home. Suddenly the Permanent Monitor isn't there anymore. Kid's head would explode. So I don't think that you actually believe I'm talking about 24/7 monitoring.

      --
      Don't trust anyone under thirty.
    5. Re:Oh, Thank Heavens! by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is this that rare? I'd think that any household that could afford to buy an xbox rather than more pressing needs is probably solvent enough to have a stay-at-home partner.

      How much do you think an XBox costs, exactly? I don't about where you live, but I can afford all sorts of electronics (a Wii, PS2, decent PCs, a fairly large flat-screen TV, etc.), but if my wife or I suddenly stopped working, the loss of 50% of our income would cause the ol' bank account to implode pretty quickly.

    6. Re:Oh, Thank Heavens! by petermgreen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd think that any household that could afford to buy an xbox rather than more pressing needs is probably solvent enough to have a stay-at-home partner.
      A new game console every few years is a drop in the bucket when considering a household budget in the western world.

      Even if the lower earning partner is just a bus driver in the UK losing thier salery would mean over £10K out of your annual household budget. That can easilly be the difference between having lots of disposable income and not even being able to pay the morgage/rent. I imagine the situation is similar in the USA.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  9. hacked in less than a month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'd put money on it.

  10. Worried about the Wii much? by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apparently the ps3 is not the primary driver right now.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  11. Re:How about for PCs? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Vista has a feature like that.

    Being irritating enough to drive you from your computer isn't normally considered a feature.

    Or were you referring to something other than UAC?

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  12. Re:Why is the box smarter than me? by iron-kurton · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What if, say, I have some friends over and they take turns playing games, while I'm finishing up some homework before leaving to go to a party?

    Nobody ever said that the parent can't turn them off. If that is indeed the case, then get your parents to turn off parental controls when you have friends coming over. Problem solved.

    Secondly, I have never heard of a minor studying in another room before going to a party while his friends are playing his Xbox.

    Getting the video game turned off without your consent is not going to make you go to your room and study -- it will make you very, very angry. Being the stubborn bastard that I was (and still am), I would not do my homework out of principle just to spite "the system". I would find a million-and-one other time wasters to avoid having to do homework.

    Also, I used to watch cartoons and play the Super-Nintendo (I know, this dates me) when I got back from school, because my parents weren't there to watch over me. But when my parents got home, they started nagging at me to finish my homework, chores, etc... and I turned out alright.

    While I think it's a relatively good idea, it speaks volumes about parental responsibility. Why parent when you can let a machine do it for you? Maybe a better system would be for the XBox to use its internet connection and SMS the parents periodically with usage statistics (for a monthly or yearly fee, of course), which would then prompt the parents to talk to the kids and make them turn off the game or whatever. Also, if the parent knows that all the homework is done or whatever, why not let the kid play? This system could be less intrusive for the kids, and it would put the control and parenting responsibility back onto the parents' shoulders.

    Finally, is there some sort of hard reset on the XBox (like on routers) that would allow kids to bypass this feature? I don't have an XBox 360 so I'm not sure... anyone?

    --
    Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine -- Robert C. Gallagher
  13. Incentive vs Punish by SoopahMan · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It takes creativity to incentivize good things - like Nintendo does with so many creative games, encouraging families to play together.

    It takes little thought and plenty of self-congratulation and bluster to punish things you dislike - like Microsoft's approach here. What a crappy "feature."

  14. To all the holier than though types... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Umm... I don't see why people are complaining about this feature. Is Microsoft preventing anyone from doing something in this case? No - if you want to use the feature do. If not, don't. I don't understand why others have to start complaining about the parenting habits of others when a company attempts to add a parenting feature to a product - don't you think they got feature requests first from parents before they got the idea to implement it?

    Not to mention, if you're talking about responsible parenting - why even buy the XBOX in the first place?
    There are people who would argue that responsible parenting would mean that you don't get them an XBOX (or TV for that matter). Or for that matter, have the child work part-time on their own so they can buy their own XBOX. The thing is, every parent has their own ideas on parenting, and as far as I know there have been no real studies evaluating the efficacy of various parenting techniques (not to mention that there probably are none - it depends on the child). So stop talking as if your ideas on parenting are the only correct ones.

