Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Presidential Candidates and Online Privacy

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the something-to-think-about dept.

noiseordinance writes "I'd like to know everyone's opinion about which presidential candidate seems most likely to preserve Internet privacy." We haven't officially started election coverage on Slashdot yet, but I figured it wouldn't be a bad idea to start tossing out questions like this as we get closer to the primaries. Try to stay on the subject of on-line privacy- we can run more stories on other topics in the future.

4 of 475 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Ron Paul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Was this just a Ron Paul ad disguised as a story? I don't mind the guy, I voted for him in 88, but I don't like his followers, they seem too like David Duke too.

  2. Certainly none of the DEMs by haplo21112 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The entire party has a policy of wanting to get up in everyones affairs. They also bend over and grab their ankles for any company or organization that comes calling wanting to screw with US citizen's rights. They SUCK the at the RIAA and MPAA tit for campaign contributions, thats a bad sign right here.

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
  3. But Socialists refute private property rights by swb · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    But he's such a raging socialist, he'd invariably make a grab for my private property rights and they are as important as privacy.

  4. You fucktards dont get it by lowell · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Stupid motherfuckers justify controlling other people because some asshole does not have any impulse control.

    I knew a guy that served 30 days in county jail for a possession of marijuana charge back in the 90's, sixteen days into his stay he was gang raped, he also got hep c while there also, That sounds like fucking justice served to some of you nazi fucks.