Slashdot Mirror


NCAA Puts Severe Limits On Sport Event Blogging

An anonymous reader writes "You would think that the NCAA would be thrilled to have reporters live blogging events in order to generate more interest and keep passionate fans talking about NCAA sports. Not so. The governing body of the NCAA has released new rules for receiving press credentials and it includes severe limits on live blogging. If you're covering NCAA football, make sure you don't blog more than 3 times in a single quarter. If it's baseball, one post an inning is all you get. If you don't follow the rules expect to get ejected and have your press credentials pulled."

21 of 185 comments (clear)

  1. £5 says by Malevolent+Tester · · Score: 5, Funny

    The baseball bloggers start compiling meticulous statistics on ejection averages.

    --
    If you haven't made a developer cry, you've wasted a day.
    1. Re:£5 says by BZWingZero · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't you mean injection averages?

  2. Who needs press credentials? by Itchyeyes · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What exactly does the NCAA hope to accomplish by revoking press credentials when just about anyone can blog from anywhere with nothing more than a smart phone? Will the NCAA then start revoking peoples' cellphones at the gates? This move just reeks of idiocy.

  3. Re:How do they expect to detect this ? by pipatron · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They might take your equipment before you are allowed entrance to the event. Wouldn't be surprised if this happens.

    --
    c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
  4. Maybe it's time to start questioning... by drooling-dog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...why educational institutions ought to be in the business of quasi-professional sports in the first place. The tail has been wagging the dog for a long time now, and it's getting worse every year.

    1. Re:Maybe it's time to start questioning... by QuasiEvil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed - as someone who watched countless *academic* activities suffer every time the various sports programs needed money at my alma matter (despite the countless zillions their rights licensing brought in), I've always thought it was a complete travesty to everything higher education is about. Sports scholarships should be eliminated, and these jocks (at least the ones that are only there to play ball, and not really educate themselves) should go where they belong - minor league teams (which, I might add, the NFL could really use some sort of development league, much like minor league baseball and basketball teams produce players for MLB and the NBA).

      I'm probably the only person who actively cheers for whatever team is opposing my old university, just out of sheer hatred for the football program. Yeah, I've got anger issues.

  5. Re:How do they expect to detect this ? by bcattwoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And how are they going to take away your press credentials that you never had? This isn't for joe-everybody, it is for people with press credentials.

  6. Ask me if I give a shit about their rules by davmoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If its a private school, that's one thing. But if I'm at a game involving my local public university, which is supported by my tax dollars, I'm not going to bother getting press credentials, and I'll blog about any damned thing I want during their game. And I'll do it as often as I want. Fuck the NCAA. If they want to restrict my commenting on their sports, then their team's schools do not need my supporting tax dollars. My tax dollars, then its my property too. Period. No exceptions.

    (And yes, I feel the same way about a university's research. If that research was paid for by a company, they can control it how ever they like. But if that research was paid for by my tax dollars, then they can take their patent application and shove it up their collective ass.)

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    1. Re:Ask me if I give a shit about their rules by stewbacca · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not going to bother getting press credentials, and I'll blog about any damned thing I want during their game. And I'll do it as often as I want. Fuck the NCAA.
      Maybe I misread the article, but you are free to do exactly what you describe, since you don't have press credentials. No fucking of the NCAA is required. If it were the other way around there'd be a problem (i.e., prohibiting non-credentialed people from phoning/blogging in scores).
    2. Re:Ask me if I give a shit about their rules by rhizome · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If it were the other way around there'd be a problem (i.e., prohibiting non-credentialed people from phoning/blogging in scores).

      Do you really think they're unprepared for this? Once the press figures out that you don't need credentials to sit in your seat and tap out blog entries from your phone they're going to start ejecting people for that, too. It'll be the fan-attacking RIAA mess all over again.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
  7. Re:Bullshit by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe they should adopt an even more restrictive information model to drum up more live interest, like the model of Brockian Ultra-Cricket where not only is there no reporting on the game, you can't even see the game when you attend it!

    Take it to the next level: completely seal up the arena so no one can observe the game other than the players and you'll have the Wide World of Schrödinger Sports!

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  8. Re:How do they expect to detect this ? by hal2814 · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Less even detect at which seating I am ?"

    I think you miss the point. The only seating they are concerned with here is the press box (and anywhere else press credentials will get you like the sidelines in some cases). If you're going to blog from the stands, then no they can't stop you but if you're going to use your blog to become a card-carrying member of the press and get into the event on their dime, then you're going to play by their rules. Generally speaking they will be keeping an eye on you in that case. They're kind of stupid rules but at least bloggers can get press credentials for NCAA events.

  9. Re:How do they expect to detect this ? by spiritraveller · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's targeted at people with press credentials. If you have press credentials, you probably aren't sitting in the stands. You are probably in the press area. And since you have applied for and received these credentials, they know who you are.

    How would they detect it? By checking your blog probably.

