Slashdot Mirror


Fedora 8 Released

Cat in the Hat writes "Fedora 8 has been officially released. Ars Technica has a run-down of what's new in Fedora 8, including the PulseAudio sound daemon, Nodoka visual style, and a new authentication system. 'Another major change in Fedora 8 is the new PolicyKit authentication system that makes authority escalation more secure. Instead of providing root access to an entire program when it needs higher privileges, PolicyKit makes it possible to isolate individual operations that require higher privileges and put them into system services that can be accessed through D-Bus. Another advantage of PolicyKit is that it will give administrators more control over which users and programs have access to individual operations that use escalated privileges.'"

36 of 194 comments (clear)

  1. Another one? by calebt3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Two distros so released so close to one another? You'd almost think that they were working toge...
    Oh. They are, aren't they? ;)

    1. Re:Another one? by hdparm · · Score: 3, Informative

      RHEL 5.1 (if you mean this as one of two related distros) is a RHEL 5 re-packed to include all bug/security fixes to date, so if you need to do a new install, there's no need to pull hundreds of updates from RHN.

      Fedora 8 isn't related too much to RHEL (RHEL 5 was built on Fedora Core 6). I use only Fedora and Red Hat and I'm probably biased. However, F8 includes some neat stuff that warrants checking up by Linux users in general. It works great, too.

    2. Re:Another one? by petermgreen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Using apt-get dist-upgrade blindly is indeed nuts but if you read the release notes and pay attention to what apt plans to do you are pretty safe and unlike with fedora upgrading with the package manager is the supported and reccomended way to upgrade.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  2. Re:All Hail Choice! by hdparm · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just think of how good it could be if you could actually PAY people to put in the effort to make things right?

    You mean something like MS does?

  3. Re:All Hail Choice! by LingNoi · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just think of how good it could be if you could actually PAY people to put in the effort to make things right?
    mmm? A lot of distros do pay developers. I don't know about Fedora but Ubuntu for example has people on payroll to fix bugs and get things working.
  4. Re:Back on Track by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wait, seriously?!

    RC means Release Candidate. In most sane systems, this means that it's the build they intend to be the final build. It's first build with all the debugging flags turned off, which is what differentiates it from a beta.

    Once a Release Candidate has few enough bugs left open against it, then it becomes the final build. In a sane system, there is no difference between the final release and the release candidate immediately before it.

    Otherwise it's not really a release candidate, it's a beta.

  5. Re:Back on Track by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Funny

    Once a Release Candidate has few enough bugs left open against it, then it becomes the final build.

          In Microsoft language this is called "Service Pack 3".

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  6. Re:So essentially by Firewing1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    They copied a bunch of stuff Windows has had for years (policy) or just got (advanced audio). Do you mean the advanced Windows audio that decreases network performance by up to 90%? Oh wait, that was supposed to be a feature! My bad ;)
  7. Re:All Hail Choice! by rayvd · · Score: 3, Informative

    Red Hat pays many of their developers / admins to work full time or part time on the Fedora project. They have a vested interest after all -- much of Fedora eventually makes its way into RHEL.

  8. Fedora 8 release summary and announcements by spevack · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are a few "official" links that people might find useful:

    Release Summary -- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/8/ReleaseSummary

    Release Notes -- http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f8/en_US/

    Fedora Project Leader's release announcement -- http://lwn.net/Articles/257644/

    And of course the downloads at http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/

  9. Re:So essentially by iccaros · · Score: 2, Informative

    I know, don't feed the .. well you know..

    this is not a copy of any Microsoft or Apple function. This is closer to Trusted Solaris and ppriv command. that allows users to be given access to services and at what level they are usable, IE the OS is at ADMIN LOW because all user will be able to read that security domain but not write to it.. (read down/ write up) and all logs are published to admin high because most users can write to that level but not read it (so you can't find your actions in a log and remove them, but your programs can write to the log)

    in this case though its just a gui interface (not a new function) to the SELinux modules to set privileges at a much greater granularity. example we can give your application root privileges to write to the CDR but only user privileges on every other action, or replace with any OS function including limiting which memory locations it can access, this way the escalation can not be used on any other service/thread or action.

