Slashdot Mirror


Voyager 2 Set to Reach Termination Shock

Invisible Pink Unicorn writes "A computer model simulation developed at UC Riverside has predicted that in late 2007 to early 2008, the interplanetary spacecraft Voyager 2 will cross the termination shock, the spherical shell around the solar system that marks where the solar wind slows down to subsonic speed. At the termination shock, located at 7-8.5 billion miles from the sun, the solar wind is decelerated to less than the speed of sound. The boundary of the termination shock is not fixed, however, but wobbly, fluctuating in both time and distance from the sun, depending on solar activity. Because of this fluctuation, the spacecraft is also predicted to cross the boundary again in middle 2008. The article abstract is available from The Astrophysical Journal."

68 of 308 comments (clear)

  1. speed of sound by AndyST · · Score: 2, Interesting

    speed of sound... wait a minute? In which medium? I don't think there is much atmosphere up there...

    1. Re:speed of sound by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The speed of sound in the interstellar medium is much higher than it is on earth. In case you didn't know, space is not empty. Vacuum is, but space isn't.

  2. Remind me again by tompaulco · · Score: 2

    What exactly is the speed of sound in a vacuum?

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    1. Re:Remind me again by Veinor · · Score: 5, Informative

      Space is not a vacuum. The speed of sound in space is about 100 km/s, according to Wikipedia.

    2. Re:Remind me again by kimvette · · Score: 4, Informative
      That's what I was wondering. How can there be a speed of sound in a "medium" which does not have enough mass to transmit sound waves? I mean, I know there are sparsely-distributed particles even in "empty" interstellar space, but is the medium thick enough that there can even be a "speed of sound" associated with it? Can sound transmission in such a medium ever even be measured? I was curious and googled on desity of matter in space and found this:

      http://library.thinkquest.org/C0126626/fate/fate%20of%20universe.fate%20of%20universe.mass%20density%20of%20the%20universe.htm

      The most obvious technique for discriminating between an open and a closed universe is to measure the average density of matter. The Friedmann equation describes the competition between the attractive gravitational force and the expansion of the universe. The gravitational attraction exerted at the center of an arbitrary sphere cut out of the universe is proportional to the average density of matter. The measured value of the Hubble constant (H) yields the kinetic energy of the expansion of the sphere. If the present density is below the critical value at which the expansion and gravitational attraction balance, gravity cannot halt the expansion, and the universe must be open. The critical density for closure of the universe is



      d critical = 3H2/8G = 5×10-30 gram cm-3



      [sorry the equation got munched! -Kim]

      where G is Newton's constant of gravitation. Another way to express this critical density is in the number density of atoms, which amounts to 3 x 10-6 atoms per cubic centimeter (cm-3), or only 3 atoms per cubic meter.





      3 atoms per cubic meter is actually higher than I expected it would be given the immense (infinite? It certainly can't be definitively measured by any means we have, only theorised and later disproven) size of the Universe. Is 3 atoms per cubic meter enough to even have a "speed of sound" associated with it?
      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    3. Re:Remind me again by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 2, Informative

      In space, it is much higher than the speed of sound on earth. Tens of kilometers per second, a couple orders of magnitude faster than on earth. See, space is not empty.

    4. Re:Remind me again by cnettel · · Score: 4, Informative

      That number of 3 atoms per cubic meter is the average density of the complete universe, inluding stars, planets and black holes, but also including the vast void between galaxies. Any place in the Milky Way, and especially in the relative vicinity of the Sun, is "much" denser.

    5. Re:Remind me again by Nos. · · Score: 5, Funny

      So, in space, they can hear you scream?

    6. Re:Remind me again by Sockatume · · Score: 3, Informative

      Neither the interstellar medium nor the stellar medium is a true vacuum though. The solar wind comes out of the sun faster than the speed of sound in the interstellar medium, in the same way that the expanding sphere of gases from an explosion moves faster than the speed of sound in the air around it. The breakneck expansion of the solar wind and the pressure of the interstellar medium (such as there is) eventually come into equilibrium once you get far enough from the sun. This boundary is your shock front, or in this specific case, the termination shock. What's interesting to me is that changes in the pressure of the solar wind should set up shock waves in the interstellar medium. Please note IANAAstronomer, just an interested postgrad with Google at hand.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    7. Re:Remind me again by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 4, Funny

      So, in space, they can hear you scream? Yes, but they have to take off their helmets to hear you. And then they scream.
      --
      sudo eat my shorts
    8. Re:Remind me again by magarity · · Score: 4, Funny

      See, space is not empty
       
      It's full of stars...

