Slashdot Mirror


Feds Have Access To Cellphone Tracking On Request

Mike writes "According to a Washington Post article, federal officials are routinely asking and getting courts to order cellphone companies to furnish real-time tracking data on subscribers. The data is used to pinpoint the whereabouts of 'criminal suspects', according to judges and industry lawyers. In some cases, judges have granted the requests without even requiring the government to demonstrate probable cause that a crime is taking place or that the inquiry will yield evidence of a crime 'Privacy advocates fear such a practice may expose average Americans to a new level of government scrutiny of their daily lives. Such requests run counter to the Justice Department's internal recommendation that federal prosecutors seek warrants based on probable cause to obtain precise location data in private areas. The requests and orders are sealed at the government's request, so it is difficult to know how often the orders are issued or denied.'"

8 of 140 comments (clear)

  1. Another Reason by ewhenn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Another reason I prefer not to own a cell phone. Modern ones all have at least rudimentary location tracking built in. With the way the US Govt. abuses powers it shouldn't have, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that they will try to exploit it so they can track people "in need of public safety"... because we all know how the average American (and yes, I'm an American citizen, so I'm bashing my own country, not yours) will roll over and play dead anytime the Govt. pulls out the safety card. It's pathetic.

    1. Re:Another Reason by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Another reason I prefer not to own a cell phone. Modern ones all have at least rudimentary location tracking built in.
      On my phone (a Motorola Razr V3 serviced by Verizon), tracking can be turned on or off. For me, I leave it on so that when I'm out and about on country roads and Forest Service roads, which I am a lot, they can find me when I call 911.

      But I wonder, can "they" track me even when I turn the "feature" off? Maybe "they" see through the little camera on the phone? Can "they" hear waht I'm saying even when the phone is "closed"?

      Anyway, I'm off to the store to buy more aluminum foil (with cash in coin form, of course)...

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  2. Re:Listen up by wordsnyc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is an element of truth to this. The practical effect of this is to spread fear and apprehension among "innocent nobodies" who happen to be paying attention. The myth of government omniscience (and, by extension, omnipotence) is a powerful tool of preemptive social control.

    It's like torture. Newsflash: the people who torture know it doesn't really "work" on (i.e., produce valuable information from) the victims. It's a form of state terrorism -- it works best on the rest of us.

    --
    Sent from the iPad I found in your car.
  3. About time by VonSkippy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Good. It's about time they weed out the criminally stupid.

    What moron doesn't know they can buy a throw away cell from Walmarts for cash?

    If you're dumb enough to be a crook AND use a traceable (i.e. contracted) cell phone you deserve what you get.

  4. Re:This just in by garbletext · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Tinfoil hats are for conspiracy theorists. When your fears of an abusive government prove to be true, you're a liberal.

  5. what I really wish... by spacefem · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I feel like privacy issues are incredibly important... and that I'm the only one who feels this way. Well, me and my friends who read slashdot. And the four libertarians I know.

    The government only does this stuff because they feel like they can get away with it, that's what kills me.

  6. Re:This just in by anagama · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When your fears of an abusive government prove to be true, you're a liberal.

    Or a conservative constitutional scholar.
    http://www.americanfreedomagenda.org/
    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  7. Judges should demand a modicum of evidence by davidwr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A rubber-stamp judge slows things down for no useful purpose. You might as well just let the FBI write their own warrants.

    A real judge that does his job will slow things down to make sure only people who really should be under surveillance are put under surveillance.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.