The Dumber Android Is, the Better, Say Experts

ZDOne writes "ZDNet UK is reporting that it will not be known until the Android software development kit comes out on Monday whether the Gphone will be strictly Java-based, but security experts claim that the less smart a phone is, the less vulnerable it is. Android developers should stick to a semi-smartphone platform because the Java sandbox can protect against the normal kinds of attacks, experts claim. The article also discusses some of the pros and cons of open vs. closed source security. 'The debate about the relative security merits of open-source as opposed to proprietary software development has been a very long-running one. Open-source software development has the advantage of many pairs of eyes scrutinizing the code, meaning irregularities can be spotted and ironed out, while updates to plug vulnerabilities can be written and pushed out very quickly. However, one of the disadvantages of open-source development is that anyone can scrutinize the source code to find vulnerabilities and write exploits. The source code in proprietary software, on the other hand, can't be directly viewed, meaning vulnerabilities need to be found through reverse engineering.'"

Comments

Duh....

[Actually, I do RTFA]

security experts claim that the less smart a phone is, the less vulnerable it is.

Other brilliant revolations offered by the experts:

1. Locking doors and windows helps keep burglers out.
2. Carrying your life savings in cash is a bad move, as muggers exist.
3. Alcohol is inflammable.
4. Shooting yourself is unhealthy...

More parts == more places things can go wrong == more vulnerable.