    I personally don't have kids, but if I did, I'd probably be happy that this feature existed. Additionally, I'd probably want the same option for the PC & TV.

  15. Ostensibly? by Phroggy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Would this word have been added if we were talking about anybody other than Microsoft? Is there any evidence to suggest that this feature won't work as advertised, or are we just making that assumption because Windows sucks?

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  16. People need to be reasonable by Photo_Nut · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Speaking as a father and as someone who spends too much time staring at glowing screens, I can say that this feature is a great idea. Obvioulsy, it doesn't substitute for good parenting and spending time with your child/encouraging them to pursue better activities than video game playing. It is simply a tool.

    Some will see this as a way to punish kids (and some will call it ineffective for various reasons - not all parents can operate a game console). Others will see this as a way for lazy parents to avoid parenting (this won't change that). It is partly each of these things. What it is most of all is a tool. It can be used positively, such as like an allowance - it can be increased for good behavior or decreased as a punishment.

    Parenting isn't easy, and in the modern world you can't always be with your child 100% of the time. This tool helps set some boundaries. Like every tool, there is abuse potential. Like every piece of software, it will have its fair share of bugs to work out.

    Technology is moving very quickly. When I was growing up (I'm nearly 30), computers had Kilobytes of RAM and phones had rotary dials. There were no mobile phones (these too appear to be going away slowly), and no cell phones. My childhood photos are in some shoeboxes on the other side of the country. My son's photos are on our website, from the day he was born. Hundreds of 4MP+ images - several each month as we go to parties or walk in the park, etc. Each picture has embedded date and time and other metadata.

    We are more connected than ever before with cellphones/cameras/the net. This month people can spend $400 on 2 laptops - one for a poor child in another country and one for themselves. As time goes on, the OLPC/"$100 Laptop" will go down in price (to some extent) and the technology curve will advance. Eventually, the future generation of people will all have a minimum amount of digital technology. This will enable expression from any point in the globe to every other point regardless of income. It won't happen overnight.

    The point is that the technology is coming to the masses. People on /. are generally at the cutting edge and we often worry about the worst possible cases and get stuck in hyperbole. We are the priviledged few. Parental controls on a new game console enable most people in my generation to help balance the amount of time our children are spending on one form of entertainment.

    I have spent most of my nearly 30 years of life staring at glowing screens... There's some good, some bad, and some plain old that's just the way it is in that statement.

  17. Re:Short term gain, but long term...? by TeraCo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, but getting pissed off while playing Halo 3 is still better than getting 5 more minutes of .. oh, I dunno whatever game the PS3 has out these days. Kids won't choose a console based on anything but the games.

    --
    Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
  18. Because they don't work by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Simple, these things rarely work, and people rely on them as if they they are foolproof.

    I see some people argue that you could use this to enforce a limited amount of play time with a kid, so that they cannot "cheat". But ask yourselve what this says about your relation with your child. You do not trust your child and broadcast this very clearly.

    Ask yourselve if this does not already show that your parenting skills are lacking and you really need to take far more drastic actions then rely on some tool.

    A well raised child will at times attempt to bend the rules (essential part of growing up) but at the same try not to actually break them because they simply do no want to hurt their parents. Offcourse because they are too young to know better, they will get this wrong. THAT IS GROWING UP. A kid watching a movie that is way too scary for it, learns the hard way. You can install all the counter measures you like, but isn't watching something too scary also a part of childhood? Same as with breaking something and cuts and bruises. Anybody here who did not risk their neck as a child doing silly stuff like making ever higher jumps with their bike?

    Part of growing up is seeing what the laws of society are and this starts with the laws at home. We must at once learn to respect them if we are to function of society, but also learn when and how to break them unless we want to become mindless machines.

    This is offcourse a nightmare as a parent, but any child will attempt to push curfew, it doesn't matter what the curfew is, if you tell your teenage daughter she doesn't have to come home from her friday night date before monday morning 9:00, she will be coming in monday 9:30. Bedtime is important, but so is allowing a child to just push it a little, now and then. It is a give and take and the secret is that there are no books you can follow for this. No simple one liners.

