Slashdot Mirror


New Wave Power Research Rising Off Oregon Coast

necro81 writes "A prototype buoy has been launched off the Oregon coast to try generating electrical power from the ever-present waves. The OSU device works like a giant shake-up flashlight. It is one of several competing designs to take advantage of a potential clean energy goldmine. It will be years before substantial power is contributed to the grid, but several companies have received permits to develop test platforms. The New York Times has an article that surveys the current outlook for wave energy, which it compares to wind energy's prospects back in the 1980s. Concerns about impacts to wildlife and fishing remain to be answered."

21 of 158 comments (clear)

  1. "Current outlook" by dvonhand · · Score: 5, Funny

    Experts predict that current will flow from the anode to the cathode terminal in the near future.

    1. Re:"Current outlook" by chuckymonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      Great, we now have the nerd equivalent of the Weekly World News Zodiac Astrologer (WWWNZA?). Taurus: Your code will compile with unexpected results. Also a diet of cheetos and soda pop will lead to weight gain. Scorpio: Experts predict that current will flow from the anode to the cathode terminal in the near future. Also romance prospects with your new Macbook Pro look promising. So on and so forth.

      --
      "Some books contain the machinery required to create and sustain universes."-Tycho
  2. Sounds good by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Sounds like most of the resistance is from the fishing industry, but since it's not a very well proven technology, I'd say they have a fair point. So the current plan - to do some small proof-of-concept wave farms first - seems just the right thing to do. From the end of the article:

    Philip D. Moeller, a member of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and a supporter of wave and tidal energy projects, said the government was "not allowing these to go into sensitive areas." Mr. Moeller added, "We haven't defined sensitive area, but the point is we'll be cognizant of that."

    He said the commission was encouraging wave energy companies to seek a new five-year "pilot license" the commission has created specifically for wave and tidal energy projects. The license, which could be gained in six months, would let companies set up a short-term wave farm to test technology and demonstrate success to wary investors. If environmental damage became evident, he said, the equipment could be removed from the ocean fairly quickly, something that is far more complicated with dams.

    1. Re:Sounds good by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's OK, in 20 years when we really need the power, there won't be any more fish in the sea, so there will be no fishing industry to complain.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  3. New Wave Power? by __aagctu1952 · · Score: 3, Funny

    So... I'm assuming harnessing New Wave Power off the coast of Oregon will be about dumping Adam & the Ants in the Pacific and attaching a generator and power cables to them? Hey, I'm for it! In fact... screw the turbine. And the cables...

  4. No energy is free by Eddi3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's no such thing as free energy. What I wonder, is what this is affecting in the long run, and by how much.

    1. Re:No energy is free by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The actual harnessing of the waves probably won't affect much. It would be much worse to create a man-made harbor instead -- all you're doing is breaking down the waves before they break on the beach. The only negative affects would come with giant metal buckets floating in the water with long rods going down to the bottom... some fish might bump their heads...

    2. Re:No energy is free by Tumbleweed · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is a tidal system being changed, so we have to look at the other things effected by the tidal system, like, the Moon. This will certainly slow down the Moon's orbit around the Earth. Now, what will THAT change? First to my mind is: women's menstruation cycles. It will make it take longer between periods, which is a good thing for sure, but on the other hand, it may also lengthen how long she's experiencing it, which is really, really bad. Not sure whether this falls in the pro or con category.

      Other things: werewolves. Obviously, same deal as menstruation - less frequent, possibly for longer periods (so to speak). I'd invest in the silver industry, you could probably make a tidy profit on this! I won't make the joke about women being related to werewolves (cuz, you know, they get 'bitchy' at that time), because that would just be obvious and tacky, and this IS Slashdot.

      I'm pretty sure vampires are not effected by the Moon, so that's good, though this will not help prevent Dick Cheney attacks, so that's actually disappointing.

      As with other clean power production technologies, the animal rights activists will find a way to claim it hurts migratory birds, and I'm sure to some extent that will be true, though they'll likely be harmed a lot less by this than by the pollution produced by conventional power production.

      With fewer waves hitting the shoes, less sediment will be drawn into the ocean, so they'll be a bit more sparkly-clean looking, which is good, but there's probably some stuff in there that some ocean creature feeds on, so they'll starve, so that'll be bad.

      Most likely a net positive because of the reduced pollution thing, I'm guessing.

  5. Laws of Physics by charlievarrick · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When wave energy hits a breakwater the energy is dispersed and reflected back into the medium (the ocean). If it hits a a generator it is absorbed and converted into electrical energy. Something like this is taking energy out of a closed system which will have effects. How much? depends on how much energy you take out.

    1. Re:Laws of Physics by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're right about the energy being dispersed and reflected, but only a very small portion of wave energy goes back into the ocean. Most of it is absorbed by the beach. If this weren't the case the waves would be just as large going back out as they are coming in. Sure, sometimes the waves going back out are visible, but they are much smaller and it doesn't happen very often -- especially on shallow sandy beaches (think how much energy is lost in (very inelastic) collisions and sound (beaches are loud)).

    2. Re:Laws of Physics by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Couldn't the same be said about all the wind turbines we're setting up stopping/slowing the wind?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:Laws of Physics by charlievarrick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure. Covering a substantial quantity of the earth's surface with solar panels would probably have a substantial effect on surface tempurature/weather patterns. So would releasing all the stored carbon energy by lighting everthing on fire.