    9. Re:Remind me again by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2, Funny

      My God!

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    10. Re:Remind me again by peragrin · · Score: 2, Informative

      um RM radiation can travel through vacuum, sound can not. Sound is literally the vibrations of the medium. Normally air but other substances as well. Sonar is sound waves traveling through water. why do we use Sonar instead of Radar underwater. because EM radar waves don't travel that well through water, or other dense objects.

      As for speed in space, you can judge it simply but measuring time it takes you to travel between two fixed points, or by taking measurments againist another known objects. Besides Acceleration in space matters more than speed. To get to the moon you don't travel at a fixed speed but you accelerate half way there, and then decelerate the other half. without fricition to slow you down you need some massive forward firing engines.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    11. Re:Remind me again by StarfishOne · · Score: 2, Funny

      yummy! Did someone mention ice cream!?! :p

    12. Re:Remind me again by D4MO · · Score: 2, Funny

      What if a tree falls, in space?

      --

      Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
  3. cool by wwmedia · · Score: 3, Interesting

    but can someone describe in layman's term what will that mean for the probe (if anything), will it change course/direction? can this negatively affect the mission/spacecraft itself?

    1. Re:cool by zippthorne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No. It will have very little effect on the actual spacecraft itself. However it will provide invaluable data (being only the second instrument ever to make in situ measurements there) to confirm and help update our models.

      No matter what happens, it can't negatively affect the mission, because it is the mission. (well part of the mission, anyway) As a useless analogy, if Space Aliens came down and ray-gunned all of SETI's equipment, you wouldn't say that SETI's mission would be negatively impacted, would you?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    2. Re:cool by quanticle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      can this negatively affect the mission/spacecraft itself?

      Technically, the mission was to study the outer planets, so its already been accomplished. NASA keeps listening to Voyager even though its mission is technically complete because its one of a select few probes on course to exit the solar system. In other words, its mission right now is to go to the edge of the solar system and report back what it sees. In this sense, Voyager is close to accomplishing its (2nd) mission.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
  4. Re:And then what? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    this is the kind of thing scientists predict all the time and observe in lab experiments... but this device is actually GOING to the edge of a solar system... it's someplace human made instruments haven't been. Science at it's very purest form, simply going and observing something nobody has actually seen before.

    Why do you go on vacation to foreign places.. aren't postcards and Discovery channel good enough? It's a whole lot different to say "we were there" than guessing what it would be like from a long distance.

  5. Will its speed change? by schwit1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now that the tailwind has slowed down.

    1. Re:Will its speed change? by p!ssa · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thats not true, the real speed boost came from the slingshot around Oprahs ass, followed by a Chuck Norris round house kick.

  6. Voyager 2... by jez9999 · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's a Voyager 2?! Oh God no; come back Enterprise, all is forgiven...

  7. Worst. Write up. Ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The boundary of the termination shock is [...] wobbly, fluctuating in both time and distance from the sun"

    Are you SURE that it fluctuates in time from the sun, or do you actually mean that it fluctuates (only) in distance from the sun? Then there's this beautiful piece of prose:

    "... Voyager 2 will cross the termination shock, the spherical shell around the solar system that marks where the solar wind slows down to subsonic speed. At the termination shock [...] the solar wind is decelerated to less than the speed of sound."

    And finally:

    "Because of this fluctuation, the spacecraft is also predicted to cross the boundary again in middle 2008."

    Ignoring the poor English, care to explain the logic behind this? Surely, going from inside to outside, Voyager 2 will have to cross the boundary an odd number of times? Ladies and gentlemen, I suggest that this is worst article EVAR on slashdot. I rest my case.

