Slashdot Mirror


U.S. House Says the Internet is Terrorist Threat

GayBliss writes "The U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill (H.R. 1955) last month, by a vote of 404 to 6, that says the Internet is a terrorist tool and that Congress needs to develop and implement methods to combat it."

4 of 457 comments (clear)

  1. Oh C'MON! by rindeee · · Score: 4, Informative

    How did this submission get green lit?!?! This is completely irresponsible. Cripes Taco, go back to posting dupes or something.

  2. Re:I'm know one congressman who probably voted by jcr · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you're talking about Ron Paul, he wasn't present for that vote.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  3. Informative article regarding the bill at Slate by higgins · · Score: 5, Informative

    Slate has a pretty decent write-up about the bill.

  4. Not SUCCESSFULLY Discredited! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Informative
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lancet_surveys_of_mortality_before_and_after_the_2003_invasion_of_Iraq#Criticisms_and_countercriticisms_2

    In a Democracy Now! interview , study co-author Les Roberts defended the methodology by noting that the method is the standard used in poor countries. He also said that the same method was used by the US government following wars in Kosovo and Afghanistan. Roberts also said that the US government's Smart Initiative program is spending millions of dollars per year teaching NGOs and UN workers how to use the same cluster method for estimating mortality rates.[66]

    The article's authors defended their research, claiming that their work was the only active study of the death toll, and that this is more accurate than passively counting reported deaths.[26] They cited a number of factors that could lead to smaller figures from other sources; for example, the Islamic requirement that bodies be buried within 24 hours of death. They claim that the sources of bias in their study push the figure down.

    An Oct. 11, 2006 Washington Post article[4] reports:

    Ronald Waldman, an epidemiologist at Columbia University who worked at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for many years, called the survey method "tried and true," and added that "this is the best estimate of mortality we have."

    ORB survey compared with Lancet studies
    See also: ORB survey of casualties of the Iraq War
    On September 14, 2007, ORB (Opinion Research Business), an independent UK based polling agency, published an estimate of the total casualties of the Iraq war. The figure suggested by ORB, which was based on survey responses from 1,499 adults, stands at 1,220,580 deaths, with a margin of error of 2.5%. This estimate, although conducted independently, and using a different polling methodology, is consistent with the Lancet findings.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."