Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Anatomy of the VA's IT Meltdown

Posted by Zonk on from the use-your-words dept.

Lucas123 writes "According to a Computerworld story, a relatively simple breakdown in communications led to a day-long systems outage within the VA's medical centers. The ultimate result of the outage: the cancellation of a project to centralize IT systems at more than 150 medical facilities into four regional data processing centers. The shutdown 'left months of work to recover data to update the medical records of thousands of veterans. The procedural failure also exposed a common problem in IT transformation efforts: Fault lines appear when management reporting shifts from local to regional.'"

5 of 137 comments (clear)

  1. In other words.... by Like2Byte · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Business as usual for the VA.

    Once again, the VA shows its true colors and mucks up another project funded by taxpayers for the well-being of our nations Veterans. A more screwed up organization one will not find.

    1. Re:In other words.... by Like2Byte · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The VA is far more than just another hospital. It is supposed to aid US Veterans of all service branchs to see to the needs of them from educational loans, purchasing a home, medical care/assitance and others. See their site: http://va.gov./

      If any one hospital or chain of hospitals peformed as consistantly lousey as the VA has that hospital would have been sued into oblivion decades ago. Hundreds of thousands of vets who've used the VA's services can attest. But, we can't neccessarily sue the VA because they're part of the government. Go to any VA hospital in the US. Odds are that after you pass through the pretty facade they've set up you'll find patient after patient sitting in a wheel chair or bed lined along some wall waiting for some over-worked, over-stressed and under-staffed doctor and not getting the care they deserve.

      The VA needs to take a lesson from the corporate world and change it's face. Rename itself, start fresh. AND START DOING THEIR G-D JOB! That's the best dismal chance they've got to make things right. As it is right now there isn't a Vet in the US or abroad that thinks highly of the VA. And if there is, I'd find 100 that would refute any positive statement made about the VA.

      And, yes - I'm a Vet. My Father is a Vet. My Grandfather is a Vet. My Uncle is a Vet. I don't recall them looking forward to communicating with the VA, either.

      In closing, if the VA *did* do their job the homeless wouldn't consist of 25% US Veterans that couldn't re-adjust to civilian life after witnessing the horrors of war!

      http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/11/08/homeless.veterans/
      http://www.cnn.com/HEALTH/blogs/paging.dr.gupta/2007/05/mia-in-plain-sight.html

  2. my 2 cents. by Brigadier · · Score: 4, Insightful



    unfortunately one of the best ways to learn how well your disaster recovery system works is to have a disaster. The problem with scheduled drills is the scenarios themselves are planned out and typically not run system wide ie test the part of the system then that part of the system etc. on RTFA it seems much of the breakdown occurred because too many people assumed. There was also no centralized decision making identities who had access to all the information. All scenarios when view from there individual perspective seemed to have made the right decision. However sometimes when implementing a global recovery plan one system may have to be sacrificed by another.

  3. Zonk, you retard by sootman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sure I'll get modded to -5, Flamebait, but fucking A, Zonk, Slashdot isn't a newspaper. You don't need to be so economical in your headlines. When I saw the headline, I first thought of VA Linux--you know, the guys who kinda sorta own you. "Medical centers" threw me, so I thought for a second that it might mean the state of Virginia. Then it dawned on me that you probably meant the United States Department of Veterans Affairs. I'm sure I'm not the only one.

    Please, God, isn't there some kind of Editing 101 correspondence-school course we can send all these guys to? I mean, I love Slashdot to death, but please God, can you give the staff just one ounce of basic editorial skills: spelling, grammar, etc? Teach them to write for clarity, not just brevity? Maybe go for broke and touch on dupe-checking, fact-checking, changing links so they point to the original article instead of some guy's AdSense-laden blog page that says nothing more than "here's the story"?

    You're EDITORS, for God's sake (even if in name only), you are indeed allowed to EDIT submissions.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  4. I work at the heart of this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1st off... VISTA is not Windows VISTA. It's the "Veterans Health Information Systems and Technology Architecture". Do a google search on that.

    VISTA runs on HP's VMS, and on top of that it runs Cache from Intersystems. (And yes it costs the tax payers a lot! But a lot less since we've been centralizing it over the last 3 or 4 years.)

    It is a HUGE system.

    The centralization that we're currently undergoing is massive, this problem was (IMHO) scape goated to a poor change control process.

    I know what was change, I know who changed it, and I know when they changed it. However, this 'melt down' has happened three times... (Not to the same drastic outcome.) It comes down to VMS locking out logons because locks aren't being released properly. (Now you could argue that the reason locks got behind was this change... But I don't think that is the real reason because of our previous problems.)

    It's that simple. Ask the VISTA manager over lunch sometime. They weren't afraid of data corruption. They were afraid if they moved the systems, the other system would lock up too with too much user load.

    There goes "VISTA". Everyone logged in is fine. Everyone not on... Isn't getting on.

    Now comes the bad part... No procedures!

    We take 32 medical centers, and throw their IT into a data center. You 'had' clear lines of who owns what, and what happens when they go down. Now you centralize all that... Who raises the flag when something bad happens? Is it the site that has the problem? Is it someone who now controls the system at the data center? Who is responsible for what?

    Oh wait... OI&T only has a dozen staff... And almost NONE of those people are technical. Everyones pay was simply moved from one appropriation to another. But what about the IT systems?!?! We moved those too, but didn't hire any permanent staff to take care of it? We just rubber banded a bunch of people together that work across the whole west coast and hand them a pager and say good luck?

    Suffice it to say, we have some REALLY REALLY hard working people... And some really bad management. (Congress forcing us to do things on a time table is really annoying. Especially since they expect results, but don't expect any documentation... What do you think is going to get skipped?)

    Congress: How is that data center move going!
    Howard: We've moved 28 sites!
    Congress: Good Job!
    Howard: .:Thinks:. Too bad they don't know about everything we've short changed to make such an obscene deadline!

    Then again... Howard doesn't even know everything we skip to get things done.

    Bah