    1. Re:Worst. Write up. Ever. by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 5, Informative

      The writeup didn't bother me at all. But then, I *am* a scientist.

      Are you SURE that it fluctuates in time from the sun, or do you actually mean that it fluctuates (only) in distance from the sun?

      The termination shock fluctuates in distance because it's an interaction between the heliosphere of the sun and the interstellar medium. Parts will experience more drag due to magnetic fields, and thus be closer to the sun than other parts of the shock. It fluctuates in time because the sun's output fluctuates in time -- when the solar winds are stronger, the corresponding parts of the termination shock will be further away. So it fluctuates in both time and distance, and depends upon solar activity. Just as the writeup said.

      Ignoring the poor English, care to explain the logic behind this? Surely, going from inside to outside, Voyager 2 will have to cross the boundary an odd number of times?

      Nope. The solar winds overlap each other. A weak wind will create a shock terminator nearer to the sun, while a stronger wind will create one further away. And they hang out there for a long time after they were generated. Apparently the astronomers looked at solar activity and calculated that Voyager 2 will hit two shocks -- one from a weak, but earlier wind and one from a stronger but more recent wind. Makes perfect sense.

      And you have some sort of problem with them describing the terminator shock as the boundary where the solar wind decelerates to the 'speed of sound'? That's accurate. Remember that the solar wind is composed of charged ions, and that we're talking about the speed of sound in a plasma. When the particles go below the speed of sound, then random magnetic fields suddenly become a greater influence than the outward driving force of the sun. There will probably be lots of magnetic turbulence, although nobody really knows what to expect.

      The writeup was technical but accurate as far as I can tell. Sorry it if was too geeky for you.

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    2. Re:Worst. Write up. Ever. by Smauler · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The termination shock fluctuates in distance because it's an interaction between the heliosphere of the sun and the interstellar medium. Parts will experience more drag due to magnetic fields, and thus be closer to the sun than other parts of the shock. It fluctuates in time because the sun's output fluctuates in time -- when the solar winds are stronger, the corresponding parts of the termination shock will be further away. So it fluctuates in both time and distance, and depends upon solar activity. Just as the writeup said.

      Fluctuate, by definition involves time. Saying "The price of oil fluctuates wildly" is ok, because obviously you mean it fluctuates over time. Saying "The time and price of oil fluctuates wildly" does not make sense. That's what the summary basically said - I personally thought there were weird time effects being implied about the termination shock. It's just a crap use of a word in TFS that doesn't make sense.

  8. Re:And then what? by niceone · · Score: 5, Funny

    It means Janeway's going to have to pretend to be thrown all over the place while bits of the ship fall off.

  9. Maybe... by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anyone else notice the related stories on the news site?
    Nov. 6, 2003: Voyager Spacecraft Approaches Solar System's Final Frontier
    Dec. 19, 2000: Most Distant Spacecraft May Reach Shock Zone Soon
    May 25, 2005: Voyager Spacecraft Enters Solar System's Final Frontier

    Besides the speculation, will we even know when the boundary is crossed? Do they expect data to indicate a transition, or do we even know if the instruments can detect such a thing?

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Maybe... by Galaga88 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Much like killing Rasputin, leaving the Solar System is apparently an ongoing process marked by significant milestones.

    2. Re:Maybe... by ghostlibrary · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yep, Voyager has approached the theoretical location of the termination shock often-- and each time, we get to revise our theories and have a better understanding of just how interesting our sun is. The joke among solar physicists is: "Where is the termination shock?" 'Just past Voyager.'

      --
      A.
    3. Re:Maybe... by imnojezus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Those articles all refer to Voyager 1. This one is about Voyager 2

    4. Re:Maybe... by Howitzer86 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It would be pretty neat if Voyager 2 suddenly popped up on the opposite side of the solar system. Then we'd have a new barrier to obsess over.

  10. Re:And then what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Speaking as someone working on the project, posting anonymously for obvious reasons, I can give a little info. When the spacecraft reaches termination shock, it is quite likely that all the transistors will fall off the pcb's that make up the electronics. Chances are this isn't so bad, as their are lots of backup resistors, but if theres a leak in the spacecraft's petrol tank then it might be ignited by some arcing currents, which would probably throw it off course a bit.

