Did SCO Get Linux-mob Justice?
An anonymous reader writes "According to Fortune's legal blogger Roger Parloff, "once in awhile a judicial ruling comes down that's so wrong at such a basic level that you're just left scratching your head". He claims that Judge Kimball's "102-page ruling (about SCO) was greeted with widespread rejoicing and I-told-you-so's", but "the problem is not that Judge Kimball's view of the facts is wrong". Was the ruling unfair?"
Was the ruling unfair?
Hmmm, I can't think of a more appropriate place to ask that question...
This guy's the limit!
SCO (and Darl in particular) didn't get enough mob justice. I'm thinking keelhauling is about right.
No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
Since Darl figured out how to create a slashdot account.
"National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
who do you beat it?
:P
I am not understand you're question!
and we knew who we weeeeere then,
trolls were trolls, and girls were men,
you know we could use a man like CleverNickName again
Everyone would moderate,
then take a break to masturbate
Gee, our old Slashcode ran great
THOSE...WERE...THE...DAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYSSS
Just then the floating disembodied head of Colonel Sanders started yelling Everything You Know Is Wrong!-Weird Al
it's the BSD guys who have the pitchforks
If all businesses followed the "No Asshole Rule" there would be nobody left to run Comcast, AT&T, Vivendi, News Corporation, Universal, BMG, Time-Warner, ExxonMobil, Halliburton, Microsoft, Paramount, Exelon... I could go on but I'm sure you get the idea.
You seem to imply that would be a bad thing.
For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.