Slashdot Mirror


PDF Is Now ISO 32000

It is official. As PDF Architect Jim King blogged today, Adobe has received word that the ballot for approval of PDF 1.7 to become the ISO 32000 Standard (DIS) has passed by a vote of 13 positive to 1 negative. A two-thirds majority is required to pass so it was a large margin of victory (93%). The vote breaks down as follows: Countries voting positive with no comments (9): Australia, Bulgaria, China, Japan, Poland, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Ukraine. Countries voting positive with comments (4): UK (13 comments), USA (125), Germany (11), Switzerland (19). Countries voting negative with comments (1): France (37 comments). Countries abstaining (1): Russia.

5 of 410 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Adobe by PenGun · · Score: 5, Informative

    Xpdf opens a 114M file in under 2 secs and a 25M one is pretty well instantaneous. Some kind of windose problem no doubt.

  2. Re:ISO? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Informative

    While I realize this is supposed to be an amusing turn of phrase, there are actually quite a few tools out there. A few that I like are:

    PDFBox - OSS Library for modifying PDFs on the fly.
    FOP - Use XSL-FO to design printable page layouts in XML, then use FOP to transform them to PDF documents.
    Foxit Tools - Alternative to the overpriced Adobe products.
    OpenOffice - The built-in support for PDFs is absolutely wonderful. I rarely give out DOC files anymore.
    FPDF - PHP PDF generation tools.
    iText - A great library for your own custom PDF generation.

    Those are just a few. The PDF format itself is actually not too bad. (When Adobe isn't breaking it with needless revisions, that is.) It's biggest strength is that the psuedo-text nature of the format allows one to diagnose the internals of a file pretty easily. Its greatest weakness is that things like text fields are needlessly convoluted. At the end of the day, though, it's a pretty good format.

  3. Re:Adobe by forkazoo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Great, now just make a reader that doesn't slow my system down to a crawl while opening a 100K document.


    The whole point of standardization is that it doesn't matter what Adobe does. Anybody can impliment the standard without too much trouble. Though, in practice, it was a DeFacto standard anyway, and there is already a ton of software that supports PDF. I haven't used Adobe's PDF reader in years.

    xpdf, kpdf, Preview.app, Foxit Reader, etc. all work and between them probably support damn near any platform you would want to use. I use Foxit on my Windows machines, and I find it to be very convenient software which is fast, light, and mostly stays out of my way.
  4. Re:That is pretty sensitive.... by RedBear · · Score: 5, Informative

    Film with a high ISO rating is very "fast" which means that it can shoot in very dimly lit situations. 32000 ISO, however, is fucking insane. You could pick up big-bang background noise with that shit!

    It's not insane, it's just one "f-stop" more sensitive to light than ISO 16000, which is one f-stop more sensitive than ISO 8000. We've already had ISO 6400 film for decades, and right now on the market there are a couple of cameras (like the latest flagship digital SLR from Nikon) with ISO 26500. Yes, that's twenty-six thousand, five hundred. Don't ask me how or why they did it, but they did. Nothing particularly crazy about it, in fact it's a great thing for those who need to use high shutter speeds in low light and/or can't afford ultra-expensive large aperture lenses.

    Within ten years we no doubt will be seeing some digital cameras with ISO 32000 or higher sensitivities. Now if they'd just do something about the extremely limited dynamic range...

  5. Re:PDF works by tonyr60 · · Score: 5, Informative

    PDF was never intended to be edited, once published. The objective of the format it that it can be rendered as the author intended, not edited.