  11. No by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, it is not. It is the interstellar medium. Read: termination shock.

    1. Re:No by E++99 · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, it is not. It is the interstellar medium. Read: termination shock.

      No it's not. The Wikipedia article is wrong were it implies that, and right where it says "At the termination shock, a standing shock wave, the solar wind falls below its speed of sound and becomes subsonic." Read Hydrolic Jump and Supercritical flow. The termination shock happens when the solar wind transitions from supercritical to subcritical, which is dependent on its own density, and its own wave speed (speed of sound), not the wave speed of the interstellar medium, which is much further out. While the wave speed of the interstellar medium is given by the article as 100km/s, the density and wave speed of the solar wind can't be expressed as a constant, as it is a function of distance from the sun and heliolatitude.
    2. Re:No by jtcm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While the wave speed of the interstellar medium is given by the article as 100km/s

      I read that in Wikipedia too, but it doesn't seem right. How is it possible that sounds travels so quickly through such a sparse medium? Here on Earth, the speed of in air is about 340 m/s. In water, where the molecules are closer together and can collide in more rapid succession, the speed is about 1500 m/s. In steel it's about 5000 m/s.

      So how is it that compression waves travel almost 100 times faster through the sparse solar wind than they do through dense water?

      --
      @ASP.NET's parent-teacher meeting: "Little Johnny.NET is very bright, but he doesn't play well with others."
  12. Re:And then what? by mustafap · · Score: 3, Funny

    >Why do you go on vacation to foreign places..

    I think you will find he is an american, and therefore that doesn't apply.

    --
    Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
  13. Re:butt wobbly by Facetious · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sir Mix-a-lot? Is that you?

    --
    Let us not become the evil that we deplore.
  14. finally a use for for seti telescopes: by andreyvul · · Score: 2, Funny

    they will be used to get data from voyager 2 on conditions at the edge of the solar system

    however, a wobbly spacetime continuum means that voyager 2 must be running linux
    because the wobbly spacetime is an infinite loop, only linux can escape it in 5 seconds
    but time at the termination shock is slow enough that 5 seconds will be 2 years

    --
    proud caffeine whore
  15. Re:And then what? by FirstTimeCaller · · Score: 2, Informative

    this device is actually GOING to the edge of a solar system... it's someplace human made instruments haven't been. From the Wikipedia article:

    In May 2005, it was announced that Voyager 1 had crossed the termination shock...
    Don't get me wrong, I think the prospect that our reach is expanding past our solar system is indeed exciting news...
    --
    Wanted: witty unique signature. Must be willing to relocate.
  16. Re:And then what? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why do you go on vacation to foreign places...

    OMG, underage Taiwanese hookers...in space?
    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  17. Re:And then what? by DeepBlueDiver · · Score: 5, Informative

    Other than "we sent something outside the solar system again", does this mean anything? Again? The only man made objects travelling beyond Pluto's orbit are Pioneer 10 & 11, and Voyager 1 & 2.
    Four, just four small space probes.

    Sorry dude, all the space ships you see on TV are just FX. We are not (yet) exploring the galaxy.

    Will we get any new data about "termination shock" or whatnot? Yeah! We may confirm that there exists this termination shock we expect to find there, or we may find our theories are wrong and there is not such "thing".
  18. My solar system, let me show it to you... by rucs_hack · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Want to see the actual orbital trajectories of the Voyager probes for yourself in 3d type of thing? Because you can, if you use my nBody modeling software.

    If you go here:

    http://code.google.com/p/nmod/downloads/list

    and get the windows installer or linux source for my nbody modeling kit, and then download this:

    http://www.politespider.com/nbo/time_series.zip

    And unzip it to save you the bother of having to actually generate your own time series (3d time series model of the solar system), which can take a while. You can then watch both Voyager probes follow their orbits (with 24th august 2006 as their starting date), for 20,000 days of travel time.

