Slashdot Mirror


Email In the 18th Century

morphovar forwards a writeup in Low-tech Magazine recounting an almost-forgotten predecessor to email and packet-switched messaging: the optical telegraph. The article maps out some of the European networks but provides no details of those built in North America in the early 1800s. Man-in-the-middle attacks were dead easy. "More than 200 years ago it was already possible to send messages throughout Europe and America at the speed of an airplane — wireless and without need for electricity. The optical telegraph network consisted of a chain of towers ... placed 5 to 20 kilometers apart from each other. Every tower had a telegrapher, looking through a telescope at the previous tower in the chain. If the semaphore on that tower was put into a certain position, the telegrapher copied that symbol on his own tower. A message could be transmitted from Amsterdam to Venice in one hour's time. A few years before, a messenger on a horse would have needed at least a month's time to do the same."

23 of 279 comments (clear)

  1. Spam? by AlphaDrake · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did spam make it across these networks as well?

    "Having trouble with the smell of thine donkey? Only have the one mistress? Try friar pete's ol' fashioned elixer de skunke, it's new lead based formula works wonders like that Jesus guy over there"

    1. Re:Spam? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Funny

      Indeed. A guy named Isaac Bayes would stand between two of the towers and every time he spotted a reference to making your penis larger, he would create a lot of thick black smoke so as to block the transmission between two towers.

      And to this day, most spam filters are still called 'Bayesian filters.'

    2. Re:Spam? by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Note: A wanker is the term for a person who masterbates. "A wanker wanks".

      So my dick-tionary is wrong?

    3. Re:Spam? by ArAgost · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, I can assume that once you reach a certain proficiency, you can be called a MASTERbator.

    4. Re:Spam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It couldn't be. SPAM wasn't invented until 1937. Back then, annoying messages were called "salted beef." This was the actual origin of "where is the beef?" expression.

    5. Re:Spam? by zhirole+nift · · Score: 2, Funny

      everybody masturbates. those who claim otherwise are 'wankers'.

  2. Light the Fires by coaxial · · Score: 5, Funny

    Gondor needs help.

    1. Re:Light the Fires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It was your classic hobbit in the middle attack.

  3. but by Sobieski · · Score: 5, Funny

    If it was "wireless and without need for electricity", then it was not electronic mail

    --
    Particles, stuff that matters.
    1. Re:but by fbjon · · Score: 3, Funny

      This was enterprise mail, hence not available to the plebes.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  4. Re:omfg by mdenham · · Score: 2, Funny

    Talk about a shit job. How many of them jumped out of the towers to their own death out of sheer boredom? Not nearly as many as probably made amusing edits to messages on occasion.

    "S... E... N... D... send, F... A... R... C... E... S... farces?!"

  5. patent trolls by yabba-dabba-do · · Score: 3, Funny

    In other news, NTP is now looking for someone to sue over this infringing technology.

  6. i have a great comment by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Funny

    please watch this space for 3 hours in order to view it

    my comment is currently being transmitted from schenectady to poughkeepsie and the bad weather is interfereing with the candles staying lit

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  7. So... by Rip+Dick · · Score: 5, Funny

    Was the Optical Telegraph networked described by the clueless politicians of the time as a "series of flags"?

  8. Re:Ah, Clacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    No worries. Antibiotics will clear that right up.

  9. Wow! by sunspot42 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Looks like the Victorians could copy and transmit data faster than Windows Vista!

  10. Semaphores weren't the first by Jesus_666 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, the semaphore-based network wasn't the first on in Europe. Before it, there was a simpler network based around mutexes, but it wasn't very popular because it got quite bothersome once you had more than two people communicating. Still it was a major step forward from the previous concurrent networks where the non-locked shared message space meant that if two people broadcasted at the same time they'd overwrite each other's messages.

    Much later, North America would see an experimental monitor-based optical messaging network, but the cost of keeping hundreds of big CRTs powered on all the time quickly put an end to it.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    1. Re:Semaphores weren't the first by Watson+Ladd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Later Reppy implemented a rendezvous based messaging system, but only the French really understood it.

      --
      Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Frontinus, 1st cent. AD
  11. Re:taggers are fucking illiterate by halcyon1234 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mmmm, bacons of Gondor. Sizzling fatty meats of Frodo!

  12. "Virus" by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    network consisted of a chain of towers... placed 5 to 20 kilometers apart from each other. Every tower had a telegrapher [worker], looking through a telescope at the previous tower in the chain...

    Back then when a "node was infected with a virus", it was literal.

  13. My semaphore tower sucks by Jesus_666 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't want to start a holy war here, but what is the deal with you semaphore fanatics? I've been sitting here at my freelance gig in front of a semaphore tower (a 1860/300 w/64 flags) for about 20 weeks now while it attempts to copy a 17 Meg file from one city on the east coast to another city. 20 weeks. At home, on my dovecote running Columba livia domestica, which by all standards should be a lot slower than this semaphore tower, the same operation would take about 2 weeks. If that.

    In addition, during this file transfer, the newspaper will not work. And everything else has ground to a halt. Even my inkwell is straining to keep up as I type this.

    I won't bore you with the laundry list of other problems that I've encountered while working on various semaphore towers, but suffice it to say there have been many, not the least of which is I've never seen a semaphore tower that has run faster than its dove counterpart, despite the semaphore towers' faster signalling architecture. My pigeonry with 8 Columba palumbus' runs faster than this 300 flag-position machine at times. From a productivity standpoint, I don't get how people can claim that the semaphore tower is a superior machine.

    Semaphore addicts, flame me if you'd like, but I'd rather hear some intelligent reasons why anyone would choose to use a semaphore tower over other faster, cheaper, more stable systems.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  14. Only on slashdot by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Funny

    The irony of having to define the word "Wanker" to a bunch of mostly American nerds.

    --
    Deleted
  15. Re:Chappe's telegraph and buiding of a fortune by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought the Rothchilds use carrier pigeons, a competing form of packet based communication.
    Yes, but their packets were more susceptible to malware, especially of the Hawk variety. A Beowulf cluster of Hawks was the ultimate in DOS attacks.