Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

NASA Wins Nanotechnology Award

Posted by CowboyNeal on from the good-show dept.

Roland Piquepaille writes "NASA is rarely associated with nanotechnologies. But one of its researchers working at the NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center just received a Nanotech Briefs Nano 50 award for a manufacturing process for high-quality carbon nanotubes (CNTs). Because of its ability to produce bundles of CNTs without using a metal catalyst, this method is simpler, safer, and cheaper than current ones. The CNTs produced by this process are also purer and well suited for medical applications."

2 of 36 comments (clear)

  1. acronym question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    NASA is usually pronounced nassa, not en-ey-ess-ey
    SCSI is usually pronounced scuzzy, not ess-see-ess-ai
    etc.

    So how is CNT pronounced in mixed company?
    I'm actually serious.

  2. Re:How long until someone whines.... by bxwatso · · Score: 5, Interesting
    NASA does waste money. IMO, the manned space program has been a complete waste of money since the last Moon shot. NASA as a whole, however, has some bright spots.

    This reminds me of IBM, which in the 80's was a huge, bloated, money wasting pig. Despite this, they generated more patents and innovations than any other company on earth (ex: they invented the relational database, but Ellison made a fortune on it). Like Xerox, they rarely turned their innovations into valuable products.

    I think that a hugely well funded organization with no purpose (Parc, Watson Labs, NASA) provides niches for innovators to spread their wings. That is, until marketing gets involved.