    This isn't a program with a scrummy easy interface I'm afraid, the viewer is console opengl. But there are instructions here:

    http://code.google.com/p/nmod/wiki/nbview

    And it's not too hard once you get the hang of it.

    The orbits do not take termination shock into account, this is pure Newtonian motion. The dataset for the solar system has taken months to put together. It's incomplete, It only has our moon (zoom in for ages with Earth centred and you'll see it), the others have been tricky to get right.

  19. Re:And then what? by theStorminMormon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Other than "we sent something outside the solar system again", does this mean anything? Will we get any new data about "termination shock" or whatnot? Also, and stop me if I'm wrong, but if the probe is going outwards and the boundary isn't perpetually expanding it can't really cross the boundary twice, can it? It has to be once or thrice.

    Once to get outside the boundary, twice if the boundary expands and catches back up with it, and thrice to once again get outside the boundary.

    Just a thought.
    --
    The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
  20. hrm... by spottedkangaroo · · Score: 2, Funny

    What is the speed of sound in a vacuum? Kinda existential...

    --
    Imagine if you weren't allowed to use roads because a bus company complained about your driving 3 times. --skunkpussy
  21. The edge of... by infodude · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's going to reach the edge of the simulation, where it'll get rendered in lower resolution.

    --
    -- Only information exists, the rest is just smoke and mirrors.
  22. We already are quite accurate by junglee_iitk · · Score: 4, Informative

    What you are refering to is Voyager 1. TFA is about Voyager 2. They are two different vehicles.

    <wikipedia href="Heliosphere">
    Evidence presented at a meeting of the American Geophysical Union in May 2005 by Dr. Ed Stone suggests that the Voyager 1 spacecraft passed termination shock in December 2004, when it was about 94 AU from the sun, by virtue of the change in magnetic readings taken from the craft. In contrast, Voyager 2 began detecting returning particles when it was only 76 AU from the sun, in May 2006. This implies that the heliosphere may be irregularly shaped, bulging outwards in the sun's northern hemisphere and pushed inward in the south.
    </wikipedia>

  23. That's Garbage by Crazy+Taco · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The speed of sound in the interstellar medium is much higher than it is on earth. In case you didn't know, space is not empty. Vacuum is, but space isn't.

    That's garbage. Space is not a total vacuum, it's true. However, the density of particles of matter in space is, for the most part, so low that space can be treated as a vacuum. It's like rounding 0.1xE-25 to just 0.

    And as for the whole thing about sound travelling faster in space, you just made that up. Light (and other electromagnetic phenomena) do travel faster in a vacuum like space (perhaps you've confused the two). Sound, however, is caused waves of physical compression. In other words, one particle bumps into the next, which bumps into the next, and so on. Sound travels faster and farther through more solid materials. It has a certain speed and a certain distance it will travel in air, a faster speed and greater distance in water, and an even faster speed and greater distance through concrete. It has no speed or distance at all in space, because what little matter there is isn't close enough to touch the next peice of matter, and you can't set up the compression wave.

    --
    Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
    1. Re:That's Garbage by kebes · · Score: 5, Informative
      You're making a few mistakes...

      Space is not a total vacuum, it's true. However, the density of particles of matter in space is, for the most part, so low that space can be treated as a vacuum. It's like rounding 0.1xE-25 to just 0. Rounding and approximations cannot be treated as glibly as you are doing. Approximating outer space as a perfect vacuum is a reasonable approximation for many calculations, but not all. For instance when calculating the properties of light traveling through outer space over short distances (e.g. less than a light year) saying it is a "perfect vacuum" is fine. But when doing calculations over long distances (billions of light years), the thin interstellar medium does indeed induce absorption and polarization effects that must be considered.

      So you cannot always assume that "near vacuum" and "perfect vacuum" are the same thing. In the case of solar wind interacting with the interstellar medium, you can't approximate either as having zero density: to do so would ignore some very real physics that occurs when the pressure of the high-velocity solar wind impinges on the nominally static interstellar medium.

      And as for the whole thing about sound travelling faster in space, you just made that up. Every material (even low-density materials like the interstellar medium) have a "speed of sound." The interstellar medium is no different. It has a "speed of sound" on the order of 10 km/s to 100 km/s (by comparison the speed of sound for air on Earth is 0.3 km/s).

