Slashdot Mirror


House Bill Won't Criminalize Free Wi-Fi Operators

Velcroman98 sends word of a bill that passed the US House of Representatives by a lopsided vote of 409 to 2. It would require everyone who runs an open Wi-Fi connection to report illegal images, including "obscene" cartoons and drawings, or be fined up to $300,000. The Securing Adolescents From Exploitation-Online (SAFE) Act was rushed through the House without any hearings or committee votes, and the version that passed on a voice vote reportedly differs substantially from the last publicly available version. CNET reports that sentiment in favor of such a bill is strong in the Senate as well. Update: 12/07 06:22 GMT by Z : As clarified in an Ars writeup, this summary is a bit off-base. The bill doesn't require WiFi owners to police anything, merely 'stiffening the penalties' for those who make no effort to report obvious child pornography.

1 of 540 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Sad, but predictable by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Basically, if you are operating a Wi-Fi service, and find out that one of your users is downloading or uploading child porn, you are responsible for reporting it. What part of that is controversial?
    The controversial part is how does joe coffee shop owner monitor every packet that may or nay not leave his premises, what if someone uses a VPN and the free wifi to download child porn? It becomes a tangled mess very quickly.

    --
    I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.