    This is apart of the Mandatory access Controls, that along with Role based authentication (root is not a user but a role) gives Linux the ability to be certified as a PL3 and higher system, While Windows in any current state or Mac OS or that matter, would never be able to achieve this accreditation.

  10. Re:I tried the live cd by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You are blaming Fedora for something that isnt their fault.

    1. DeVD's - RH is US-based. It would be illegal for them to include DeCSS libraries. You can get them from atrpms. Other US-based distributions arent going to have it either.

    2. nvidia - actually nvidia is at fault here, they should either release specs or source for their drivers, so that they can be supported properly by Xorg. (As many other video card chipsets are) And as before, you can still add these yourself, either from atrpms or directly from nvidia.

  11. GNOME, KDE, and other custom spins by spevack · · Score: 3, Informative

    For folks who are downloading, http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora is the best starting point to the GNOME, KDE, and other spins.

  12. Fedora 8 running on USB keys by spevack · · Score: 4, Informative

    Red Hat Magazine posted a HOWTO explaining Fedora 8 booting from a USB key.

    It is one of the more interesting features in Fedora -- users can build their own customized spin of the distro, and then run it on a USB key. Totally custom and portable.

  13. Yet ANOTHER sound server? by Burz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is getting ridiculous.

    And Linux audio STILL has a problem with blocking IO! So now I get to have networked audio in a few PulseAudio-aware apps, while my softphone won't ring and my calendar alarm is mute because some web page in the background uses Flash.

    1. Re:Yet ANOTHER sound server? by Rayban · · Score: 4, Informative

      PulseAudio emulates all the other systems with LD_PRELOAD libs so that they are all PulseAudio-aware. This means that your 1998 softphone that uses exclusive open() on /dev/dsp will function, with the magical policy of PulseAudio.

      --
      æeee!
    2. Re:Yet ANOTHER sound server? by pizzach · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I assume you are talking about some programs using OSS, which actually has little to do with PulseAudio. With Linux boxes you are generally best off searching out at least Alsa when possible. OSS...is just about as bad as esd.

      --
      Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
    3. Re:Yet ANOTHER sound server? by Burz · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, the problem is that ALSA also exhibits audio blocking by default, too. Many applications use ALSA directly, and some of those block audio even when nothing at all is trying to use OSS.

      Adding another userspace soundserver will just compound the confusion that already exists, while leaving the largest architectural flaw in place.

    4. Re:Yet ANOTHER sound server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Polypaudio might be your eventual savior. Polypaudio was made to be a drop in replacement for the very very old enlightenment sound daemon. esd was used so that multiple sound sources could be played at the same time on OSS. You might want to research alsa dmix in your local distributions forums. Good luck.
      Original poster obviously didn't look at all into what PulseAudio actually does, because the one thing PulseAudio does really well compared to everything that came before it is unify all these various sound interfaces under one very modern system.

      Incidentally, PulseAudio is PolypAudio. :) (Renamed, of course.) I've been using it on my Debian box for a while instead of ESD (for which it is a very nice replacement). One of my favorite things is that if I hold down a key to make my terminal beep (like the back arrow), the sound mixing is low latency--it plays immediately, and creates this awful sound. But it's what it should do--which makes it so cool. :)
    5. Re:Yet ANOTHER sound server? by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Thankfully, it does appear that PulseAudio is the One True sound server that we can all finally agree on. It emulates esd, OSS, and ALSA, so legacy apps like Flash and your smartphone work. It supports hotplug of audio devices, including networked ones (using Zeroconf even). It supports synchronized output between multiple devices, even when those devices use different sampling rates or have out-of-sync clocks (it resamples automatically). It has a zero-copy low latency architecture, taking advantage of the latest high resolution timer and real-time scheduling capabilities in new Linux kernels (when available), and it supports latency measurement for sound/video sync even when high latency is unavoidable (such as over a network). It has a modern user interface that provides per-application volume sliders like Windows Vista, and allows on-the-fly routing of audio to devices, including "saving" audio streams to another device if the device they are using is unplugged.