    You ain't got a clue how to parent and your only hope of success is to stop the kid from finding out. It usually works.

    The problems emerge when parents are unable to see themselves as the parents and want to be friends with their kids instead, or simply refuse to take responsibility. YOU raise your kid. Not the state, not the media and not some device. If you cannot do it without help, then hand over custody to those who can.

    Lets face it, if you need the help of a machine to deal with a child, you are a miserable failure. What next, you can only toilet train a puppy with a cattle prod? I deal with "troubled" kids now and then as part of volunteer work. Problems enforcing the rules? Are you kidding me, these kids are drunk for rules. They WANT someone to tell them what they can and cannot do and be clear about it. Simple rule, no smoking in the computer room, full stop end of argument, this is obeyed, but the rule is enforced for everyone, at all times. This is clear, and gets respected. Do not be wishy washy and allow it after class, or allow adults to smoke. The kids even enforce it themselves on new arrivals.

    Frankly the simple truth is that if you need a machine to check up on your kid it is already too late. You are fighting a symtome, not the disease. So even if you succeed and get the kid of the 360, the kid will just disobey in some other way. A friends 360? Gaming on the PC?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  19. Re:Short term gain, but long term...? by Macthorpe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But if they had surveyed the kids, they would find that 99% will get totally pissed off by the new feature. Who cares? Parents have to make these decisions for their children until they have the intelligence and the foresight to decide for themselves.

    A good parent will put the limit on, tell their child why. Then, when the child has proved they have the presence of mind to manage their own time between homework and play, then they can remove the limit.

    The rest of your comment seems to work on the assumption that kids will gravitate to the house of the friend with the least strict parents, and therefore nobody will want to play Xbox any more. The hot news on that is that this happened long before consoles were mainstream, and depends on the parents not the console. A parent can easily manage their child's time on a Playstation 3 by taking the power cord away. All Microsoft have done is provide a tool to make it easier for them.

    Since most profit from XBOXes comes not from the initial device purchase but later on from games, etc., this doesn't seem very wise. This isn't correct either. The well-established norm is that device manufacturers will take a hit on each console sold. They make the difference up in licensing.
    --
    "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
  20. Re:Why is the box smarter than me? by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Worse: it's completely accurate. make your pick: sex or computer games.

  21. No your kids don't turn to animals when they hit by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No your kids don't turn to animals when they hit their teens. YOU screwed up long before.

    Blame everyone else all you want, but that child was handed to you in a pristine state and you raised it. Problem kids ain't just teenagers, you get totally out of control kids of toddler age because the parents can't do it.

    These exact same "parents" would also suck at raising a pet. What next, you are blaiming badly trained dogs on society as well rather then their owner? Puppies hang out at the fire-hydrant and pick up their habits there?

    Things are different then when we grew up? oh yeah, because kids rebelling is something new. Ask your parents about it, or your grand-parents. They can do with a laugh.

    If kids today got a feeling that everything is their god given right it is because YOU failed to raise them.

    The proof? The fast majority of kids who do NOT grow into hell spawn. This is often forgotten, the countless kids who do NOT special attention, who just do what kids have done, grow up, become adults, have kids, live their lives.

    I take your excuse ONLY if no parents are succeeding anymore in raising reasonably well-adjusted kids, but that ain't the case is it. Explain those "super" parents to me. Have they locked their kids away till 18? Why ain't there kids corrupted by these bad people out there.

    Although I do admit that society ain't making it easier, with the increased importance of getting a nice diploma lots of kids are forced into schooling that don't suit them because their parents and society thinks that a physical job is beneath them.

    I see that myself, kids forced into computing classes who should just be put in construction where they would be good and can get rid of their energy and see real direct results for their work. But no, being a bricklayer is beneath most parents ambition for their kids.

    But that is another rant. But stop blaming society for your failure.

    You claim you have a well adjusted to your teenage kids, and call them animals at the same time? Oh yeah, I think I may have spotted your problem.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  22. Re:Why is the box smarter than me? by rk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not necessarily. Marry a gamer girl and choose both. :-)