      Sound travels faster and farther through more solid materials. You're being imprecise by saying that sound travels faster in more "solid" materials. The equation is:
      v = sqrt( C/d )
      where v is the speed of sound, C is the coefficient of stiffness, and d is the density. So, actually, more dense materials have a lower speed of sound (all other things being equal). The reason that liquids and solids have higher speed of sound is not because they are dense, but rather because they have strong cohesive forces binding the constituent atoms/molecules together (that's why they are condensed into a solid or liquid, after all). These strong forces lead to a very high coefficient of stiffness, compared to a gas (more than enough to offset the higher density).

      For something like the interstellar medium, the stiffness is quite low, but the density is exceedingly low, which produces a correspondingly large speed of sound.

      Sound, however, is caused waves of physical compression. In other words, one particle bumps into the next, which bumps into the next, and so on. You're quite right. However nothing prevents compression waves from traveling in low-density materials. The atoms of the material are free to fly large distances, and they will indeed statistically bump into each other, transfer momentum, and so on. This collective motion will indeed be compression waves. Of course you will not be able to set up very large-amplitude compression waves using, e.g. your vocal cords in such a low-density medium... but the high-speed collision of the solar wind with the interstellar medium will most certainly lead to all kinds of expanding pressure waves, whose behavior is dependent on the local speed of sound.

      These pressure-wave effects are of course difficult to measure in such a low-density medium, but they are certainly real.
    2. Re:That's Garbage by AndersOSU · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's not garbage. The density of matter in space is important, and speed of sound is applicable.

      Think of it this way, if your sitting in the next cubicle over and I whisper something and you are unable to hear it, does that mean that the speed of sound doesn't exist, or simply that the amplitude of the signal was too small? Similarly, in order to transmit sound in space I'd need some serious lungs. More to the point the speed of sound is a critical parameter when examining how two flows (such as the solar wind and the interstellar medium) interact. Simply put if the speed of sound in the interstellar medium were undefined it would not interact with the solar wind, and there wouldn't be a termination shock at all. Every particle of the solar wind would not interact with any particles of the interstellar medium.

      It's been a while since I've done any fluid dynamics, so some of the details may not be precisely right, and I am not knowledgeable enough on rarefied systems to comment on why the speed of sound is so high in the interstellar medium, but suffice to say that many things behave in counter-intuitive ways for rarefied systems.

  24. ...and then... by Sebastopol · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...it will land with a "kerPLUNK!" into a half full goblet of mead at the foot of Zeus.

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:...and then... by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, it's half empty!

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  25. A Few Things by BlackGriffen · · Score: 3, Informative

    As another reply already noted, this is the interstellar medium, which should be a good deal dense than the space between galaxies and galaxy clusters.

    Next, how does sound transmit? Well, sound is a density/pressure wave, right? All I need is for the free particles to be interacting somehow to set one up. Turns out, the interstellar medium isn't a gas like you're used to thinking of, it's a plasma. The important point here being that because the electrons are not bound to the atoms, the effective "size" of the atoms goes up (that is, the disntance over which they interact with neighboring atoms). Thus you should be able to get sound waves more easily than you would suspect from a regular gas that is that sparse.

  26. Re:100km/s? Bloody unlikely by imsabbel · · Score: 3, Informative

    Plasma, meet speed of sound.
    "Why are you so high, for my low density?"
    "Because you are plasma, and no stupid ideal gas, slowpoke!"

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  27. Unless I'm mistaken by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Pioneers were dead when the left the solar system. The Voyagers are still sending data.

  28. Re:Why don't we do this more often? by Tango42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because few governments expect to still be in power in 30 year's time, so what's the point? Cynical? Me? Never... ;)

    It's worth pointing out that the primary missions of the Voyager probes were to explore the outer planets, which they did with great success many years ago (and we have sent more probes since). The fact that they are still active now and sending back useful information about the termination shock is just a bonus, so what you say about only sending two being a risk isn't really valid.