      The guys behind PulseAudio really "get it". They even decided to drop their typically-awful open-source project name "PolypAudio" in favor of the infinitely better "PulseAudio", for wider acceptance. You've got to give them points for that; the GIMP could learn a thing or two from them.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    6. Re:Yet ANOTHER sound server? by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Oh, and I forgot to mention that PulseAudio has aspirations to become "Compiz for audio", providing earcandy effects such as surround-sound positioning for on-screen events (so sounds from a window on the left of the screen come from the left speaker, etc) and muffled sound from background windows (so the Flash ad in Firefox's background tab doesn't blast your eardrums and the new-mail notification doesn't sound over the movie you're watching full-screen).

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    7. Re:Yet ANOTHER sound server? by Spikeles · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Once developers realize that PulsaAudio is on *every* modern system
      Yes, but isn't DSP supposed to be on *every* modern system? Then wasn't ESD.. no.. i'm sure it was ALSA.. no wait, wasn't it aRTS?
      --
      I don't need to test my programs.. I have an error correcting modem.
    8. Re:Yet ANOTHER sound server? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is anyone collecting a list of bad free software project names? My favourite is 'RabbitWare Linux' which was, alas, never released.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  14. Re:Waiting for Fedora 9 by Eric+Smith · · Score: 3, Informative

    Fedora 7 is horribly unstable,
    I've been running Fedora 7 on five machines, including one publicly-visible web and mail server, and have seen no stability issues at all, other than minor problems with one update kernel which were fixed in less than 24 hours. Of course, I'm probably using different parts of F7 than those with which you have had trouble. What areas caused problems for you? And weren't they fixed in F7 updates?
  15. Re:I tried the live cd by Eric+Smith · · Score: 2, Informative

    actually nvidia is at fault here, they should either release specs or source for their drivers, so that they can be supported properly by Xorg
    As ATI has started doing with the R500 and R600 series. So far the technical docs they've released basically only cover the frame buffer, but they've stated that the 3D docs will be forthcoming. (2D acceleration is done using the 3D engine.)

    For now, it looks like the 3D graphics hardware with the best open source support is the Intel GMA-X3000 integrated graphics in the G965 and GM965 chipsets. The performance is lower than the bleeding-edge ATI and Nvidia parts, but it's adequate for most purposes.

  16. Fast torrent this time by schwaang · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For past Fedora releases I've had slow torrent downloads (and I'm not even on Comcast). This time I downloaded at nearly full bore the whole time. I don't know why that is, but thank you seeds.

  17. Mwo??? Available at Facebook? by davidsyes · · Score: 4, Funny

    http://mirror.facebook.com/fedora/linux/releases/

    I wonder how long ballmer will be throwing chairs because one of his favored investments is giving away/make freely available an operating system he'd like to suffocate.

    He is probably going to have a cozy little chat with one young Mr. Mark Zuckerberg. But, he'll start out easy. Won't throw REAL chairs in his office, but maybe lawn or bean-bags first.

    Mark: (seeing chairs break the speed of light for the first time...) DUDE! Aurora Boralis, up close!

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  18. Re:Waiting for Fedora 9 by Pros_n_Cons · · Score: 4, Insightful

    not enough reasons to move
    did you read the notes?
    http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/8/ReleaseSummary#head-4f0c6fbce5ef70b1b3c850fbd9dd725ddfd48a42
    as someone else wrote
    * custom spins
    * fedora 8 on a usb key
    * pulseaudio
    * codecbuddy
    * yum improvements (yes it's fast)
    * packagemanagement improvements (change repos and more)
    * gui for firewall
    * online desktop
    * the whole fedoraproject.org website and associated projects
    * Network Manager suppose to have seamless capabilities
    * New Syslog demon
    * seamless bluetooth integration and laptop improvments
    I can go on. I'm very excited about this release you kidding?

    --

    -- "of course thats just my opinion, I could be wrong." --Dennis Miller
  19. Re:Another one? (yum upgrade...) by DusterBar · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have use the yum upgrade method for quite some time. You may wish to check out the Fedora yum upgrade faq at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/YumUpgradeFaq - there is also a non-official guide to using yum to upgrade a number of RedHat distributions at http://www.brandonhutchinson.com/Upgrading_Red_Hat_Linux_with_yum.html

    You may want to make sure you read some of the gotchas as if you have packages that are not from the Fedora Project and they are not upgraded or compatible with the newer version you are upgrading to you may need to delete them.

