Slashdot Mirror


Spike VGAs Confuse, Gamecock Apologizes

Another year, another horrifying SpikeTV Video Game Awards show done and over with. BioShock grabbed the 'Game of the Year' nod, but both the title and designer Ken Levine were denied their moment in the sun. When the winner was announced some folks from Gamecock rushed the stage and basically said 'it sucks'. They're now apologizing: "Gamecock co-founder Mike Wilson apologized for the disruption on behalf of his team. 'I'd personally like to sincerely apologize to the BioShock team and Ken Levine in particular for GameCock infringing on their spotlight at this weekend's VGA Awards show ... The award acceptance they interrupted was the LAST one we would've wanted to interrupt , ('most addictive game fueled by mountain dew' would have been a wonderful choice) as we have the utmost respect and love for Bioshock.'"

5 of 105 comments (clear)

  1. What an informative summary and set of articles by Pluvius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What is Gamecock? What did they say? What sucked, the game or the award show? Who cares about anything that happens at the VGAs anyway?

    Rob

    1. Re:What an informative summary and set of articles by brkello · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have been a PC/console/handheld gamer and a long time reader of Slashdot and I have never heard either of those names until now. And if that is all they are, it is no wonder they are forgettable. I'd rather not know who they were.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
  2. Disingenuous apology by Scutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know, it sure sounds like they were thinking "It's better to beg forgiveness than to ask permission". I'm not impressed by their apology. It was a douchebag thing to do and a simple apology is insufficient.

    FTFA:

    it totally sucks that Ken Levine didn't get to speak after making such a fantastic game

    Yes. It does totally suck, so don't you think some act of contrition, other than empty words, would be appropriate?

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
  3. Re:OMG!!! by p0tat03 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Could it get any worst than is?

    Yes, in fact the rest of the VGAs show exactly how much worse it can get. Scrawling the names of winners on naked women in bodypaint? Sammy L. Jackson putting in a half-assed effort and cracking insulting, needlessly misogynistic jokes? I'm no feminist, and even I was offended.

    That awards show alone erased whatever sliver of mainstream respect good game developers have earned the industry over the years. Thanks a lot, Spike.

    For that piece of turd I'm now boycotting Spike as a channel indefinitely.

  4. Re:OMG!!! by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The women aren't naked. They are scantily clad. They have panties and pasties on, to be exact.

    That's not the point.

    I admit they are supposed to 'look' naked

    That is.

    Now don't get me wrong, I'm no prude and see nothing wrong with nudity in the right context (or pornography, for that matter), but this was not it. In fact, if you ask me it's just as demeaning to the males it was supposed to titillate as it is to the women; do they really think that we games-playing males are that juvenile? (Don't bother answering that, I play online games too...)