  6. Anticipated in 1932 SF novel! by StefanJ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Olaf Stapledon's "Last and First Men" is a mind-boggling future history. Very dated and politically/ideologically goofy in its early parts, then increasingly way-out as humanity nearly dies out, evolves, nearly dies out again, moves to a terraformed Venus . . . and so on, until the 17th and final human species dies out on Neptune 2 billions years from now.

    While racing through the history of the cat-like "Third Men," Stapledon notes that one civilization uses tidal power to such an extent that the orbit of the moon is slightly altered!

  7. Not this shiat again by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Funny

    Someone needs to create something along the lines of the spam solutions template, but for new technologies (like wave power or wind farms).

    I'll start:
    (things in bold can be easily replaced)

    Your solution advocates a

    (*) technical ( ) legislative (*) market-based ( ) vigilante

    approach to solving a looming energy problem. Your idea will not work. Here is why it won't work. (One or more of the following may apply to your particular idea, and it may have other flaws which used to vary from state to state or country to country before a bad federal or international law was passed.)

    (*) It will be fought by entrenched fishing interests
    (*) It will be fought by entrenched energy corporations
    (*) It will be fought by ______________
    (*) It will succumb to NIMBY Syndrome
    (*) Requires immediate total cooperation from everybody at once
    ( ) Technology doesn't work that way
    (*) NIMBY Syndrome will prevent mass deployment

    Specifically, your plan fails to account for:

    (*) Idiots with boats
    ( ) International reluctance to engage in sweeping change
    (*) Technically illiterate politicians
    (*) Extreme stupidity on the part of people who vote
    ( ) A lack of support from famous Musicians and Actors
    (*) Conflicting environmental interests

    and the following philosophical objections may also apply:

    ( ) The money could be better spent curing cancer
    ( ) Ideas similar to yours are easy to come up with, yet none have ever
    been shown practical
    (*) Feel-good measures do nothing to solve the problem
    (*) Your solution is expensive
    (*) Your solution may be politically infeasible
    ( ) The money could be better spent implementing [other] solution
    ( ) It makes life harder, not easier

    Furthermore, this is what I think about you:

    (*) Sorry dude, but I don't think it would work.
    ( ) This is a stupid idea, and you're a stupid person for suggesting it.
    ( ) Nice try, assh0le! I'm going to find out where you live and burn your house down!

    You get the idea. Please improve it.
    Not that I'm shitting on wave power, but NIMBY, questions about environmental impact and the fishing & energy industries could seriously crimp any offshore plans.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  8. New Wave Power? by dotancohen · · Score: 4, Funny

    New Wave Power is gonna fucking kick ass. Why hasn't anyone thought of this sooner?

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  9. Wave and Tidal... by PhotoGuy · · Score: 4, Informative

    It always surprised me that wave and tidal energy weren't harnessed more. Wave energy is really just wind energy thrown into a thick medium which should allow us to extract it in all its concentrated goodness. (And wind, in turn, is caused by solar heating.)

    But what always seemed more dramatic to me, however, are the tides. Especially living in an area with the highest tides in the world, seeing phenomenal amounts of water come in and out with a 6 foot difference, twice a day, always struck me as having a lot more potential (ha ha) than other sources of renewable energy. Effectively harnessing the gravitation pull of our moon through the tides, always seemed to me to be a solution that was too good to be true. There are days when the sea is calm and the wing generators are slower due to lack of wind; coal and oil prices vary wildly. But nothing stops the tides, day or night; the energy available and its cost is 100% predictable, which is a rarity among energy sources.

    In Nova Scotia, we have tidal power plant which generates power from the tides. However, it seems to be in a constant state of research, politics, grants, and such, and is fairly small. (Even twenty years ago, it was in this state; instead of referring to it by its name, the "Fundy Tidal Project," people used to refer to it as the "Tidy Fundal Project.") The amount of energy that could be captured from even a small part of the Bay of Fundy is staggering. Yes, it would be quite an engineering feat, but not really anything beyond other megaprojects. It's sad we haven't progressed further in harnessing this.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    1. Re:Wave and Tidal... by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well for tidal power there are a few problems.
      1. They Bay of Fundy is kind of unusual. There is a lack of sites that are really that good.
      2. Enviromental impact. Tidal areas tend to be very sensitive.
      3. Cost. Except at few places tidal energy isn't very dense. It would require constructing huge systems.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  10. Global calamity by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let me be the first to object to using tidal energy as a "renewable" resource. Don't people know that it will cause the moon to fly away from the Earth at ever increasing speeds? It's not like the energy is free, you know. Call me a lunatic if you'd like, but I refuse to destroy our moon just to let people run their massive new television sets.

  11. Re:Actually not. by jcr · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most of the wave energy is reflected back into the ocean

    Most?

    Not hardly. If that were the case, the ocean would be a lot rougher than it is. On a sandy or rocky shore, most of the wave's energy grinds the bits of the beach together, creating the sand, and slightly warming the water (which is offset by evaporation). The only places where you get most of the wave returned to the ocean is where it hits sheer, rocky cliffs.

    The ignorance and lack of common sense on Slashdot never ceases to fucking amaze.

    You amaze yourself?

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  12. Re:Environmentalists will shut this down by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Really I don't think the environmentalists (a) believe what they say, and (b) actually want to solve anything.

    There are environmentalists, and there are misanthropes who pretend to be environmentalists. The former are enthusiastic about alternative energy sources. The latter want us all to just freeze in the dark.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  13. works like a giant shake-up flashlight... by elyk · · Score: 3, Funny

    saves them work - those things tend to be waterproof already.

    --
    MS-DOS: Most Severe Denial of Service
    Free Online Backup