    Note also that there are some difficulties in the x84_64 CPU architecture as more things become native 64-bit and thus some conflicts with older releases may happen...

  20. Re:I'm having problems with GNOME. by kripkenstein · · Score: 3, Informative

    I installed it earlier today, but I'm having all sorts of problems with GNOME. Right after I first started using it, a bunch of different programs starting dumping core. I don't think it's my PC, since it was working fine with Ubuntu for the past 8 months. I switched to KDE, and all of the programs there work. None have crashed. So I'm thinking that the version of GNOME bundled with FC8 is just unstable. GNOME is the default on Fedora, so that would be a catastrophe for them. Before we jump to conclusions, we should check one thing: did you verify the checksums on your CD after you burned it? Perhaps there were errors; this can mess up an installation.
  21. Finegrained security by jandersen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...PolicyKit makes it possible to isolate individual operations that require higher privileges...

    I'm not sure I like that one too much. Finegrained security models have always been a bloody nightmare, one way or another, and very often don't get used/are switched off, resulting in the opposite effect of that intended. Look to Vista to see why it sn't a good idea - users feel their are being bugged by constant dialog boxes asking them to confirm that it is OK to do trivial tasks, or asking for administrator passwords etc. People just want to get on with life, so this is a huge irritation - it may be true that all you need is to spend a little time and effort on setting it up, but people in general are not security minded and meticulous. This is, by the way, why Windows became so popular despite the huge problems with security and stability - a PC was almost an appliance that allowed you to use the internet and write documents, you just turned it on and used it.

    Vista isn't the only example of finegrained security, only the latest and perhaps the one that has succeeded in pissing off most people. Oracle has it's own, very finely grained model, which I have never seen used seriously; and then there is RACF on IBM's mainframes, not a joy to work with either, IMO.

    I think the basic UNIX security model is just about as much as most people want to bother with.

    1. Re:Finegrained security by Nibbler999 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The new system is replacing userhelper, so there will be the same number of (or likely fewer) password popup prompts - not more. See the wiki (google cache) for details.

  22. Re:finer grained priv levels by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Which points to the underlying reason why VMS didn't take off like Unix. It had features to burn, and pretty good documentation, but no community such as existed for unix, bsd and linux.

    Even with decus the agenda was mostly controlled by DEC, and directed at selling more stuff. I knew most of the answer you gave to the GP's question, but I never played with that feature, even though I had seen it used.

    If there was most open source stuff available specifically for VMS I would have learned more. Unfortunately the freeware CD which DEC put out mainly contained ported UNIX apps.

  23. Re:Waiting for Fedora 9 by aztracker1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On the same note, I may give it a try... if it detects my fakeraid, that would be nice (openSuSE did, but failed when initializing X for my desktop)... Latest ubuntu installed, but running two vidcards didn't work correctly, I had to remove one, and have both monitors on one card... S-L-O-W and no Compiz/Beryl :( .... if Fedora 8 can handle both video cards, and displays without issue, cool... if it supports the fakeraid, or at least has an easier to configure raid setup than the pain with Ubuntu.. I'll switch my main OS... most of my work is done in VMware anyways... so doesn't matter to me what my main OS is... As long as firefox, thunderbird, pidgin X-Chat run (pretty much everywhere). So long as I can use VMWare, I'm happy.

    --
    Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  24. Re:Waiting for Fedora 9 by RupW · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't think it has GCC 4.2 yet. this shows gcc 4.1. Remember that's Red Hat's GCC 4.1 branch, not stock FSF 4.1, and it has a lot of 4.2 features backported to it, e.g. OpenMP and I think recent Intel + AMD processor tuning too.

    Actually Fedora are hoping to skip 4.2 altogether and use 4.3 for Fedora 9 - see this thread from the GCC mailing list.
  25. Fedora ISOs via FTP by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you want a fast FTP connection w/o having to look for a mirror, try ftp://ftp.ussg.iu.edu/linux/fedora/linux/releases/8/ Torrents are nice and all, but they're not for everyone...