Slashdot Mirror


AOL, Netflix and the End of Open Research

An anonymous reader writes "In 2006, heads rolled at AOL after the company released anonymized logs of user searches. With last week's announcement that researchers had been able to learn the identities of users in the scrubbed Netflix dataset, could the days of companies sharing data with academic researchers be numbered? Shortly after the AOL incident, Google's Eric Schmidt called the data release 'a terrible thing,' and assured the public that 'this kind of thing could not happen at Google.' Will any high tech company ever take this kind of chance again? If not, how will this impact research and and the development of future technologies that could have come from the study of real data?"

4 of 85 comments (clear)

  1. Correlations by Lachryma · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The identities were learned because the users shared their movie preference information with IMDB.

    I don't see this as a problem, yet.

  2. The Impact by flaming+error · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > how will this impact research and and the development
    > of future technologies that could have come from the
    > study of real data?

    It's definitely a hindrance. Kind of like not letting cops search houses without permission.

  3. Re:Opt-in by kcwhitta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem with opt-in statistical gathering is that they can skew a sample, subtly biasing it. This would invalidate a lot of scientific research.

  4. research for the sake of? by BlowChunx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I love this quote from TFA:
    "Companies do not make money by giving researchers access to data. "

    Wrong! Netflix released data to get a better recommendation system. The better they can pick movies for you, the more you will like their service. The $1million prize is peanuts compared to the increase in revenue a better system can bring.

    I wonder if anyone has estimated the value of the man hours invested in this contest?