  29. Make your own termination shock. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A termination shock/shockwave/bore/hydraulic jump occurs when the bulk speed of a fluid drops below the wave propagation speed.

    Run a tap in to a flat sink (like a kitchen sink) and you see a circular pattern (if the sink is flat) some distance from around where the water hits the sink. The pattern should have shallow fast moving awater close to where the jst hist the sink, and deeper slower water on the other side of the circle.

    The "jump" where the water goes from fast to slow is the same kind of object as a termination shock. For extra fun, stick an object in the slow water, and see how waves propagate ahead of it (against the flow). Then see how it doesn't happen in the fast water.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  30. Re:Why don't we do this more often? by Diakoneo · · Score: 3, Informative

    We can't do this _every_ year because the reason the Voyagers made it out so far was gravity assist.
    But I agree, I'd like to see NASA funding going to a lot of smaller projects like this than one behemoth one.

    --
    "Well..here I am..." - Jubal Early
  31. Cool by twmcneil · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't wait to see the pictures of the Restaurant.

    --
    "The ferrets, they're every where I tell you!"
  32. Re:And then what? by pnewhook · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Also, and stop me if I'm wrong, but if the probe is going outwards and the boundary isn't perpetually expanding it can't really cross the boundary twice, can it? It has to be once or thrice.

    Actually no. The spacecraft would have crossed the boundary twice and the boundary would have overtaken the spacecraft once.

    You can say you crossed the threshold of a door by walking through it. But if you stand still and the door suddenly flies past you, I don't think you can claim that you crossed the threshold.

    --
    Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
  33. Re:Price Fixing by Bob-taro · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have heard that some stores use the cents part of the price to indicate a category of pricing. For example, $x.99 is regularly priced, $x.98 is sale priced, $x.97 is clearance priced, etc.

    Today only! Closeout prices! Everything in the store is 3 cents off! That's right, 3 cents off! That's lower than sale price! Even lower than clearance sale price! Don't miss this amazing opportunity!

    --
    Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
  34. Re:Some but not much by grep_rocks · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or we could work on nuclear propulsion and get there in no time... you can build an 8M ton ship that can go 10% the speed of light using 1960s technology... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Orion_(nuclear_propulsion) of course it drops H-bombs out the back onto a metal plate so it isn't super eco-friendly...

  35. The interstellar medium has huge effects on light by glaswegian · · Score: 4, Informative

    But when doing calculations over long distances (billions of light years), the thin interstellar medium does indeed induce absorption and polarization effects that must be considered. The effects happen on much smaller scales than this, and will depend on the density of matter that the light crosses. You can simply look at an optical image towards the centre of our Galaxy. It is only ~25000 light years away and has a huge concentration of stars. It should be a blazing ball of light but it is obscured by a dark "shadow".

    This is the effect of minute "dust" particles permeating space and absorbing/deflecting light. The effect is less for longer wavelengths which is why we can get a better view of the Galactic centre in the infrared.

  36. Re:And then what? by dan828 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Europeans in general don't understand this, and it's probably true for most of the rest of the world. From where I live I can make it to Mexico in about 12 hours of solid driving, or to Canada in about 20 hours, but in most places in the US it's a day or more of travel time to either country. In most of Europe you can be to another country in an hour or two. Now, I've lived in both Italy and Germany (for about a total of 5 years of my life), and when I'd be talking to people, they'd talk about wanting to travel to the US and all the places they'd like to see. Want to see LA, San Francisco, New York, New Orleans, Grand Canyon, Yosemite Valley, Yellowstone, etc., and expect they could manage this in about two weeks, which, by comparison, is like wanting to travel from Moscow to London and hit all the major points in between in that kind of time frame.

    The reason why many Americans speak only one language or don't spend a lot of time in other countries is based in this. For a majority of Americans there is only one language besides English that is of any utility, and that is Spanish. I was once fluent in both German and Italian, but since I've been back in the US I have yet to run into a situation where I needed to speak either language. It's not like we can day trip to France or that most businesses can deliver finished products to a foreign country with a simple truck ride of 3 or 4 hours.

