Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Comparing Browser JavaScript Performance

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the lining-'em-up dept.

Thwomp writes "Over at Coding Horror Jeff Atwood has an interesting writeup on JavaScript performance in the big four browsers. He used WebKit's newly announced SunSpider to produce the results. If a probable anomaly in the IE7 results is overlooked, Firefox 2 is the slowest of the bunch. Atwood has also benchmarked the latest Firefox Beta, and its performance seems to be improved significantly."

5 of 134 comments (clear)

  1. Hmmm by ubrgeek · · Score: 4, Funny

    > if a probable anomaly in the IE7 results is overlooked

    Like what? It didn't crash the system or it actually launched ;)

    --
    Bark less. Wag more.
  2. Ooh ooh let me guess by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 4, Funny

    With NoScript, Firefox's performance easily soars above the rest?

  3. Vista + ie7 took hours! by mseidl · · Score: 5, Funny

    <html>
    <body>
    <script type="text/javascript">
    var i=0
    for (i=0;i<=10;i++)
    {
    document.write.UAC("Cancel or Allow?");
    document.prompt("Yes, No, Maybe?);
    }
    </script>
    </table>
    </body>
    </html>
  4. Re:It's Flash by cheater512 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Seamonkey + Flash on my old P3 laptop is fine.

    If by fine you mean freaking bloody slow.
    Flash designers wouldnt know speed if it slapped them with a large trout.

    YouTube is good. It can handle a video pretty well (occasional frame dropping).
    Ads and many other things will reduce the computer to a crawl instantly.

  5. Re:Opera by ed.markovich · · Score: 3, Funny

    Looks like they are finally getting their javascript act together. After being a sore point for so many years, a working javascript in Opera will be welcome. I am just curious as to what you're talking about. I've been using Opera for a while now and have not noticed it having any JS issues.

    --
    http://ed.markovich.googlepages.com