Plagiarizing Wikipedia For Profit
An anonymous reader sends word of a dustup involving the publisher John Wiley and Sons and Wikipedia. Two pages from a Wiley book, Black Gold: The New Frontier in Oil for Investors, consist of a verbatim copy from the English Wikipedia article on the Khobar Towers bombing. This is the publisher that touched off a fair use brouhaha earlier this year when they threatened to sue a blogger who had reproduced a chart and a table (fully attributed) from one of their journals.
So if I steal something but don't sell it it's ok, but if a gang steals the same thing and sells it, it's NOT OK? /me is confused
On Soviet Wikipedia, your textbooks plagiarise articles!
No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
1. Buy a computer
2. Order up cheap ass DSL
3. Plagiarize wikipedia
4. ??????
5. PROFIT!!!
In Soviet Russia, Wikipedia quotes YOU!