Slashdot Mirror


Chimps Outscore College Students on Memory Test

AP's Malcolm Ritter reports that young chimpanzees were better at remembering a series of numbers flashed on a screen, than the Japanese college students used as a control group. Scientists plan to repeat the experiment using 5th graders against the great apes.

3 of 271 comments (clear)

  1. Actually, it kind of makes sense by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That a chimp would do it faster. A human would instinctively put a "name" on each number seen, thus slowing down the "processing".

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  2. Brain speed != intelligence by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The speed at which you see and respond is not at all linked to intelligence. It is far more linked to your need for this speed (ie. due to evolution), priimarily driven by your need to control motion and for feeding.

    For example animals which feed by catching fast moving bugs in their mouth (eg. birds and fish) need to respond very quickly otherwise their food is long gone. Animals that eat berries and kill their food or have paws and hands don't have to be that fast. Animals that live in trees etc and need to judge distance better (monkeys etc) need faster responses than ground based humans etc.

    I forget what this effect is called, but I understand that trout have a speed 20x that of humans. That's to be expected when a trout has to feed by eating little bugs coming past it in fast moving water. The trout has to be able to respond quickly to make an energy efficient movement and get the bug before it has gone. The energy in a small gnat is not enough to waste on charging around the stream.

    As a result of this, I'm not at all suprised that a chimp beats a human in a low level counting game.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  3. Re:Misleading... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That certainly sounds like "better" short-term memory to me... increased speed without loss of accuracy.
    Whether or not that is better depends on oter parameters, as well. SRAM is much faster than DRAM, yet modern high performance desktops rely on DRAM - because SRAM has a lower density than DRAM. Likewise, the chimpanzee brain could allocate more resources to short-term memory, on the expense of other functions our brains tend to emphasize. The result would be faster short-term memory that still wouldn't neccessarily be desirable for us.
    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)