Slashdot Mirror


Journalists Can't Hide News From the Internet

Hugh Pickens writes "Robert Niles at the Online Journalism Review discusses the issues surrounding the recent tragedy involving a MySpace user. A newspaper reporting on the story didn't name the woman, citing concerns for her teen daughter. Bloggers went nuts, and soon uncovered the woman's personal information. Niles writes: 'The lessons for journalists? First, we can't restrict access to information anymore. The crowd will work together to find whatever we withhold ... Second, I wonder if that the decision to withhold the other mother's name didn't help enflame the audience, by frustrating it and provoking it to do the work of discovering her identity.'"

4 of 377 comments (clear)

  1. Simple problem by stox · · Score: 4, Funny

    Tie a rock to them and toss them in the water. If they float, they're a witch. If they sink, they're not a witch. Repeat as necessary.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  2. Re:The story isn't cut and dried. RTFA! by Score+Whore · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't think you understand how the system really works. There are only two situations where "innocent until proven guilty" applies: 1) if you are illegally downloading copyrighted content(*), 2) you are smoking pot to stick it to the man. Then, even though what you are doing is against the law, you're innocent even though they caught you with a lit bong in one hand and adjusting your stylish pirate eye patch with the other while waiting for the latest Britney Spears album to upload(**). In all other cases the masses, I mean the self righteous, uber-sleuthing, information freedom fighters have a god given natural right to be entertained and proclaim guilt ignoring the processes of the courts.

    * - and then the claim that the bits on the wire spontaneously arranged themselves into a valid TCP/IP bit stream due to a quantum interaction of the large hadron collider and the heliosphereic current sheet, is considered a rock solid defense beyond both reasonable doubt and the preponderance of the evidence.

    ** - yes, Britney Spears, even though everybody on the entire planet realizes it's the same shit they record companies continue to put out and nobody wants to download it let alone buy it. Other than you and your hundred million best friends that is.

  3. Re:Whatever, stalking mods by mdwh2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    You're providing to me an example that you saw on the internet? Reread what I wrote: Has this happened to you or anyone you know?

    What, you'd rather have an anecdote from a random anonymous Internet person, than verifiable published factual evidence?

    Okay, my mate's ex-girlfriend's tennis partner's hairdresser once knew someone this happened to.

    But I'd prefer the evidence.

  4. Re:Does nobody see the delightful irony? by ph4s3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fantastic take on this. I agree whole heartedly. Except that I'd throw her on the mercy of the fiery internet. Don't you hate how /. doesn't have an edit button? :- )

    Regardless, whether she burns in this life or the next I have no doubt that she's a witch.