    Can they stop Joe Everybody from doing it? As a practical matter, probably not. And they probably aren't too worried about Joe Everybody (at least not yet). As for the legal issues, I don't see a problem with it. It's their game, and they set the rules. If you break the rules, they kick you out.

  10. Not surprising by ubrgeek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When I was at jacksonville.com (the Florida Times-Union Website) the Jaguars had just come into being. Obviously the local paper was going to cover them. Two issues came up: As part of our server farm, we named our servers, "entertainment.jacksonville.com," "lifestyle.jacksonville.com," "business.jacksonville.com," etc. Because we knew the Jags site would be so popular, we didn't put it on sports.jacksonville.com. Instead it went on jaguars.jacksonville.com. The Jags and the NFL threw a fit, claiming that we were doing it in an effort to capitalize on the names (nevermind that we had server logs from more than a year prior showing our naming convention.) For the outcome, go to http://jaguars.jacksonville.com/ ... It's still being used 10 years later.

    The second was they were having a fit because we were shooting pictures of the game and posting them to the site. Not in real-time. After the game. As part of our coverage. Our publisher agreed to stop doing so ... in exchange, the paper wouldn't write any articles about the team.

    So there we were, two days later, posting pictures to the site ... ;)

    --
    Bark less. Wag more.
  11. Re:Bullshit by iamdrscience · · Score: 4, Funny

    Also, NCAA, shoot yourself in the foot much?
    They can't help it, they're the NCAA and as we all know on Slashdot, all organizations ending in "AA" are prone to shooting themselves in the foot by creating new rules/laws.
  12. Re:Bullshit by sm62704 · · Score: 4, Funny

    NCAA, shoot yourself in the foot much?

    The NCAA deals more with balls than feet, making the shot far more painful.

    -mcgrew

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  13. Other NCAA Forbidden Items by deweycheetham · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Welcome to the world of the Fighting Illini at the University of Illinois.

    The NCAA has outlawed any pictures or representations of our Mascot. Take a look and you can see why (if you can't, your in sensitive clod).

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/e6/Illinilogo.png

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/a2/2006-11-11_-_Chief_Illiniwek.jpg/200px-2006-11-11_-_Chief_Illiniwek.jpg

  14. Pro or amateur sports? by fermion · · Score: 4, Insightful
    One issue that has come up is the issue of whether the kids playing should have the protection we usually give kids, or if they should be treated like the pro players, or somewhere in between. On thing that is clear is that many NCAA players do receive some kind of compensation in excess of room, board, and classes normally awarded the top scholar, though likely not near the compensation of a pro player. Rules such as these also makes it clear that the NCAA itself behaves more like a pro sports organization than an amateur venue. On cannot, for instance, imagine an amateur musician, actor, athlete, or other entertainer limiting the press coverage of their act. The only people who wish to limit such coverage are those pro organization who need to monetize every score, stat, call, play, and image to generate the profits needed to support a pro organization.

    This is why I think the distinction is important. If the NCAA is an amateur organization, then we can forgive the situation when some of the member athletes do something stupid, like hire a stripper and serve beer to underage players, then do not have the maturity to excise themselves in a graceful way. But if they are not amateurs, of if NCAA wants to have the privileges affords pro sports, then they must also take on some of the responsibilities. Which means no one can call fowl when the players, even though they are kids, and have their names plastered across all the papers everytime they do something stupid. One cool thing about college is that one can get away with stuff one could never get away with on the outside. The side thing is that kids are accepting these high levels of responsibility without even thinking of the freedoms they are giving up.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  15. Blogging Gerund Fun by Adambomb · · Score: 3, Funny

    Calvin certainly said it best.

    Verbing weirds language.

    --
    Ice Cream has no bones.
  16. Re:How do they expect to detect this ? by Doctor-Optimal · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have a ton laying around my house in little round circles. Thank you for clarifying that those circles were, in fact, round.
    --
    New punctuation update "~" (no quotes) at the end of a line to indicate sarcasm. ~
  17. Re:How do they expect to detect this ? by NNKK · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=operations_2&id=cellular

    "The operation of transmitters designed to jam or block wireless communications is a violation of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"). See 47 U.S.C. Sections 301, 302a, 333. The Act prohibits any person from willfully or maliciously interfering with the radio communications of any station licensed or authorized under the Act or operated by the U.S. government. 47 U.S.C. Section 333. The manufacture, importation, sale or offer for sale, including advertising, of devices designed to block or jam wireless transmissions is prohibited. 47 U.S.C. Section 302a(b). Parties in violation of these provisions may be subject to the penalties set out in 47 U.S.C. Sections 501-510. Fines for a first offense can range as high as $11,000 for each violation or imprisonment for up to one year, and the device used may also be seized and forfeited to the U.S. government."

    This applies even on private property, because of the largely uncontrollable nature of signal propagation. For this same reason, it is effectively impossible for any person, entity, or government short of the federal government in the US to make any sort of rules relating to radio transmission, no matter where they try to enforce such rules.