  37. Re:And then what? by j-pimp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So stop pretending that Americans don't check out foreign places because they have everything they need in their own country. Americans are so USA-centric because they are largely ignorant of foreign cultures/countries and they tend to be pretty cheap.

    If your talking high culture then yes Manhattan is pretty much our epicenter. I have only been to DC on guided tours, so the only culture I experienced there was tours of the Smithsonian, government building and monuments.

    Now in terms of folk culture, you are wrong. First of all the world epicenter of low culture is Queens NYC, possibly the most ethnically diverse area of its size on the planet. Secondly, if you can't tell the difference between different parts of the country then you need to open your eyes. Compare New York and California for example. Even though a small but sizable portion of the population regularly travels between the LA and NY metro areas, the cities have completely different feels. Try finding good grits in the North East, or decent Italian food in the South, minus a few places with significant migration from New York.

    I just love when Americans (who know I am foreigner from the other side of the ocean) ask me whether I went back home for Thanksgiving, and I study in one of the top 25 universities in the USA. I can never understand how people can ace Calc IV without studying and yet they are too ignorant to know that Georgia isn't simply a state. It's nation with a 3000 year old history, no less.

    I have two counter points to that.

    First of all good at math does not mean good at history. If they are that good at math, and don't care for geography, they can survive just fine in college. I know a brilliant Mathematicians and programmer that probably didn't know where Prague was until he had to fly there to enter his physics engine into a competition. I would think that brilliant mathematicians in Georgia that do not study overseas have a narrower world view than you do. Also, I'm also sure Americans that study overseas have a firmer understanding of the world then their classmates.

    As far as people asking you how your thanksgiving was, we Americans are known for engaging in mindless smalltalk. Most people probably didn't think out their statement. They also probably didn't care about your holiday. Finally how many of these people know you are in this country alone and not with your family.

    --
    --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
  38. Re:Congrats to Humanity by KiloByte · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not ever, actually. It would need to go pretty fast -- the escape velocity needed to escape our galaxy from the vicinity of the Solar system is around 1000km/s.

    We have ever launched 5 spacecraft going fast enough to escape out of the Solar system, at mere 11-ish km/s at the Earth orbit ("-ish" because we cheat a bit using gravitational slingshots).

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  39. Re:And then what? by Propaganda13 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Obviously, you've visited a few cities as a tourist. You've fallen for tourist view of any city, visited landmarks, etc. If you've lived all over the US, you would have realized that large cities have ethnic neighborhoods where English is not always the first language. Polish, Spanish, Italian, Hmong, Irish, etc. Hell, English isn't always understandable from various parts of the country.

    I asked my co-worker what she was doing for Thanksgiving. She was going back home... to India. I may even ask her what's she's doing for Christmas even though she's not Christian.

    While there are dumb, socially-inept, or culturally unaware Americans, are you sure they know you're from the other side of the ocean? A Georgian (country) accent isn't enough to say you're from another country.

  40. Re:And then what? by MvD_Moscow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    LOL, I love the comment about India being a shithole. Just shows how much you know foreign countries.

    I never said that Europe is the pinnacle of human evolution. They have their own set of problems, they let racism take priority over economic interests unlike Americans who are racist but will let you work in the USA if it economically benefits. Europe has fuckloads of bad things about it. But that's not my point...

    My point is that culture within the USA tends to be very similar. It's pretty much the same shit everywhere. Strip malls, ghettos and downtowns. There are very few landmarks worth visiting if you are not American. Compare the landmarks in say Washington with any major European city.

    The reason why I study in the USA is because I am not a dumb asshole like you. America has a better University system and it has more economic opportunity if you are a non-citizen (compared to Europe). Unlike you, I am not some mad fanatic who gets insulted by every random thing you say about their country. Get over it man, America has no culture. All your public holidays are just consumerist rage fests, you have no real history, you have very few cool landmarks (with the exception of NY). But that doesn't mean USA is a pile of shit, what it lacks in culture it makes up for in economic competitiveness.

    It's funny that you talk about genocide considering that USA was founded on the mass eradication of the Native American population.

    Chill out man, nation states are a load of bullshit anyways.