Slashdot Mirror
Voyager 2 Set to Reach Termination Shock
Invisible Pink Unicorn writes "A computer model simulation developed at UC Riverside has predicted that in late 2007 to early 2008, the interplanetary spacecraft Voyager 2 will cross the termination shock, the spherical shell around the solar system that marks where the solar wind slows down to subsonic speed. At the termination shock, located at 7-8.5 billion miles from the sun, the solar wind is decelerated to less than the speed of sound. The boundary of the termination shock is not fixed, however, but wobbly, fluctuating in both time and distance from the sun, depending on solar activity. Because of this fluctuation, the spacecraft is also predicted to cross the boundary again in middle 2008. The article abstract is available from The Astrophysical Journal."
but can someone describe in layman's term what will that mean for the probe (if anything), will it change course/direction? can this negatively affect the mission/spacecraft itself?
The speed of sound in the interstellar medium is much higher than it is on earth. In case you didn't know, space is not empty. Vacuum is, but space isn't.
Anyone else notice the related stories on the news site?
Nov. 6, 2003: Voyager Spacecraft Approaches Solar System's Final Frontier
Dec. 19, 2000: Most Distant Spacecraft May Reach Shock Zone Soon
May 25, 2005: Voyager Spacecraft Enters Solar System's Final Frontier
Besides the speculation, will we even know when the boundary is crossed? Do they expect data to indicate a transition, or do we even know if the instruments can detect such a thing?
Dan East
Better known as 318230.
Want to see the actual orbital trajectories of the Voyager probes for yourself in 3d type of thing? Because you can, if you use my nBody modeling software.
If you go here:
http://code.google.com/p/nmod/downloads/list
and get the windows installer or linux source for my nbody modeling kit, and then download this:
http://www.politespider.com/nbo/time_series.zip
And unzip it to save you the bother of having to actually generate your own time series (3d time series model of the solar system), which can take a while. You can then watch both Voyager probes follow their orbits (with 24th august 2006 as their starting date), for 20,000 days of travel time.
This isn't a program with a scrummy easy interface I'm afraid, the viewer is console opengl. But there are instructions here:
http://code.google.com/p/nmod/wiki/nbview
And it's not too hard once you get the hang of it.
The orbits do not take termination shock into account, this is pure Newtonian motion. The dataset for the solar system has taken months to put together. It's incomplete, It only has our moon (zoom in for ages with Earth centred and you'll see it), the others have been tricky to get right.
It's not garbage. The density of matter in space is important, and speed of sound is applicable.
Think of it this way, if your sitting in the next cubicle over and I whisper something and you are unable to hear it, does that mean that the speed of sound doesn't exist, or simply that the amplitude of the signal was too small? Similarly, in order to transmit sound in space I'd need some serious lungs. More to the point the speed of sound is a critical parameter when examining how two flows (such as the solar wind and the interstellar medium) interact. Simply put if the speed of sound in the interstellar medium were undefined it would not interact with the solar wind, and there wouldn't be a termination shock at all. Every particle of the solar wind would not interact with any particles of the interstellar medium.
It's been a while since I've done any fluid dynamics, so some of the details may not be precisely right, and I am not knowledgeable enough on rarefied systems to comment on why the speed of sound is so high in the interstellar medium, but suffice to say that many things behave in counter-intuitive ways for rarefied systems.
A termination shock/shockwave/bore/hydraulic jump occurs when the bulk speed of a fluid drops below the wave propagation speed.
Run a tap in to a flat sink (like a kitchen sink) and you see a circular pattern (if the sink is flat) some distance from around where the water hits the sink. The pattern should have shallow fast moving awater close to where the jst hist the sink, and deeper slower water on the other side of the circle.
The "jump" where the water goes from fast to slow is the same kind of object as a termination shock. For extra fun, stick an object in the slow water, and see how waves propagate ahead of it (against the flow). Then see how it doesn't happen in the fast water.
SJW n. One who posts facts.
Europeans in general don't understand this, and it's probably true for most of the rest of the world. From where I live I can make it to Mexico in about 12 hours of solid driving, or to Canada in about 20 hours, but in most places in the US it's a day or more of travel time to either country. In most of Europe you can be to another country in an hour or two. Now, I've lived in both Italy and Germany (for about a total of 5 years of my life), and when I'd be talking to people, they'd talk about wanting to travel to the US and all the places they'd like to see. Want to see LA, San Francisco, New York, New Orleans, Grand Canyon, Yosemite Valley, Yellowstone, etc., and expect they could manage this in about two weeks, which, by comparison, is like wanting to travel from Moscow to London and hit all the major points in between in that kind of time frame.
The reason why many Americans speak only one language or don't spend a lot of time in other countries is based in this. For a majority of Americans there is only one language besides English that is of any utility, and that is Spanish. I was once fluent in both German and Italian, but since I've been back in the US I have yet to run into a situation where I needed to speak either language. It's not like we can day trip to France or that most businesses can deliver finished products to a foreign country with a simple truck ride of 3 or 4 hours.