The Fine Line Between Security and Usability
SkiifGeek writes to ask, "Where should vendors be required to draw the line when supporting deprecated file formats and technology? In a recent case independent security researcher cocoruder found a critical bug with the JET engine, via the .mdb (Access) file format, he reported it to Microsoft, but Microsoft's response came as a surprise to him — it appears that Microsoft is not inclined to fix a critical arbitrary code execution vulnerability with a data technology that is at the heart of a large number of essential business and hobby applications."
Mordac, the preventer of information services, makes a statement on security versus usability:
http://dilbert.com/comics/dilbert/archive/dilbert-20071116.html
Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
Microsoft is a company, there goal is profit. ... not making linux geeks smile
Explain Vista then.
Thats not a bug - its a feature!
Just saying it like it are.
The fact that it's a feature makes it a bug!
> why do people keep using access? It is so dinky as a relational database... I'm not honestly sure what it *is* supposed to be used for.
:)
Microsoft Access is a demo. It's meant to seduce you into thinking that developing your own database applications is easy and fun, and that Access can address your organizational needs adequately. This puts you onto the path that will eventually lead to you buying MS SQL Server.
At least, that's been my experience!
"Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
"Access is the path to the dark side, for Access leads to SQL Server, and SQL Server leads to suffering."
I thought it was just a way of keeping a bunch of copies of the same spreadsheet in one file. Not sure why they call them tables instead of spreadsheets though :)
Security
---------------------
Microsoft
Was that so hard?